Only search Bayoubuzz
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter
Privacy assured
For Email Marketing you can trust


Article Written on: Friday-February-20-2009 BuzzBoards Calendar Contact Advertise About
Front Page Politics State National Business Technology Sports Entertainment



Governor Jindal Refuses Unemployment Tax In Stimulus Package


Written by: BayouBuzz Staff


Buzz Right Back----E-Mail a Friend----Print Page


BATON ROUGE – Today, Governor Bobby Jindal announced that the state will not change its law to use a part of the $787 billion federal stimulus bill that would result in an unemployment insurance tax increase on Louisiana businesses. The Governor also announced that the state will use a provision in the legislation to increase state unemployment benefits for recipients by an extra $25 per week, and reaffirmed his acceptance of the transportation funds included in the bill to fund shovel-ready transportation priorities in the state.

 

Governor Jindal said, “Our state is facing a serious budget situation and it would be irresponsible to enter into an expansion of benefits right now that would ultimately increase taxes on the very businesses we are working to support during these tough economic times.. The federal money in this bill will run out in less than three years for this benefit and our businesses would then be stuck paying the bill. We must be careful and thoughtful as we examine all the strings attached to the funding in this package. We cannot grow government in an unsustainable way.

 

“I strongly suggest that other states also look closely at this provision in the bill so they can also avoid ultimately passing on a significant tax to businesses that will be left paying for this expansion of benefits when the federal money dries up.

 

“We will use those provisions, however, that help our people and our businesses in their time of need, in a way that does not add an undue burden to the current financial situation in our state. For example, we will use a part of the legislation that will increase unemployment benefits through our existing unemployment benefit system by $25 a week to recipients, and DOTD Secretary Bill Ankner has already proposed a plan for putting the federal transportation funds in the bill to work as quickly as possible. We have shovel-ready projects ready to go. We already invested hundreds of millions of dollars in one-time surplus funds in transportation projects here last year, and if the legislature agrees to a plan, these one-time federal funds will build on that critical investment.

 

“We are continuing to review the strings attached to the funds coming to Louisiana in this legislation. I have instructed each state agency to look closely at all the provisions in the bill.”

 

State Will Not Use Provision that will Ultimately Increase Taxes on Businesses

 

The Governor said the state will not use a portion of the stimulus package that requires the state to change its law to expand unemployment insurance (UI) coverage to qualify for up to $32.8 million of the federal stimulus funding because it ultimately would result in a tax increase on Louisiana businesses. Qualifying for the $32.8 million provision is a precondition for being considered for another $65.6 million of federal unemployment insurance funds in the federal package, which would also require permanent changes to Louisiana law and additional annual spending.

 

According to the Louisiana Workforce Commission (LWC), based on claims filed during 2008, the $32.8 million would run out in under three years and from that point on, the state would be required to pass along the cost of more than $12 million a year for supporting this expansion of benefits to Louisiana businesses.

 

In fact, if the national economic downturn worsens its effect on Louisiana’s economy and unemployment figures increased in the state, the cost of this stimulus provision on Louisiana businesses could increase even further beyond the calculated $12 million annual price tag.

 

Governor Jindal said, “Increasing taxes on our Louisiana businesses is certainly not a way to stimulate our economy. It would be the exact wrong thing we could do to encourage further growth and job creation.”

 

LWC Executive Director Tim Barfield said the LWC will continue to evaluate the employment situation in Louisiana in light of the federal stimulus package. However, he said, “Our goal at the Louisiana Workforce Commission is to help make Louisiana a better place to do business. Increasing unemployment taxes on businesses when they might already be struggling to keep their employees on the payroll would be counterproductive.”

 

The Louisiana Association of Business and Industry (LABI) also opposes acquiescing to the requirements for receipt of the federal unemployment compensation (UC) funds provided in the stimulus legislation.  LABI Employee Relations Council Director Jim Patterson explained, “LABI has for decades diligently worked to protect the solvency of Louisiana’s unemployment compensation trust fund.  The terms of the stimulus bill put that solvency in jeopardy, risking higher employer taxes and lower weekly unemployment benefits.”

 

“Employers, who are the exclusive funding source for unemployment benefits, and unemployed workers, who are the benefit recipients, cannot afford this,“ Patterson said.  “The effect of the stimulus bill could actually be contrary to its intent.  It is also important to remember that the increased costs to our state’s UC fund would remain long after the federal dollars from the stimulus bill vanish.”

 

Provision to Increase Unemployment Benefits $25 a Week

 

The additional $25 a week for unemployment benefits provided in the federal legislation the Governor announced that the state will accept is set to take effect beginning with people already receiving benefits in the last week of February. They will be paid beginning in March, once the state’s unemployment insurance computer systems are reprogrammed.

 

Contrary to the provision that would increase taxes on Louisiana businesses, this provision of the bill is fully funded by the federal government in the stimulus package. The Louisiana Workforce Commission, which administers unemployment insurance, estimates these payments will result in approximately $71 million flowing to Louisiana’s unemployed workers through May 2010, when the program ends.

 

Transportation Funds in the Federal Bill

 

The Governor also reaffirmed his commitment to accept federal stimulus dollars coming to the state for transportation investment, subject to legislative approval. The Department of Transportation and Development has already crafted a plan to spend a significant amount of the funds on shovel-ready priority projects throughout the state.

 

The terms of the federal legislation say that half of the funds in the bill must be committed within 120 days and the rest within a year, and the Governor has instructed DOTD to meet these timelines..

(Governor Jindal Press Release)

Bayoubuzz Note: Could Louisiana pass legislation to sunset when the provision ends?  Governor Jindal said "The federal money in this bill will run out in less than three years for this benefit and our businesses would then be stuck paying the bill. We must be careful and thoughtful as we examine all the strings attached to the funding in this package."   Tell us what you think on our Buzzbacks below.

 





 












 

_____________________________________________
_________________Advertisement________________

______________________________________________



 


Bookmark  and or share this article with:
Delicious reddit Digg Facebook StumbleUpon



Comments from BayouBuzz readers

And on this day in 1982, the last and final episode of "The Lawrence Welk Show" aired…… Perhaps David Bowie had it right................Oh yeah,, Mm,,, Still don't know what I was waiting for…. And my time was running wild - a million dead-end streets….. And every time I thought Id got it made - it seemed the taste was not so sweet……. So I turned myself to face me - - - but I’ve never caught a glimpse……. Of how the others must see the faker- - I’m much too fast to take that test……………Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes, - - - - (turn and face the strain)….Ch-ch-changes - - - Dont want to be a richer man,,,, Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes, - - - - (turn and face the strain)…… Ch-ch-changes - - - - Just gonna have to be a different man…….. Time may change me - - - - But I cant trace time…………..I watch the ripples change their size, - But never leave the stream……… Of warm impermanence - - - - So the days float through my eyes, but still the days seem the same…… And these children that you spit on - - - As they try to change their worlds,,,,, Are immune to your consultations - - - - Theyre quite aware of what theyre going through……. Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes, - - - - (turn and face the strain)….Ch-ch-changes - - - - -Dont tell them to grow up and out of it……… Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes, - - - - (turn and face the strain)….Ch-ch-changes……. Where’s your shame? - - - Youve left us up to our necks in it…….Time may change me, - - - But you cant trace time…………………….Strange fascination, fascinating me….. Ah changes are taking the pace Im going through - - - - - Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes, - - - - (turn and face the strain)….Ch-ch-changes - - - Oh, look out you rock n rollers……… Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes, - - - - (turn and face the strain)….Ch-ch-changes…. Pretty soon now youre gonna get a little older - - - - Time may change me - - - But I cant trace time…… I said that time may change me - - - - But I cant trace time…………. Ya think?
Written by   on 2/25/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Perhaps on this day in 1957 Buddy Holly & the Crickets had a premoniton….. They recorded "That'll Be the Day"….. The first two stanzas are sort of interesting….. Well, that'll be the day - When you say goodbye….Yes, that'll be the day - When you make me cry……You say you gonna leave,,,,,, You know it's a lie /// 'Cause that'll be the day - when I die……. Well, you give me all your lovin' and your turtle dovin',,,, All your hugs and kisses - and your money too,,,, Well, you know you love me, baby, Still you tell me, maybe That some day, well, I'll be blue………………………………. Well folks, WE started singen’; “Bye – bye Miss American Pie…………………………..
Written by   on 2/25/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


An amusing thing about this particular day I suppose is that on this day in history, 1932 an immigrant named Adolf Hitler was granted German citizenship……… Now all of a sudden it is trendy or fashionable to elect people who are not generationally steeped or rooted into positions of leadership that decide the fates and fortunes of the nation that is electing them… You know folks, there is a bit of wisdom in the saying that history tends to repeat itself……..
Written by   on 2/25/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Meanwhile a lot of people seem to think that a whole bunch of ‘Change’ is happening…. On this day in 1870 Hiram Revels, a black man from Mississippi was sworn in as the 1st black member of Congress (Senator)…. That was a long, long, long time ago……. But keep overlooking the obvious folks….
Written by   on 2/25/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


This must be some great mystical day where bankers and money people are concerned, because on this day in 1863 Congress created the national banking system, or the 'comptroller of currency'.....
Written by   on 2/25/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


On this day in 1862, Many years after the same day in 1791, paper currency (greenbacks) were introduced in the US by President Abraham Lincoln......
Written by   on 2/25/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


and of course on this day in 1791 the 1st Bank of US chartered.... Congress is still trying to figure out how to nationalize them.... But it would appear that day is comming soon.
Written by   on 2/25/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


on this day in 1751 the 1st performing monkey was exhibited in America, it occured in New York City and the admission was 1¢..... Thank gawd Congress was finally able to get this massive social problem under control.......
Written by   on 2/25/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


It is not politics we should be focused on but rather 'policies' coupled with cause and effects or affects....... You distinguish between the two and all of a sudden the mirror isn't so smokie when looking for a glimpse of a true reflection of U.S. <us> Nayuck-nuck-nuck-nuck-nuck.......
Written by   on 2/25/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


A fair point Sid - but I think we both wanted people to pay more attention to politics. I think that's starting to happen. Hopefully many of these programs will be rolled back in a few years - probably after this country hits an economic "brick wall." I just love the message this administration sends out; be foolish, and those who were not will have the fruits of their responsibility taken to cover the errors caused by your greed or ignorance. So, I guess we desire less responsibility and more ignorance and greed. I hope so, because we always get more of whatever government subsidizes. Let's just see how that works out.
Written by kpf on 2/23/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Well, one good one out of how many?
Written by Sid on 2/23/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I am very pleased with President Obama's appointment of Earl Devaney as the Recovery Act I.G. (whatever the actual title may be). This man cleaned up the Mineral Management Service (he called it "a culture of substance abuse and promiscuity")and is ideal (basically an inquisitor "true believer" type) for this position. I applaud the president for this appointment. Perhaps the taxpayers' will not be fleeced as badly as I thought ("perhaps" that is, we'll see).
Written by kpf on 2/23/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Ron Paul would make a great Treasury Secretary, but he pays his taxes so he's not qualified.
Written by Sid on 2/23/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Although I disagree with Ron Paul on matters such as abortion, I do like his ideas on sound money and keeping our troops at home. I do not think he would solve the problem of "Bush's" troop deployment with more troop deployment, nor would he solve the problem of "Bush's" deficit spending with more deficit spending, nor solve "Bush's" problem of artificially high prices by spending money to keep prices artificially high. No, I'm proud - despite our differences on some issues - to say he's "my boy." Or considering the contributions I have made to his campaign, that I'm "his boy." "Conspiracy theory kooks" such as myself and Mr. Paul believe that the wealthy bankers control BOTH political parties and that both parties will carry out the issues important to these wealthy few (they could care less about other issues such as gay marriage, abortion, etc.). Those wiser than us realize the two parties are independent (at least, YOUR party is) and are certainly not beholden to any "Big Money" campaign contributors, they (YOUR party that is) represent the "little people." Thank goodness for that, if the uber-wealthy did actually control both parties, then we'd have no hope of government actually working for the people.
Written by kpf on 2/23/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


C'mon kpf - Silent on sending 17,000 troops to fight the war on terror? Hardly. You conveniently failed to mention where the troops are being sent. Of course you know where the war began which is still unfinished, contrary to what the previous administration obviously led you to believe. So, despite what you want to believe, the previous administration got us into this mess and somebody has to fix it and it looks like we may have a shot at it now by sending the troops to where they should have stayed in the first place.
Written by GotItRight on 2/23/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


"why are you silent on Barak Obama sending 17,000 troops to fight the War on Terror".....Not silent, KP...... do not like it at all. (You shoulda left your computer screen over the weekend to watch Bill Maher on HBO...Your boy, Ron Paul, was on.)... I totally disagree with the troop deployment...Bring them all home.
Written by KjunLady on 2/23/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


One last thing on "principles" and being honest enough to criticize BOTH parties. You "peace-niks" out there, why are you silent on Barak Obama sending 17,000 troops to fight the "War on Terror"? Is it because you support the "War on Terror" now? I guess you must, because I KNOW I would hear howls from the left if George Bush had sent these troops over. So "I guess" those who were pacifists before this last election are a bit more bloodthirsty now; what else could it be? Could it be they agree with every move that every Democrat takes?
Written by kpf on 2/22/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


What makes sense to me is the right balance between the wealth our free market creates and having social safety nets. Ever notice how hard someone works when they own their own business? Ever notice how government employees often have a "I don't give a $#it" attitude? There may be some significance there .. or perhaps not.
Written by kpf on 2/22/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I hardly agree with "most" things Republicans do, let alone "all." When it comes to a one time windfall, I believe it is foolish to establish a permanent outlay (such as adding employees) for funds that are only there short term. This is my belief regardless of which party holds office (that's what a "principle" means to me, it holds true regardless of the skin color, sex, party affiliation of the "players" involved; or the circumstances {"economic crises"}). If Jindal is right about the "strings" attached then - IMHO - he's doing the right thing, if he's wrong he is being foolish. I'm sure the truth - either way - will come out soon.
Written by kpf on 2/22/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Okay, KP-- "the Federal Govt is broke"..... Yeah, yeah.. so, what's Jindal trying to prove? Wants to throw back our nibbles, so he can be canonized? stupid politics... C'mon, KP.... you can't agree with every move that every Republican takes-- especially one as transparent as this... (Was this the brain-child of Roger Villere?...<shaking head>.... Jindal better start being his own man)...Even Conservatives are keeping "hush" on this one....LOL
Written by KjunLady on 2/22/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


The Federal government is broke - they do not have a dime to "lend." All they can do is take money from those who work, print money which devalues the dollar, and create debt that steals from generations yet unborn. What kind of "principles" is that?
Written by kpf on 2/22/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Meet the Press exposed Jindal for being a hypocrite. The monies he's refusing is the same money he's begged to borrow before- Twice!(GRRR)... Bobby Jindal is showing a very unattractive side to himself... Refusing the 78+ million is obvious posturing. How many of us in Louisiana really agree with our governor's "PRINCIPLE?" ('cept KP)...pffft....(Is THIS how a politician gets votes?.... <raised eyebrows>.. I think Jindal has reached his pinnacle.
Written by KjunLady on 2/22/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I'm sure it's not far fetched at all. Governmental power - when abused - is the worst form of tyranny. I imagine in the future government will be much more transparent than what we have today. We may not live to see it but I do have faith in mankind, we're smart enough not to trust those of us who attain these easily-abused positions of power.
Written by kpf on 2/21/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


And Kp, the "100000 Community Police Officers"? was a good point… Now consider a policing entity that is dependent upon such a welfare boon that is faced with the prospects of not being able to keep buying new police cars, and donuts etc., etc., etc. when the ‘gimmies’ dissapear and is then manipulated by private concerns to put some ‘policing’ muscle (illegal of course, but hey, whatever) on a business or someone that may be or become a competitor to their concerns……. All so that key folks can stay in the position of power within its hierarchy….. That isn’t farfetched, I know because it happened to me……
Written by   on 2/21/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I am going to agree with DQ when he notices that Jindoo is grandstanding as usual.... One of Bobbie's little staffy-groupies hedges was something along the lines of; " we might get stuck with $12 million a year for supporting this expansion of benefits to Louisiana businesses after 3 years." Well guess what slick, at $10.00 an hour wages, and only 1.3% that means somewhere around 40,000 workers employed can come up with the 12 million per year in question for the states unemployment insurance program on the federal end if it leaves town........ Is the state saying that there isn't going to be 40,000 workers? Now take that token $25 Booby wants to offer instead..... 40,000 workers, times 26 weeks, times 25 dollars equals?........... 26 MILLION DOLLARS!!!!!! So it sort of makes me scratch my head and wonder, WHO IS SCREWING WHO??? THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH MAKING SURE THAT THERE IS AN HONEST AND FAIR UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE SYSTEM IN PLACE...... ESPECIALLY SINCE IT IS GOVERNER, GOVERMENT POLICIES THAT HAS CAUSED SO MANY OF THE JOBS TO DISSAPEAR........................
Written by   on 2/21/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I do remember the Community Policing Program of the Clinton Administration. It was successful. Crime dropped. It started rising again after the Bush Administration ended the program.
Written by David Quidd on 2/21/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Jindal is grandstanding. The provision he is rejecting was designed for states with severe unemployment. If Jindal doesn't want the money, some other state will. The truth is Jindal would not have to make permanent changes to the law to receive these benefits which are temporary. A temporary change in the law is all that is necessary. This confirms that Jindal is a heartless idealogue.
Written by David Quidd on 2/21/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Remember Bill Clinton's "100000 Community Police Officers"? This plan - part of the '94 Crime bill - had the Federal Government paying 100% for these officers the first year, 75% the 2nd (with the local city or county paying the remainder), 50% the 3rd, 25% the 4th and after that the local community had to pay 100% of the costs (not to mention retirement costs, etc). "Free" right? No "strings" attached, right? If you do not understand that such "freebies" from the Feds carry costs that your local government cannot afford long-term, there's a good chance you took out a mortgage and now are in need of a bailout.
Written by kpf on 2/20/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


In 2005, Louisiana recieved $1.78 in Federal funds for every $1.00 in Federal taxes. Obviously since the hurricanes, it must be way more than that now. Perhaps Mr. Jindal should stand by his convictions and eschew federal funding altogether. I mean if you are going to advocate lower taxes and so called fiscal responsibility, why not go all the way. I think I smell a hypocrite..
Written by John on 2/20/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


We does not mean HE therefore when he says “ We cannot grow government in an unsustainable way.” He's talking about Obama, not the fact that he has grown State government in an unsustainable way. Don't blame me I voted for Tony G!
Written by Tony G on 2/20/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


If one can forget "personalities", "party", "possible political motives" and simply judge matters on their merits, it is reasonable for a governor to oppose using one time (or "limited" time) funds to create permanent overhead on his state's budget.
Written by kpf on 2/20/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


heLp mE mR.wIzARRDdddddd!, HeLP Meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee......
Written by   on 2/20/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


- - - - - “In fact, if the national economic downturn worsens its effect on Louisiana’s economy and unemployment figures increased in the state, the cost of this stimulus provision on Louisiana businesses could increase even further beyond the calculated $12 million annual price tag.” - - -- Yeah, real smart, instead of preparing for a potential ‘economic downturn worsening, (which the odds are it is a distinct possiblity) the state needs to instead do just like it did with coastal protection pre Katrina and bury its head in the mud and do imprudent things so that when the sh^t does hit the fan everyone is standing around with there thumbs up their azz and cry to the feds for more help we think we ‘deserve’….. smooth going there Booby…. Louisiana State unemployment tax to the employer is like 1.3% of payroll or something like that….. So…. If a worker is making 10 bucks an hour, he kicks 13 cents an hour into the fund….. So in other words, a worker making $20,800.00 a year all of a sudden finds itself laid off due to ‘downturn’ or whatever…… it equals and extra $214.00 per year so that this person can be “sort of” ‘protected’ for around 26 weeks or so…… I will tell you, if a little percentage bump on unemployment is going to keep an employer from locating in our state, I don’t think our citizens needs a business like that around……….. What Booby boy should be focusing on is the workman’s comp rates if he is concerned about ‘workers’ or employers….. Some brackets/billets/slots – job descriptions are 40% and MORE above of payroll…..
Written by   on 2/20/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


The extra $25.00 a week will be paid beginning in March, once the state’s unemployment insurance computer systems are reprogrammed. Let's see now, it is going to cost the state $400K to set up a stupid little website for the states education department, I WONDER HOW MUCH IT IS GOING TO COST TO 'REPROGRAM' THE STATE'S UNEMPOLYMENT INSUTRANCE COMPURTER SYSTEMS??? That Boobie, what a 'technocrat'....
Written by   on 2/20/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


And there you have it folks.... When Jindal says; "We cannot grow government in an unsustainable way." you now understand what his priorities are..... So be happy with your $25 bucks a week, he figures that is all you are worth while he 'Grows' "government"....
Written by   on 2/20/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE






Related Articles

Landry Announces for Louisiana 3rd Congressional Seat

Governor Jindal Says Louisiana Medicaid Fix Can Be In Stand-Alone Legislation

Ex-Louisiana Governor Blanco Joins State Democratic Executive Committee

Louisiana US Senate Race: Vitter, Melancon Camps Battle Polls

Louisiana Business Crais: New Orleans, Baton Rouge Healthcare Industries

Also by this Author


Louisiana: Major Floods Predicted, Tiger Woods, Karl Rove And New Orleans, Budget Woes

New Orleans Mayor-Elect Landrieu To Announce More Taskforces

New Orleans Politics: Beaten At Batt

Louisiana Food: Holly Clegg And Shrimp Remoulade

Louisiana Sen. Landrieu Comments On FCC Nation Broadband Plan





Sitemap
Advertise Buzzback Calendar About
Business Politics State National Sci/Tech Entertainment Sports World
© 2006-2007 BAYOUBUZZ.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



006 BAYOUBUZZ.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED