Stormy Daniels, Gennifer Flowers, Chris Rose, Liz Reyes--what can you say?
The makings of a great and certain to be sold-out Politics With Punch.
Daniels, the “adult film star” who might be a candidate for US Senate against David Vitter, will be a panelist on the always-funny and provocative Politics With A Punch, next Wednesday, July 1 at the Cricket Club in New Orleans, 2040 Saint Charles Ave.
Joining her on the panel will be Gennifer Flowers and Liz Reyes, anchor woman of WGNO, ABC 26. Now, add it Chris Rose, famed columnist of the Times Picayune and even more.
Here is the full cast:
· Stormy Daniels, Adult Film Star and Potential Senate Candidate
· Ken Ferguson, Impersonator, Comedian and Actor
· Gennifer Flowers, Singer and Entertainer
· Liz Reyes, News Anchor, WGNO-TV ABC-26
· Chad Rogers, Publisher, TheDeadPelican.com
· Chris Rose, Times Picayune Columnist
· Mike Strecker, Superstar Comedian
Doors open at 6 and the show begins at 8 pm.
The balance of the panel will be announced shortly.
Stormy Daniels announced that she is being drafted to run for US Senate against David Vitter, however, she has not yet made up her mind whether she will run.Still, she has been making appearances on various national news programs such as FoxNews and CNN.
Politics With A Punch was founded by Bayoubuzz Publisher and attorney, Stephen Sabludowsky and is emceed by radio talk show host, TV political analyst and columnist, Jeff Crouere.
“Punch” carries the slogan as “Funnier Than Laughing Gas” for its irreverent, hilarious but timely discussions.Over the years, its panelists have ranged from Governor-candidate Bobby Jindal to major news makers to the tops in the local media to well-known national figures.
This event is absolutely expected to be sold out and reservations should be made in advance.Contact Stephen Sabludowsky at steve@bayoubuzz.com or 504-339-3254 or Jeff Crouere at jeff@ringsidepolitics.com or 504-669-6076 to order your tickets. Sabludowsky and Crouere expect an audience to come in like a “storm”.
Bugs: "General Lee!?...... Why, the war between the States ended almost ninety years ago!" - - - Confederate (Yoesemite) Sam: "I'm no clockwatcher! And until I hears' from General Lee official, I'ma blastin' any Yankee that sets foot on Souther soil, so scram Yankee!" Bugs: "I wonder why they put the South so far....South."
Written by
on 6/26/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
Posted by: Nate Berg - - - - 23 June 2009 - 9:00am - - - - The city of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, will soon be one of the most watched cities in the world, with plans for 165 closed circuit cameras monitoring public spaces. - - - The plan has some in the city concerned about privacy, but for the most part, little outcry has been heard. - - - "Some 165 closed-circuit TV cameras soon will provide live, round-the-clock scrutiny of nearly every street, park and other public space used by the 55,000 residents and the town's many tourists. That's more outdoor cameras than are used by many major cities, including San Francisco and Boston. - - - - Unlike anywhere else, cash-strapped Lancaster outsourced its surveillance to a private nonprofit group that hires civilians to tilt, pan and zoom the cameras -- and to call police if they spot suspicious activity. No government agency is directly involved." - - - - - - Planetizen dot com
Written by
on 6/26/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
Unconventional Thinking - - - Why cities shouldn’t buy into the convention center economy - - - - By: Josh Stephens - - - Two generations ago, city economies relied on money from the products they manufactured. Faraway customers purchased Fords, Zeniths, Maytags and Levi’s, and their cash made its way to the factory foreman and his workers, who would then spread the wealth to the local butcher and baker. In the postindustrial visitor economy, however, the city itself becomes the product, and cities must contrive reasons for people to visit. Enter the convention center.......... At any given moment, the average American convention center is buzzing with accountants, motivational speakers, comic book collectors and other hordes of professionals and enthusiasts — adding up to 12,000 events a year. As the demand for spaces in which to buy, sell, make deals and exchange information has boomed, formerly modest meeting halls have ballooned into spaces that could swallow a typical Wal-Mart whole. Since 1993 American cities have invested more than $23 billion in ever-larger boxes that now number more than 320, and since 2000 the country’s total convention space increased by 25 percent to nearly 90 million square feet, which collectively eclipses the commercial space in all but two of America’s largest central business districts. Chicago’s McCormick Place alone spans 2.6 million square feet, with contiguous spaces that could hold about as many superlatives as you care to fit. The story of a single convention center would be an unremarkable tale. There is no Guggenheim Bilbao, but no Pruitt-Igoe either............. The story of convention centers is that, for all cities do to distinguish themselves, the convention industry treats cities not as places but rather as spaces — fungible, interchangeable and characterless. Even though convention centers are marketed with Platonic conceptions of cities (palm trees, skyscrapers, longhorns, slot machines), the convention economy is one of placelessness. “Most of them have removed themselves from the community they’re in by virtue of becoming developments that are about drawing people into the city, not about being integrated in the city culture and fabric,” says Fred Kent, president of the Project for Public Spaces, which advocates for attractive, energized public spaces.............. Even so, convention centers might seem tolerably innocuous — they don’t pollute (directly), they don’t bulldoze historic neighborhoods (usually), and they pay for themselves — except when they don’t....... Registration Fees....... While the convention industry has forged ahead, Heywood Sanders, professor of political science at the University of Texas-San Antonio, has positioned himself as its leading opponent — making him more or less a convention of one. In his 2005 Brookings Institution paper “Space Available: The Realities of Convention Centers as Economic Development Strategy,” Sanders, who has testified before Congress and often giggles when he discusses the industry’s absurdities, described the breathtaking pace at which convention-center supply was outstripping demand............ Despite the steady increase in nationwide square footage, Sanders presents data indicating that attendance at many convention centers, including the mighty McCormick Place and New York’s Javits Center, declined markedly from 1996 to 2003. When demand declines in a typical capitalist system, weak companies go out of business and successful ones get leaner. Convention centers do not respond to market signals quite so rationally. With fixed footprints, they generally cannot downsize, and as wholly owned subsidiaries of urban America, they cannot outsource. Their chief solution, then, is to expand. A 420,000-square-foot expansion of Houston’s George R. Brown Center was projected to yield nearly 600,000 room-nights in 2005, but a 2006 audit found that it was generating roughly 220,000 annual room-nights. In 2003 Washington, D.C., completed an $850 million expansion; as of 2007 annual convention-related hotel bookings were roughly 25 percent below projections, and the convention center’s 2007 operating loss was estimated at $22 million. In cities from Los Angeles to Boston to Baltimore, the story is much the same. The current economic crisis is, of course, bound to make matters worse.......... Many convention centers, it turns out, limp along in a spectral guise of success: plenty of them do robust business, but almost none generates the revenues that they promise.”......... Nonetheless, according to industry publication Trade Show Week, 71 expansions or new projects, 81 percent of which involve public funding, were underway as of September 2008, in keeping with the 10-year average of 74 projects underway at any given moment. In his analysis of these figures, Trade Show Week’s Michael Hughes writes, “It is still a buyer’s market for convention center space, and the extra space under development will exacerbate this.” In other words, convention centers are offering lower rents and sweetheart deals in order to attract fewer tenants who rent less space.......... This remarkable escalation in the number and size of facilities stems from genuine civic enthusiasm, opportunism and cities’ belief in their own exceptionalism. According to Sanders, officials hold fast to dreams of what a new building or exhibit hall can do without acknowledging that the very same ideas are brewing in the minds of civic boosters elsewhere. Those boosters almost invariably rely on the recommendations of consultants, upon whom Sanders levels much of the blame for the national oversupply. “You have a great many people with very particular interests in making these things happen: consultants, unions, developers,” says Sanders. “All of that suggests that what’s going on in the larger market doesn’t matter, because fundamentally there’s no one who will pay the price for a center not delivering what it’s supposed to.”........... These consultants usually work for quasi-public convention and visitors bureaus. Part bureaucracy, part marketing firm and part real estate developer, these agencies operate with single-minded attitudes toward increasing attendance and, at regular intervals, commandeering public funds to expand and upgrade their spaces to attract major events and out-of-town visitors. Consultants often offer optimistic projections of attendance, accompanied by optimistic projections of spinoff expenditures, by way of hotel nights and meals consumed. And cities buy into it: “We are very familiar with the benefits of the industry, and we understand the rollover effect of meetings and conventions,” says Mike Carrier, president of the Oklahoma City Convention and Visitors Bureau, which is studying an expansion of its facility. “These don’t necessarily pay directly for the facilities, but the indirect benefits through increased sales taxes, the spending in local hotels, restaurants, entertainment, are very beneficial for the city.”............. Ironically, though, the events that demand the most space and the highest rent — great exhibits such as boat and car shows — tend to attract locals with no need for hotels. Meanwhile, the cosmographers who attend a Galactic Center Workshop might stay the week at top dollar, but there are only 100 of them. In the world. And while more square footage allows convention centers to accommodate bigger events, there is no guarantee that they won’t sit idle for long stretches. Sanders notes that business is not growing among the country’s 200 largest events, and that expansion makes little sense in a market where the vast majority of events do not need hundreds of thousands of square feet. “There is very clear evidence of ongoing growth on the supply side,” says Sanders. “There is every indication even from folks within the industry that the market is seriously overbuilt. There are a lot more convention centers chasing a relatively fixed volume of events.”.......... Boosters, of course, are quick to point out that they rarely, if ever, expect rents to cover capital costs (or even operating costs), thereby undercutting Sanders’ fiscally conservative line of criticism. “They’ve never been intended to be profitable,” says Steven Hacker, president of the International Association of Exhibitions and Events. “They’ve been intended to attract audience and the audience has the economic clout, the impact to the local community by way of hotel rooms, restaurant meals, entertainment, expenses to support the business activity on the show floor, etc. The buildings are nothing more than a convenient stage upon which to build that economic model.”.............. Look Who’s Paying.......... Sanders has acquired such nicknames as “Dr. No” from industry advocates, who maintain that the building boom, along with its billions of dollars in public expenditures, is a sign of healthy competition. “There are times when we think that competition among cities is actually healthy,” says Edward Glaeser, professor of urban economics at Harvard University. “It’s a good thing when cities compete by having better schools and safer streets and even by reducing taxes. The question is whether they’re competing in a way that actually delivers value.”............. But by the time convention centers can answer the “value” question, it’s often too late to change course — and it’s likely no one bothered to make the calculations. In the pantheon of public works and the litany of angry responses generated by NIMBYs, convention centers have hit on a formula that has allowed them to proliferate and expand almost without anyone noticing. Their downtown-edge locations and low profiles help them avoid the ire of neighbors, and their funding mechanisms — bonds or, more likely, hotel taxes — mean that local taxpayers do not directly bear capital costs. “Convention centers are not sexy. They’re below the radar,” says Dennis Judd, professor of political science at the University of Illinois at Chicago. “They have very well-organized interests working on their behalf, and then you have an unorganized, inchoate public who may knit their brows. That’s an unequal contest.”........... Because they play nearly no role in a city’s indigenous culture, convention centers are ignored by would-be activists and watchdogs who might speak up if it were clear that funds that could have gone to, say, schools were going to a convention center instead. “Since nobody’s ox is being directly gored, it isn’t as if you feel your kids’ kindergarten class is going to have five more students in it because they’re building this convention center — even though it might,” says Susan Fainstein, professor of planning at Harvard and editor of Tourist City........... To repay the public largesse, convention centers almost always promise positive externalities and multipliers that could, in a fanciful world, justify hundreds of millions in public subsidies. But those externalities are vague, opaque and almost impossible to measure, especially ex ante. They are, therefore, almost impossible to oppose. Meanwhile, the hotels, real estate interests, downtown business groups and public officials who gain directly from convention business portray them as painless investments. “There’s a limited range of things that cities can do and a limited range of things that mayors can say, ‘Look what I did for the city,’” says Fainstein. “They like things that are visible … but I don’t think that any rational benefit-cost analysis can justify it in most places.”........... Lack In The Box......... While fiscal conservatives such as Sanders might legitimately debate, or disregard, the economic benefits of convention centers, their aesthetic offenses are, with scant exception, undeniable. Convention centers — which differ from warehouses only in their cloyingly futuristic entryways and clever skins to disguise the enormous sheds therein — sit most comfortably on large forlorn parcels, often surrounded by other large, forlorn parcels. Though sightseers may wing off in search of cobblestone streets or natural grandeur, the typical convention-goer arrives with modest needs and no expectations, which are likely to be met. Cities become mere destinations — a bland chain stretching from Jetway to hotel lobby to meeting hall to Chili’s — rather than genuine places. “If you sign up for a convention center and your company sends you there, that’s where you wind up,” says Los Angeles Times architecture critic Christopher Hawthorne. “You’re not making a decision to see a particular convention center.”........... Only recently have a handful of convention centers gestured toward high design. Renowned architect Rafael Viñoly has singlehandedly cornered the market on highbrow convention centers with his 1.5 million-square-foot, waterfront David L. Lawrence Convention Center in Pittsburgh and 660,000-square-foot Boston Convention and Events Center, the latter of which looks impressively like the starship Enterprise in drydock, with a titanium prow stretching toward the harbor. Otherwise, starchitects have tended to bestow their gifts elsewhere. “It’s difficult to find an architect who is self-effacing enough to [design a convention center],” says the Congress for the New Urbanism co-founder Andres Duany, whose prescriptions for urban America typically do not come in million-square-foot doses. “For most architects, a building of that size is their bid for immortality. So they want to be as different and unique as possible, and it’s very difficult with an elephantine building to do that.”.......... Populous (formerly HOK Sport Venue Event), the firm famous for designing neo-traditional ballparks and arenas, has positioned itself to bring innovation and higher-minded design to the next generation of convention centers. “A lot of cities … just want something incrementally better than their next competitor,” says Populous senior principal Todd Voth........... “I think there’s an opportunity to redefine the whole convention center building per se, and people were just willing to take a little bit more risk.” Voth says that his group tries to embody core principles that include aesthetics, sustainability and connection to the urban fabric. The group’s flagship design opened recently in Phoenix, where an additional 870,000 square feet has tripled the facility’s size............. Then again, whatever sculptural elements or detailing an architect can bring, the greatest challenge facing convention centers is that, for the most part, they fail to relate to the urban fabric that surrounds them. Viñoly’s BCEC, for example, occupies a wide berth in a formerly industrial section of Boston. Utterly devoid of history or urban intrigue, it sits across a highway and a channel from quaint downtown streets where the shots of the Revolution once echoed. At their worst, convention centers equate to taxation without representation, because city residents are sacrificing funds that in some cases could be spent on other redevelopment strategies that enhance their street life. ” It would be surrounded by urban fabric, seamlessly,” says Duany. “It would not have blank walls. There would probably be shops. There would be liner buildings. As a convention center, it probably would not be particularly expressive.” .......... “Big-scale government programs for stadiums and convention centers don’t work,” says Richard Florida, author and proponent of the theory that cities gain vibrancy from the “creative class.” “Small investment into the arts provides public leaders with a viable alternative to the large capital investments and helps to foster the organic development of a creative scene that is unique to their community.” ....... Ultimately, convention centers are an example of the tail wagging the dog: If cities had pleasant, vibrant, appealing neighborhoods — of the sort that create their own economies and draw visitors — they wouldn’t need contrived assembly spaces in the first place. Most convention centers are removed from their communities by virtue of becoming developments that are about drawing people into the city, not about being integrated in the city culture and fabric. “In the end,” says Sanders, “what you’re getting is a box, however nicely done, that is competing in a marketplace crowded with other boxes.”...........
Written by
on 6/26/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
Chris Rose alone is worth the price of admission. Written by dat's what i say HONKEY (honky?)
on 6/25/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
Oh well, never fear, - - - Real Estate - - - Best And Worst Bang For The Buck Cities - - - By; Abha Bhattarai, 10.10.08, 02:30 PM EDT - - - The economic storm sweeping the country has left Americans with few places to hide........... But those looking to hunker down might want to head to Texas, where they can get the best value for their dollar. - - - - Three Midwestern cities round out the top 10: Indianapolis; Columbus, Ohio; and Minneapolis. - - - - - The worst-ranked cities, after Los Angeles, were Providence, R.I.; NEW ORLEANS; Philadelphia; and Cleveland............. Now that was the story, what is today's scoop 9 months later??? We see that New Orleans skated under the wire for 'bad' neighborhoods (one would want to question why) Written by
on 6/25/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
But for investment tips, Raising Cane's chicken may be a very good investment move, it is listed amongst franchises that may become the next 'McDonald's'.... Written by
on 6/25/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
Well folks, you can put down the rah-rah-rah-siskoomba for awhile, I know New Orleans is desperately looking for the sympathy (sort of like sitting around a freeway off ramp with a sign that says: “Will work for food” slung around its neck) / notoriety (We is gansta’s an’ we goona make yer vakashun misribles) equation to boost dollars one way or another but the fact is New Orleans didn’t even make it on the current 25 Most Dangerous Neighborhoods in the United States list which is as follows; (1) Cincinnati, Ohio (Central Pky./Liberty St.) - (2) Chicago, Ill. (State St./Garfield Blvd.) - (3) Miami, Fla. (7th Ave./North River Dr.) - (4) Jacksonville, Fla. (Beaver St./Broad St.) - (5) Baltimore, Md.(North Ave./Belair Rd.) - (6) Kansas City, Mo. (Bales Ave./30th St.) - (7) Memphis, Tenn. (Warford St./Mount Olive Rd.) - (8) Kansas City, Mo. (Forest Ave./41st St.) - (9) Dallas, Texas (Route 352/Scyene Rd.) - (10) Richmond, Va. (Church Hill) - (11) Memphis, Tenn. (Bellevue Blvd./Lamar Ave.) - (12) Dallas, Texas (2nd Ave./Hatcher St.) - (13) Springfield, Ill. (Cook St./11th St.) - (14) St. Louis, Mo. (14th St./Dr. Martin Luther King Dr.) - (15) Little Rock, Ark. (Roosevelt Rd./Bond St.) - (16) Philadelphia, Pa. (Broad St./Dauphin St.) - (17) Tampa, Fla. (Amelia Ave./Tampa St.) - (18) New York, N.Y. (St. Nicholas Ave./125th St.) - (19) Chicago, Ill. (66th St./Yale Ave.) - (20) Baltimore, Md. (Orleans St./Front St.) - (21) Cleveland, Ohio (Cedar Ave./55th St.) - (22) Orlando, Fla. (East-West Expy/Orange Blossom Trl.) - (23) Detroit, Mich. (Mount Elliott St./Palmer Ave.) - (24) Chicago, Ill. (Wallace St./58th St.) - (25) Chicago, Ill. (Winchester, Ave./60th St.) - - - - You need to tell those kandi arse tough boy thug life punks you have cluttering up the streets there to either tighten up or move where they can get some real notoriety... Getting sort of tired of the New Orleans "punk-fest"....... Written by
on 6/25/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
"Hewwo, Woscoe. Can you come over? We're unexpectedwy having a chicken dinner."
Written by
on 6/25/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
On this day in 1835, the 1st building was constructed at Yerba Buena (now SF)……… Less than 100 years later the 1906 earthquake hit San Francisco….. That particular earthquake and resulting fire is remembered as one of the worst natural disasters in the history of the United States. The death toll from the earthquake and resulting fire, estimated to be above 3,000, is the greatest loss of life from a single natural disaster in California's history. The economic impact has been compared with the more recent Hurricane Katrina, however the death count far exceeded that and is being considered to have surpassed perhaps the 5,000 mark by some historians….. The rush to rebuild was the desire to be ready for the Panama-Pacific International Exposition set to be hosted in 1915, and indeed by that year (9 years later) there was almost no visible damage to be seen in the city. 9 years later, a city almost entirely razed to the ground leaving only ashes and rubble reappeared…… Written by
on 6/25/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE
