Today, Governor Bobby Jindal vetoed legislation which he said expanded gambling and the state construction and renovations of schools.Here are his veto letters:
Today, Governor Bobby Jindal vetoed HB 937, SB 398, and SB 386 and issued the following veto letters:
The Honorable Alfred W. Speer
Clerk of the House of Representatives
State Capitol
Baton Rouge, LA70802
Re:House Bill No. 937 by Representative St. Germain
Veto Message
Dear Mr. Speer:
House Bill 937 would require a referendum election to permit a live horse racing facility and slotmachine gaming at a facility in Iberville Parish. I am opposed to this legislation because itcontemplates the expansion of gaming.
For this reason, I have vetoed House Bill No. 937 and hereby return it to the House of
Representatives.
Very truly yours,
Bobby Jindal
Governor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
The Honorable Glenn Koepp
Secretary of the Senate
State Capitol
Baton Rouge, LA70802
Re:Senate Bill No. 398 by Senator Marionneaux
Veto Message
Dear Mr. Koepp:
Senate Bill No. 398 is contingent upon the passage of House Bill 937, which I have vetoed becauseit contemplates the expansion of gaming. For this reason, I have vetoed SB 398, and hereby returnit to the Senate.
Very truly yours,
Bobby Jindal
Governor
= = = = = = = = = = =
The Honorable Glenn Koepp
Secretary of the Senate
State Capitol
Baton Rouge, LA70802
Re:Senate Bill No. 386 by Senator Hebert
Dear Mr. Koepp:
Senate Bill 386 lowers the legal age for gaming from twenty-one to eighteen for active andhonorably discharged members of the military and National Guard. I am opposed to this legislationbecause it expands gaming. For this reason, I have vetoed SB 386 and hereby return it to the Senate.
Very truly yours,
Bobby Jindal
Governor
Also, today, Governor Bobby Jindal vetoed SB 632 and HB 962 and issued the following veto letters:
Senate Bill No. 632, along with companion House Bill No. 962 by Representative Peterson, opensthe door to future state funding of construction and renovation of local public school facilities.
While this appears to be a worthwhile goal, it represents a fundamental shift in the planning andfinancing of school facilities and would open the door to a very costly state-funded school facilitiesprogram. This has traditionally been a local responsibility driven by the needs and wishes of citizensin each school district. Funding is provided through the approval of local efforts and limiteddiscretionary monies received by the school systems from the state’s Minimum Foundation Program(MFP). In addition to funding from the enrollment-based MFP formula, increased revenues raisedthrough local efforts are eligible for reward funding in which the state contributes a match, therebyproviding school systems with even more discretionary money.
The state currently has unmet obligations such as the unfunded accrued liability of the statewideretirement systems, the backlog of deferred maintenance on roads, and an estimated $2 billion indeferred maintenance on state buildings. Senate Bill No. 632 establishes the Louisiana StatewideEducation Facilities Authority and grants this body with the authority to sell bonds backed by thefull faith and credit of the state. If the Authority were to sell bonds, this could have a negativeimpact on the 6% constitutional net state supported debt limit and hamper the state’s ability to fundnormal capital outlay.
For these reasons, I have vetoed Senate Bill No. 632 and hereby return it to the Senate.
Very truly yours,
Bobby Jindal
Governor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
The Honorable Alfred W. Speer
Clerk of the House of Representatives
State Capitol
Baton Rouge, Louisiana70804
Re: House Bill No. 962 by Representative Peterson
Creates the Educational Facilities Fund
Dear Mr. Speer:
House Bill No. 962 creates an Educational Facilities Fund in the State Treasury, opening the doorfor state funding of local school buildings. The funding of public school facilities has traditionallybeen a local responsibility driven by the needs and wishes of citizens in each school district.
Funding is provided through the approval of local efforts and limited discretionary monies receivedby the school systems from the state’s Minimum Foundation Program (MFP). In addition to fundingfrom the enrollment-based MFP formula, increased revenues raised through local efforts are eligible for reward funding in which the state contributes a match, thereby providing school systems witheven more discretionary money.
The state currently has existing documented needs and obligations that are not being met, such asthe unfunded accrued liability of statewide retirement systems, the deferred maintenance of roads,and outstanding deferred maintenance of state buildings. While I support giving local schoolsystems greater flexibility in securing financing for educational facilities, including the ability topartner with businesses and community organizations that seek to invest in local public schools, thisbill would represent a fundamental shift and would open the door to a very costly state-funded schoolfacilities program.
Because of the outstanding needs of this state and the constitutional limit on net state tax supporteddebt, I have vetoed House Bill No. 962 and hereby return it to the House of