Only search Bayoubuzz
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter
Privacy assured
For Email Marketing you can trust


Article Written on: Tuesday-July-15-2008 BuzzBoards Calendar Contact Advertise About
Front Page Politics State National Business Technology Sports Entertainment



Louisiana Jindal Vetoes Cuts Into His Political Identity


Written by: Stephen Sabludowsky


Buzz Right Back----E-Mail a Friend----Print Page


 Again, I ask: who is the real Bobby Jindal?  Is he Dr. Jindal or Mr. Still In Hide? 

 

Is he the revolutionary who came into Louisiana mindset because the voters demanded change in social, fiscal and political policies and he was the obvious “change agent”?  Or, is he the new Louisiana Machiavellian who harbors national ambitions and hides his own true self from the public and perhaps even to himself.

 

The truth is--right now, we really do not know his own identity.  His own political fumbling has created so much doubt in the minds of the voters and in that of the legislators that the political and social climate is as polluted as was the Katrina water--weeks after the flood.

 

Right now, many legislators are seething with anger.  Without doubt, in that mix is their perceived “pay raise double cross”, their lack of faith in the Governor’s word and  motives and their legitimate or perhaps political concerns that the Louisiana citizenry is financially desperate while the Government treasury is spouting like a green fountain.    

 

They have legitimate reasons to question the Governor’s true identity.  Without doubt, he wants his base to return to his own feet and it appears that Governor Jindal has decided to play to their emotions of fiscal reform. 

 

Ironically and unfortunately, since his name is still being bantered in the national media as a “Vice President wannabe” and since he has failed to say “no” when others have done so, he is playing right into the hands of the legislators who are claiming that this “new” Bobby Jindal is merely a self-serving heartless hypocrite, willing to engage in national political showmanship while real Louisiana people suffer.

 

Some legislators are asking a legitimate question that might have a legitimate Team Jindal answer.  A number of them are asking why did the Governor on Monday go so far out of his way to cut so many programs (many which are so vital in a post-Katrina recovery) and to do so with such flair of political showmanship that it came across like he is now touting his “new-found” manhood?

 

The Governor should be praised in some respects--if he is truly believes in what he says.  Without doubt, government should never do what the private sector is able to do.  If organizations are able to raise money to sustain themselves by themselves, they should do so even if it serves the public need.  Also, the Jindal budget revolution is a clear break from the past which could be the reason for his intentionally poking Governors Blanco and Foster in the nose over their own budgetary restraints.

 

To the extent that Jindal is setting new policy demarcating the role of government and to the extent that he is doing so because is an honest believer, reality dictates that it will be a painful exercise for many at a time when the Capitol river is green with money.

 

However, if the Governor is acting for the national stage for his own personal gain, given that many of the cuts were not necessary due to immense budget surpluses, it would be one the cruelest acts by a Louisiana governor in modern age.

 

In reality, these cuts might have come at the wrong time.  Louisiana is still very much in “Katrina and Rita” mode.  There is very little money on the street in many parishes that quite a few of the not-for-profits that he cut will simply fold.  So many of them will be competing against one another for so few dollars.  It is true, there are organizations and entities that in the past have been non-deserving of government monies and there are some who should go on a fiscal diet.  Yet, many do so much public good for people who are truly struggling and it will be very bad to see those organizations unable to provide important and sometimes necessary services to the people they serve.

 

Ultimately, whether the legislative anger over the next few weeks is backed by that of the people is Question Numero Uno.  If the Louisiana citizens feel that they want the governmental services more than they want the new Jindal “lean and mean” fiscal machine, the legislators will not coalesce around a veto override in early August.   However, if the Louisiana citizens believe that this HB1 blood bath is the latest Jindal stunt, that they want the post-Katrina services, they will push their legislators into a revolt.

 

Governor Jindal can diffuse part of the possible public and legislative backlash.  If he really cares about Louisiana and not about his own political career, he would put a total end to his vice president aspirations.  By not doing so, he is only fueling the fire.  By not doing so, he is being perceived as allowing the image of the unsightly homeless under the New Orleans Claiborne and Canal Street overpass to linger as he plays for the Presidential second fiddle.  By not doing so, his message of true Louisiana reformer becomes questioned, probed and scrutinized like looking at an ugly scab.

 

The Governor can put much of the anger to rest by showing he is serious about implementing the changes in government and by absolutely staying put to carry out his policies.  By playing both sides of the field, he is speaking out of both sides of his mouth while many people truly suffer and while he risks the embarrassment of numerous veto overrides.    

 

Bobby Jindal has his own faith in his own hands.  He can hide from his own reality.  Ultimately, he will be found to be a fool unless he cuts bait with the Nationals and does the work of the Louisiana people who voted for him to be their Governor.

If you agree or disagree with this column and want to write a letter to the Bayoubuzz for publication, email us at steve@bayoubuzz.com.  Otherwise, feel free to  comment on our Buzzbacks, below.

Louisiana, New Orleans Comedy and Politics Punch Thursday--a truly great event 

Join our new dance site at http://www.bayoubuzzdance.com and tell your friends. 





 












 

_____________________________________________
_________________Advertisement________________

______________________________________________



 

 


Bookmark  and or share this article with:
Delicious reddit Digg Facebook StumbleUpon



Comments from BayouBuzz readers

Bravo to the Governor for cutting these items from the budget. Next year he needs to make additional cuts. For years the good ole boys in Baton Rouge have been buying votes with my tax dollars and I have had enough of this nonsense. Use our tax dollars to protect, to educate, to build roads and other necessary infrastructure,etc.
Written by Dave on 7/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


"Rigid ideology" - makes one think of LBJ's "Great Society" plan whereby poverty would be eliminated. Just ignore the fact that illegitimacy - along with its attendant poverty - has skyrocketed since this program's inception.
Written by but - for some reason - that's okay on 7/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Jindal's line-item vetoes follow the same pattern as the health-care cuts he made during the Foster Administration. Any program that does not fit within his arbitrary framework is eliminated regardless of it's actual merit or the lack of alternative funding. Common sense and discretion are abandoned in favor of rigid ideology.
Written by David Quidd on 7/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Well Charlotte, I'll believe that when I see the advent of STRONGCONCRETE disciplines in application...............
Written by   on 7/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Limiting dependence on government, fostering individual freedom, and cutting taxes have to start somewhere. Jindal is right to say that this philosophy takes more guts when there's a budget surplus. He's right that a budget surplus is no reason to spend money that ought to be left with the taxpayers in the local communities. Jindal is promoting a large-scale vision of small government and individual liberty. This is what we need, even if it means upsetting ingrained assumptions about how liberally money flows from Baton Rouge. We need an end to the entitlement mentality. We need a return to self-reliance. This is what Jindal is trying to give us. I hope he goes even further.
Written by Charlotte on 7/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


KPF, dear, we do agree with you. However, massive dismissal of all of these programs funding was not necessary. Accountability is the answer. We agree with you also about all of the public employees and their necessity in positions. We question also their ability and their experience when hired for these jobs. The Civil Service laws should not protect incompetents and supervisors should not be worried about termination of incompetent employees. Eddie Jourdan fired many not because of incompetence but because of discrimination. The court found this to be true and eventually, along with other circumstances, he found himself out of office. Exactly what was his experience and ability when he was appointed the U.S. Attorney and subsequently elected as D.A. Too bad we got a bad reputation as a result of his own inadequacies.
Written by RhettsWife on 7/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Unfortunately very few question politicians when they initiate a program that spends money - no matter how expensive this program may be. This is usually followed with little accountability as to just how effective this expenditure may be. Whatever the reasons for the vetoes, it is a welcome change, IMHO. It is incumbent on government to provide the needed services with the least burden on taxpayers. All too often this is not the case. I am sure many of the programs vetoed will eventually be funded if they are truly necessary. "Good riddance" to those programs which are not. As far as “government jobs” are concerned – those too should be kept only if needed, no one should have a taxpayer-funded job if their position is not absolutely necessary. Let them find work in the private sector and become someone who pays into government coffers instead of having their salary funded by taxpayers. That is, many government jobs should be temporary instead of permanent positions. The burden on taxpayers is already too large - government services at all levels (starting with foreign aid and corporate welfare) should be severely cut back.
Written by kpf on 7/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


As Jim Lettin uncovers more and more sham non-profit groups that serve only as a front for politicians skimming money for themselves and their friends I am not at all taken back by the govenor's hesitation to fund them. There are many worthy groups but there are also many that should not be classified as non-profit. In a state where contributions to a pet non-profit group was the only way to have a politician support your run for office one would ask - is that really a non-profit? Did the Jefferson's really have a non-profit? Who would have had the courage three years ago to strip public finds from the Jefferson non-profit? Thats right public funds - or let's call it what it really is - bribes. Maybe the govenor is playing games for the media and maybe he is the first govenor to stand up to the political pressure and do the honerable thing - time will tell. We need to give him that time to see what develops before we condem him.....
Written by BigD on 7/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


 
Written by BigD on 7/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Stephen, dear, we are up early this morning. We are no longer pre-Katrina but post Katrina. We think you may have made a mistake in your use of the term in this article. We say what we have always said - Pi is a political opportunist from the day one. Look at his job history and actions alone. Wake up. Yes cuts are necessary but you are right - some of these organizations are viable organizations offering hope to some still suffering from that storm. Make them accountable for how they use their funds. WDSU reported on the national guard in this city and the issue of statistics. We want accountability from the city for the use of the guard. He should be looking at that. He should look at himself and his cohorts and show accountability for his actions. He still remains the stumbling, bumbling fool, with a smirk on his face and nothing else but his future on his mind.
Written by RhettsWife on 7/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE






Related Articles

Is Louisiana Bobby Jindal Still A National Player?

Louisiana Charlie Melancon Vs. David Vitter: Closer To US Senate Match

Gov. Mark Sanford Affair Hurts Republican Party Again

Jindal, Landrieu, Louisiana Leaders: GM Shreveport Louisiana Closing

Jindal Has Mighty Duke In Louisiana GOP and Roger Villere

Also by this Author


Louisiana Independence Day: Declaring Power To The People

Louisiana Officials: Jindal Veto Was Punitive

Louisiana Politics: Charlie Melancon, David Vitter And Al Franken

Louisiana Legislature Enables Jindal Transparency Farce Horse

Jindal Has Mighty Duke In Louisiana GOP and Roger Villere





Sitemap
Advertise Buzzback Calendar About
Business Politics State National Sci/Tech Entertainment Sports World
© 2006-2007 BAYOUBUZZ.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



006 BAYOUBUZZ.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED