Only search Bayoubuzz
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter
Privacy assured
For Email Marketing you can trust


Article Written on: Wednesday-January-27-2010 BuzzBoards Calendar Contact Advertise About
Front Page Politics State National Business Technology Sports Entertainment



Landrieu Health Care Deal Blows Up On Louisiana


Written by: John Maginnis


Buzz Right Back----E-Mail a Friend----Print Page


    At the time, the $300 million in Medicaid relief for Louisiana that Sen. Mary Landrieu had inserted into the Senate healthcare bill was seen as a testament to her political gamesmanship by friend and foe alike. But that was just the half of it, for the so-called "Louisiana Purchase" later was credited with a feat that few thought possible: electing a Republican to the U.S. Senate from Massachusetts.

   In the aftermath of Scott Brown's huge upset victory last week, some Bay State politicos claim that voter disgust with Democratic deals on the healthcare bill--the Louisiana concession foremost among them--helped to propel Brown's late surge in the polls. Though not the biggest factor, it still counted in the Republican's 100,000-vote margin of victory, which now denies Senate Democrats their filibuster-proof majority and stalls the healthcare bill in its tracks.

   It's not over yet for the Senate bill, vows Landrieu, but it could be for Louisiana's Medicaid fix. If Democrats retreat to the drawing board, the state's $300 million is a prime candidate to be erased. Landrieu will fight to keep it, but her leverage is discounted if she is no longer the 60th vote.

   If the president and the Democrats use the controversial "budget reconciliation" maneuver, requiring only 51 votes to pass a scaled-back version, or if they reach a compromise to win some Republican support, Landrieu's vote won't be needed.

   What a revolting development that would be for Landrieu, who was labeled a prostitute by right-wing critics, to get nothing out of this but grief.

   Back home, opponents of the bill who are so angry at her should instead send her flowers for aiding their cause. They won't, of course, and would still like to recall her, though the U.S. Constitution, which allows only Congress to expel a member, stands in the way.

   She will answer for her vote when or if she seeks re-election in 2014.  According to polling, she went against a majority of her constituents, but not for $300 million.

   Though a long holdout, Landrieu wanted coverage for the uninsured through a bill she could abide, which she mostly got with the elimination of the public option. What she also got for Louisiana was only what it deserved, a temporary Medicaid rate adjustment so that the state would not be penalized for its temporary hurricane recovery economy. It was hardly her idea but rather Gov. Bobby Jindal's No. 1 ask to the congressional delegation, of which Landrieu had the only clout.

   The governor would rather the state's fix be attached to another bill, but he wasn't in position to choose.

   The $300 million would not solve the state's whole Medicaid problem, but it would spare the governor and Legislature, not to mention healthcare providers and poor sick people, much grief of their own.

   Despite hostility back home provoked by her vote, Landrieu remains the go-to person in Washington for the Republican governor, and will be so long as Democrats control the Senate.

   On another vital healthcare issue, she was the major player in resolving the impasse between the state and the Federal Emergency Management Agency over reimbursement for Katrina's damage to Charity Hospital in New Orleans. Had the dispute taken its normal bureaucratic course, it would be tied up in court for years. Instead, Landrieu, with the administration's support, got Congress to order binding arbitration between the state, asking for $493 million, and FEMA, whose last offer was $150 million. The hearing wrapped up last week and a final decision has come out today awarding Louisiana 474.8 million which was close to what the state requested.

Prior to the resolution,  Jindal  promised "shovels in the ground this year" for construction of a LSU teaching hospital in New Orleans, alongside the planned Veterans Administration Hospital on 70 acres near downtown.  Even before the arbitration decision,  the governor said it will be up to the medical complex's governing board to make the numbers work with what can be raised in the bond market.

   When ground is broken on the project, credit should go to Landrieu for moving it off the dime, though she knows by now not to expect much.

 

 





 












 

_____________________________________________
_________________Advertisement________________

______________________________________________



 


Bookmark  and or share this article with:
Delicious reddit Digg Facebook StumbleUpon



Comments from BayouBuzz readers

It is sort of odd there Kp but I would suppose that the crux of all my posts would be this; Folks need to work together to cause things to be better for all..... And yes, I firmly believe in the free market... And when government, whatever form it takes be it the Presisdent of the United States all the way down to and everything in between the dog catcher does something, or fails to do something that diminishes that ideals ability to function, well then, sooner or later there is hell to pay on someones' or a collective group of someones' part or parts... This heightened, enlightened, age of technolgy and innovative prowess we live in is being governed by antiqutated philosophies, attitudes, and concerns.... And it is important sometimes to realize that you can't always get what you want, you can't always get what you want, but if you try sometimes, you just might find, you get what you need............................ I suppose the paradigm there is it all depends on who or what it is that experiences the ephiphany of understanding what it needs truly is..........
Written by   on 2/4/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


A gallon of water in the middle of the desert - far from any roads - is worth more than a gallon of water next to a fresh water stream? Oh, I don’t know about that Oh but fer the luv of semantics there Kp, I guess a .45 caliber bullet costs around a buck, and if I were to have a model 1911 Colt 45 on me that one of those trusty little attitude pills could be loaded in after encountering someone that claimed the water was worth $100 gallon while I crawled around dying of thirst, I am pretty sure I could negotiate on that price a little… I mean hell, even if the seller had a shotgun, I am sure the seller would have to go to sleep sometime or another… So now or later would be my attitude. After all, if I am crawling around in the desert I am pretty sure I have some time on my hands to kill, so really, the waiting is no big deal and it would probably lend some satisfaction when it came time for me to realize any expectations and a wait was involved. Kind of puts a new definition to the phrase ‘take it or leave it’ now doesn’t it?
Written by   on 2/3/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


A gallon of water in the middle of the desert - far from any roads - is worth more than a gallon of water next to a fresh water stream. If government DENIES people charging MORE to provide the gallon of water in the desert location ... it won't be there. Without government price controls more and more water will be brought into the "dry" region by those seeking increased profit, the prices will go down due to supply and demand, not some government price control to prevent "price gouging." There is no such thing as "price gouging" in fact. The ONLY reason anyone can charge what others think is a too high price is because the demand is far greater than supply can meet. God will not provide the need, the government will not provide the need, but high prices will attract those in search of greater profit to ship the temporary higher than normal priced commodity to where it is needed. Prices will have the effect of getting what is needed, where it is needed far better than some loser in government can ever do. "Fairness" - "greed" - and "price gouging" are not applicable to market forces. What people are willing to pay for a given commodity at any given place and time is what something is worth. Much of what government does is based on "the people don't know what is best for them, but we do" - again, the arrogant intellectual pinhead asserting his authority over the "uneducated masses."
Written by kpf on 2/2/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


- - - - “No "control" is not what I advocate at all. "Supply and demand" is what I advocate. After a hurricane high prices on gasoline and housing will bring in MORE gasoline and housing than "good intentions" or "planning" or "control" or "prayer" or wearing some dumbass ribbon will ever do.” - - - - Kp, please put the bong down and focus for a second…….. “………..high prices on gasoline and housing will bring in MORE gasoline and housing than "good intentions" or "planning" or "control" or "prayer" or wearing some dumbass ribbon will ever do.” Is like saying that charging folks $20.00 for a dozen eggs will make more people eat eggs and charging triple or quadruple for a house will put more roofs over more peoples heads….. So much for your supply and demand theory, because it is in effect based on ‘price gouging’….. All I am merely saying is to reduce the costs of projects will mean less tax dollars are needed to do a project, therefore a freedom of choice emerges, build the project, save tax dollars, or build the project and take the tax dollars saved and build more projects, or build the project and take the tax dollars saved and build more projects, and with additional tax dollars confiscated from the taxpayers build even more projects or take care of even more needs……. It’s sort of simple when it comes to housing also….. Pay $30.00 a square foot construction costs or pay $90.00 a square foot for construction costs. Doesn’t matter, the carpenters are going to make the same amount whether they build the $30.00 psf or the $90.00 psf. But the neat thing is, with the $60.00 psf savings you can either put it into retirement, or you can go out and buy t.v.’s, cars, stoves, dishes, braces for the kids teeth, a steak dinner, a caribean cruise, what ever floats your boat. It is then that you truly have a supply and demand model going… A hurricane is sort of like congress or politicians, just a big windbag that forces people to spend more money than they need to on things. Wutever…….
Written by   on 2/2/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


No "control" is not what I advocate at all. "Supply and demand" is what I advocate. After a hurricane high prices on gasoline and housing will bring in MORE gasoline and housing than "good intentions" or "planning" or "control" or "prayer" or wearing some dumbass ribbon will ever do. All government can do is create a surplus (such as subsidies on crops whereby consumers must pay more for food, and it is also a misallocation of resources <duh ... "surplus=unneeded, no?>) or create a shortage (such as rent control which causes property values to rise and is counter productive to the stated aim of creating "affordable housing"). Government cannot "control" the forces of supply and demand, hence the long lines for goods wanted by people, and the thriving black market in the U.S.S.R. My "Constitutional spiel" consists primarily of this: the Constitution promises to promote "equal opportunity" - not "equal outcome." Statists believe it is government's job to "make things fair" and provide a certain "level of subsistance" for the people. So take a good look at New orleans, where the people whine and complain when things go bad that "government isn't doing enough" to help them. I cannot help but think: "WTF are YOU doing to help YOURSELF?" What government "help" has created is no incentive to be responsible. No education? No job? No problem, have a half dozen kids. "Somebody else" will pay for it. We're in need of a serious 'attitude adjustment" - it may only come about when the shite hits the fan. Keep your powder dry.
Written by kpf on 2/2/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


“If people are willing to pay $5 a gallon for gasoline, and you sell it for a dollar a gallon, then someone will buy all you've got at a dollar a gallon and then turn around and sell it for a 400% profit.” - - - - Yeah, they probably will buy all that I’ve got, I made my money, and they get the American Opportunity to risk an investment in the hopes they can sell at $5.00 a gallon. And the only way they will be able to sell at $5.00 a gallon is if some form of governmental control is put into place to keep someone from selling at $4.00 or $3.00 or $2.00 or $1.10 a gallon. So much for your free market concept, or your Constitutional spiel… Your argument is based on control…. And meanwhile, the farmer that has to pay $5.00 a gallon for fuel cannot get his tomatoes to market because transport costs are prohibitive, and the farmer who only pays $1.00 per gallon gets his tomatoes to market and the $5.00 a gallon farmer needs even more government ‘control’ or programs, or aid set up to subsidize it and all in order to keep the prices up… Meanwhile, the person that can’t afford to buy $5.00 tomatoes has to settle for a ketchup sandwich instead of a tomato sandwich and then one day gets pissed off and decides to rob a bank so it can get a tomato sandwich and in the process kills two innocent bystanders and one guy that is depositing $5.00 a gallon proceeds into his bank account… Yeah Kp, keep the controls in place and then bitch when the plan unravels and folks find out that they were being taken advantage of by opportunists and decided that instead of robbing banks they will just get their Congressman to pass more laws to protect them… Laws, laws, laws, laws… The more we oppress or depress the more we digress…………………………..
Written by   on 2/2/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


If people are willing to pay $5 a gallon for gasoline, and you sell it for a dollar a gallon, then someone will buy all you've got at a dollar a gallon and then turn around and sell it for a 400% profit. Prices vary due to circumstances. Prices based on a government "plan" will lead to either surpluses or shortages, either one reflecting a misuse of funds. It is not "semantics" to believe that consumers better determine "what needs to be produced" and "what price it will sell at" than to believe that our oh so wise government officials can determine these things. The first happens "automatically" without any planning or having government eat up taxpayer dollars, whereas the latter not only eats up tax dollars but is innefficient in providing consumers what they want.
Written by kpf on 2/2/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, again Kp, semantics. You say tomato, I say tomatoe, wut ever... All I know is You can sit around all day long trying to sell a gallon of gas for 30 dollars because you happen to be on the scene first. And maybe you will sell 2 or 3 gallons. Or, you can sell gasoline for a buck a gallon and just make sure you brought plenty of gas with you because lots of folks are going to buy it to get on their way and start getting things done at that price. And if you have your affairs in order, there should be a profit involved that covers the expenses associated with doing business and you can put some gas in your tank and get the things you want as well..... The work less and earn more mentality does have its limits in practical applications there Kp, after that all a person becomes is an opportunist........ and they are an even more loathsome parisitical leach than the fief, the taxcollector or the 'thief' --------- Wutever.... I'm hungry, gotta go get something to eat. But it is Monday, so I am going to eat a Bologna sandwich instead of a Chinese buffet @ $10.00....
Written by   on 2/1/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Where there is need it will be met - if "the price is right." Morons call elevated prices of essentials like gasoline and water following a hurricane "price gouging" - whereas I see these elevated prices as an INDICATOR. An indication that "more of this is needed in this particular area at this particular time." What these people don't understand (in their self righeous condemnation of "greed")is that temporary high prices will move goods faster and in greater quantities than "good will" would ever accomplish (dat's just how it be).Higher prices will bring in MORE of what is needed. During "normal" times, consumers will buy goods as cheap as they can find them. Those (eh ... that would be our elected officials and the dupes who put them in office) who think they can defeat "supply and demand" by government decree or "control prices" (without causing either shortages or surplus) or "create jobs" in the private sector by taking money out of the private sector do far more harm than good. These same fools think we can get out of debt by creating more debt (duh?). As far as Mr. Edison's light bulb or your product, I still fail to see where I (me personally) am in the slightest way responsible for initiating those - or any other product - acceptance by government. Forget about government, try marketing your product in the private sector. Oh, BTW, I was only joking about bribing a politician to get your product used by the state. No dig on you personally, rather an indictment of how things "get done" in government.
Written by kpf on 2/1/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


That's sort of like saying you aren't part of your community there Kp. If you didn't spend your dollars at the local store, and everyone else did the same, sooner or later there would be no local store, and eventually there would be no community because they would have to go elsewhere to get what they need. You are a taxpayer. You piss and moan about paying taxes to a wasteful entity, and when an answer comes along you want to play word games. That's just like standing around a well and pissing and moaning that you are thirsty. If you want some relief you at least need to toss the bucket that is tied to a rope in so that you can draw some refresing water back out. It takes a little bit of effort, believe it or not....
Written by   on 2/1/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


What if I did avocate that product or any other for government to use? They don't listen to me - or any other of the people. They listen to their big campaign contributors. I'm not part of that group.
Written by kpf on 2/1/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


 
Written by kpf on 2/1/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


In fact, speaking of oil, it is funny as hell because I guess all that people think that comes from oil is gasoline or heating oil. Oil exploration was first dwelved upon as a replacement for whale oil which was used in the lamps. Kerosene was the coveted 'refined' byproduct (because the light bulb hadn't been invented yet, and there really wasn't much need or use for electricity yet) of that endeavor. And of course grease and parphine. At first, gasoline was a 'nuseance' by product of the refining process and it was pretty much just dumped into rivers or out on the ground to get rid of it. It wasn't until the invention of the internal combustion engine that any practical use for that by product was 'discovered'. And of course with the 'discovery' of rayon and plastics, well, the oil and gas industry literally shot for the moon.... Yeah, evolution, change, realization, all those things have cognitive value in society. Just depends on how it is harnessed and to what means it is applied towards... who knows?
Written by   on 2/1/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I appreciate the thought there Kp, I guess you sort of missed out on the purpose or intent though. Done been through the route of the 'cut' or the 'skim' or the 'vig' or whatever you want to call it... Yeah probably shot myself in the foot for deciding not to pursue that route, but I guess I would rather shoot myself in the foot than stab you in the back... How undiplomatic of me.... Ehhhh, scruples, what a whimsical emotion... Oh well.. And as far as your 'ethical' standing, or ethics or whatever it is you want to call it, Yeah you are probably right there Kp, why would you want to advocate something that would provide jobs, lower taxes, provide addtional protection from the elements by talking about something you have no 'first hand experience with'? I mean hell, you probably don't have first hand experience with Ammonia, Anesthetics, Antihistamines, Artificial limbs, Artificial Turf, Antiseptics, Aspirin, Auto Parts, Awnings, Balloons, Ballpoint pens, Bandages, Beach Umbrellas, Boats, Cameras, Candles, Car Battery Cases, Carpets, Caulking, Combs, Cortisones, Cosmetics, Crayons, Credit Cards, Curtains, Deodorants, Detergents, Dice, Disposable Diapers, Dolls, Dyes, Eye Glasses, Electrical Wiring Insulation, Faucet Washers, Fertilizers, Fishing Rods, Fishing Line, Fishing Lures, Food Preservatives, Food Packaging, Garden Hose, Glue, Hair Coloring, Hair Curlers, Hand Lotion, Hearing Aids, Heart Valves, Ink, Insect Repellant, Insecticides, Linoleum, Lip Stick, Milk Jugs, Nail Polish, Oil Filters, Panty Hose, Perfume, Petroleum Jelly, Plastics Rubber Cement, Rubbing Alcohol, Shampoo, Shaving Cream, Shoes, Toothpaste, Trash Bags, Upholstery, Vitamin Capsules, Water Pipes, Yarn, etc., etc., etc.... Or do you? Funny thing is all the things listed above (including the politicians) have something in common in many instances with you, they are currently dependent upon oil to a certain extent for their existence. You see Kp, my website was lain out in a fashion so that a broad variety of people could get to the fundementals. Those that only understand pictures, those that only understand numbers, those that wonder about politics, those that wonder about taxes, etc., etc., etc. In fact, and interestingly enough, there are not to many subjects or articles that the Bayou Buzz can put forth that Strongconcrete isn't in some way applicable to. That is, if you think about it. And there aren't too many posts you make, that somehow, Strongconcrete isn't a partial solution for. It all boils down to numbers. So sad it is when encountering folks that seek and yet do not know what it is they are searching for. I guess it is called CONFUSION. Peace out dude.
Written by   on 2/1/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


How about this? Find a crooked politician who has influence over having your product used in any government project(shouldn't be hard to do) and offer him a cut of the action (THAT part is what makes it easy). Just a thought. As far as me advocating Strongconcrete or any other product that I have absolutely no first hand experience with .... uh ... am I missing something here?
Written by kpf on 1/29/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


That sounds simply wonderful there Kp, and you know what? It doesn't matter. And do you know why? Well, folksies such as yourself, that have a certain degree of 'heightened' awareness or exposure that is a notch or perhaps even several notches above the average hillbilly sitting on a park bench exposing himself to the pigeons and little kids that flying kites in the Spring breeze and you are not even going to deal with cornerstone rudimentary problems. Rudimentary problems are right here in your backyard. Before you can lay a concrete sidewalk or path you first have to survey, grade, and level the jobsite. Damned if we do, damned if we don’t, but the facts of the matter are we, as a group of people that advocate a democratically organized and operated system of government have to elect our representative leadership. And when they screw up, or let us down, or are not putting prudent causes into effect then it is up to US to let them know of our dissatisfaction, and displeasure and to take it upon OURSELVES to redress the problem or situation if they are unwilling to do so at our bequest.. One of the main topics here at home in our backyard Kp is tax dollars, utilization, disbursement, value, etc., etc., etc. I am glad you haven’t lifted a finger to advocate STRONGCONCRETE. So in as far as your magnanimous concurrence when you add; ……………… “One thing I will agree with .. we do deserve the new reality we live in”……………… You simply need to remember, our elected officials really don’t know what to do unless you tell them. I am glad the good Lord chose to allow me to be born with a brain that was able to come up with solutions to some problems I perceived as injurious in nature to the people that surround me. And I am glad that I also have received the understanding that a person cannot help someone who is not even willing to help itself.. And so, I am satisfied that I did what I could and STRONGCONCRETE still sits on a shelf.. Oh sure, I could save the nation, and Louisiana and other states billions upon billions of tax dollars, and sure, I could provide hundreds of jobs and stimulate a segment of the economy or society, and sure, I could provide increased safety from the risks and losses involved with natural calamities, and sure there are probably 50, 60, 100, 1000 other byline benefits to society STRONGCONCRETE could allow for or provide for, but then again…. a person cannot help someone who is not even willing to help itself… So rail away at the top of the Mountain. The machinery and cog works that drive us on in perpetual toil, exhaustion, iniquity and exasperation, or you could start at the bottom, get your own state prepared, and watch the motion go upwards towards the top… More and more Kp, and don’t take this personal, but you are coming off as being the same wishy washy type of person that you harp on and are surrounded by every day. It is sad when a person loses sight and grasp of a Strong disposition. Perhaps I am as guilty as well, but, whatever, in boredom I sit around on the buzzy boreds like anything in any article, or anything I contribute will change anything anyways… Do you know why I own and maintain weaponry Kp? I’ll tell you. It’s not to protect me, they are set aside to protect my neighbors (within the mainframes of what can be construed as proper and lawful reasoning and intent which defines the application of deadly force.). You see Kp, it is the Who Dat – Who Dat – Who Dat – Me – Me – Me mentality that is dragging this unbelievably great country down the tubes. That is what is lessening our values, or successes, and at the same time increasing our despondency and apathy as a whole. We need to see what we as individuals are able to do to help the whole, and conversely it is up to the whole to see what it can do to support the individual that is trying to bring about improvements in their life. But that is simply too difficult a concept for a bunch of Who Dat – Who Dat – Who Dat – Me – Me – Me’s to grasp I suppose….. Peace out on this rainy dreary day dude….
Written by   on 1/29/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I am speaking of how the "men behind the curtain" - the big banking interests - control the policies of our government. They have the U.S. taxpayer paying for our troops to be stationed all over the world - including many locations (Europe & Japan)that are capable of taxing their OWN people to provide for their own defense - AND not only advocating "free" trade that costs us our industrial base (and high paying jobs) but ALSO they have the Fed bailing out these same European banks with U.S. taxpayer dollars (or "creating" money thereby devauling the U.S. workers wages and savings, same thing in essence). BTW, congress cannot even get an accounting of just "who" these foreign banks are and "how much" they have received (hence Ron Paul's "Audit the Fed" bill). THIS should outrage all Americans. Instead we are far more interested in ... the "tripe" that the news media throws up as "worthy of our attention." One thing I will agree with .. we do deserve the new reality we live in, we have earned it by blindly placing our trust in the people who are elected to govern our country. What MOST people had in this country one or two hundred years ago was a "default setting" of distrust for those in public office. We have "grown" since then I guess.
Written by kpf on 1/29/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


"limited government" does not include being the earth's bully.???? I don’t know about being the earth’s ‘bully’ Kp, that is a fairly vague macro summarization there…. And I do not see the sense in just rolling over and letting the global community plunder and pillage our villages to bolster their new found faith in want, craving, desire, and perhaps jealousy and greed as a result of the technologies we have exposed them to. But I do believe limited government is something we should advocate on a domestic level. Take this tax subsidized ‘V’ car venture being pushed by the Jindal administration. All it will amount will be the ongoing ‘Chicken Wars’ that were started by Lyndon B. Johnson in 1963. Oh and the ‘V’s identity? I don’t know, gee, is it the Tato Nano? I don’t know… Last spring a prototype of the ‘V’ was delivered by T. Boone Pickens to the governor’s mansion in Baton Rouge for little Bobby to look at. It’s basically a little car with a Volkswagen engine that has been sawn in half for power. So we have the India connection, the Deutschland connection, and the Louisiana/U.S.A connection, oh shades of missing ThyssenKrupp….. Yeah, we will be getting a bunch of parts over here that we don’t manufacture, and then we get to put them together, and then we get to buy them. All parts from overseas. Ohhhh but we get the wonderful Pilgrim’s Pride transplant….. And we get to pay taxes out the roof, watch more jobs go overseas, become more and more like Haiti, and other third world companies that are mostly dependent upon ‘service’ industries (you know, like after market, pull the lego blocks that we buy from a foreign country out of the box and turn them into a toy to sell in our stores while all of our capital flies out of country and doesn’t really return to cause economic growth…. Just stalemate) You think it’s bad the way our own government bullies us around, wait until you see a bunch of crazed crap lickers from other countries bullying us around……. And Jane, you need to wake up and smell the coffee....
Written by   on 1/29/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I agree with the last 2 postings. The talking heads from both sides of the media are the same. Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh are no different than the crew on msnbc. They twist the truth, leave out parts of the truth or just plain lie and seem to enjoy doing it.
Written by Jane on 1/29/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I am not a champion of the right. I do not think we need - or can afford - to be the world's policeman. Close down 90% of our overseas bases, drastically reduce the military (and all other government employees/unnecessary government expenses), end the wars (all of them) and let the people - finally - enjoy the "peace dividend" that rightfully should have been ours following WWII (or at least the end of the Marshall Plan, say, the mid-fifties or so). Government is too big, and attempts to do too much - both at home and abroad. Aslo, they generally promise far more than they can actually deliver. Limited government is the way to go, "limited government" does not include being the earth's bully.
Written by kpf on 1/29/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I agree with the comment about the liberal media, especially Olbermann. But I have to ask your thoughts about Limpy and Hannity talking about our military strategy in Iraq and Afghanistan. You don't find it rather silly and funny that a fat drughead and his wannabe like are doing all that yapping about a subject thats alien to them?? The two they haven't a clue about the difference between an F-16 and a M-16! It only shows that both sides of the media are precisely the same.
Written by Jason on 1/29/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


You won't convince Mr.Quidd that anything the Democratic Party does is wrong, don't waste your time. What is unbelievebly funny though CN is the Dems still don't get it. "It" being their far left policies being rejected by the majority of the American public. That means the midterm elections will blindside them as much as the recent Massechuettes (sp?) election did. It's like watching the coyote walk to the edge of the cliff in a Roadrunner cartoon. Clueless. Hard to think that just a year ago I was concerned about Obama and company having so much power. Now I watch Olbermann and other Dem supporters and ... well it's quite a show, quite a show. Too funny; and what a change, going from fear of what they can do to watching in amusement. I'm looking forward to the midterms as much as the Saints first Superbowl - except I have more confidence in picking the losers in the elections than in the football game.
Written by kpf on 1/29/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Mr. Quidd, why help the country go over the cliff with this legislation just so we can get Mary's payment for her vote? This is not reform legislation, it is legislation made to set the groundwork to takeover healthcare. True reform can be done with about 1,975 pages less than this monster. It's time for our delegation to get together and go get the medicare overpayment problem fixed. It is legitimate and the delegation as a whole should get this done on it's own and not tacked onto a bogus healthcare reform bill.
Written by CN on 1/28/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


- - - - New Orleans the last strong hold for Democrats in Louisiana.????????? - - - - That was sort of a dum post, all the 'Dems' are going to do to appear to be 'us' is change their pahty ticket and becum Repubs... I doubt it seriously if anything is going to change one way or another for at least 3 or 4 decades down here, and that change is probably going to come along in some kind of police state format, Louisiana oligarchy embraces that form of people contol, er, uhhh, government fully.... Ahhhh the plantation mentalities that exist.
Written by   on 1/28/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


The national GOP has probably cost Louisiana $300 million in Medicaid money that will ultimately cost Jindal and the Louisiana GOP as the state budget goes over the cliff in the next two years.
Written by David Quidd on 1/28/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Maginnis you are such the "Democrat". Trust me PAL she is toast in 2014. Take up for her all you want. New Orleans the last strong hold for Democrats in Louisiana. She is Toast. TOAST.
Written by poptoy on 1/28/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I would be ever grateful if that medicaid amendment is withdrawn, scratched or simply just disapears. We are being ridiculed for it, unjustly in my opinion. I think if Jindal and the delegation would have owned up to their share in the fix, the nation may have looked at our need differently. As it is, they think it is just a Landrieu stunt. And whats worse is many seem to think the money is going or has gone into Landrieu's pocket. How stupid can people be!
Written by Christine on 1/27/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


But the funniest thing of all if you think about it, Lottery ticket sales in Louisiana were supposed to do things for the schools only, and we know that isn't the case, and river Boat/Casino revenues were only supposed to do the roads and bridges, and we know that isn't the case, and of course the oil and gas royalties are supposed to be dedicated to offshore coastal erosion - - and typical Louisiana, you know we ain't betting on it. And of course New O never did get cat 5 protection, soooooooo, keep your life jackets handy, and then this 400 something milllion (you know, like a half billion) for an old building in New Orleans? What a joke. Guess what folks, the Feds are going to get it back one way or another, as will the other 3/4's of the taxpayers in Louisiana that do not live in New O.... Push come to shove, mud washes away faster in a rainstorm than bedrock does. Ehhh, what good does it do to warn the population of its falicies or the future that will happen when the population is crazed by babbles, beads, fake doubloons and a fake superbowl placement... Reality, it is a biotch sometimes...
Written by   on 1/27/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


What, it blew up in here face here in Louisiana? Gee, maybe we can get Bobby Jindal to go on Jay Leno so he can try to con the rest of the nation into thinking it was all her fault alone. Ha-ha-ha-ha... Wait until they start thinking about the oil and gas royalties in Federal Waters that Louisiana alone is receiving.. Then tack the 300 million onto that, and you start to see the greed appear. And Gawd help us if folks start to really wonder if this years football season was fixed..... And Steve-O with all his come-back kid hype all year long on one article or another. but then again, most folks in Amerika are becomming apethetical anyways so it probably won't matter. The tax payer expects to get cheated, and sooooo, the tax payer cheats on its taxes whenever possible.... What a sick society we live in......
Written by   on 1/27/2010
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE






Related Articles

Louisiana Politics: Vitter, Melancon, Landrieu, Budget, , Cao, Drink Ban, Tea Party

Louisiana Congr. Cao Last Stand On Health Care Vote?

Jefferson Parish Louisiana Scandals Hit Judge Race

Gov Jindal Takes on the Real Louisiana Government

Two Announced Candidates For Louisiana 3rd Congressional District

Also by this Author


Gov Jindal Takes on the Real Louisiana Government

Who Dat Say Dey Gonna Raise Dem Louisiana Motor Vehicle Fees?

Drawing Lines Before Counting Voters For Louisiana Reapportionment

Louisiana Gov. Jindal Needs a Game Plan for Higher Education

Louisiana Road Woes Remain After Highway Boss Goes





Sitemap
Advertise Buzzback Calendar About
Business Politics State National Sci/Tech Entertainment Sports World
© 2006-2007 BAYOUBUZZ.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



006 BAYOUBUZZ.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED