Only search Bayoubuzz
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter
Privacy assured
For Email Marketing you can trust


Article Written on: Tuesday-June-16-2009 BuzzBoards Calendar Contact Advertise About
Front Page Politics State National Business Technology Sports Entertainment



Roemers Takes Lead In Jindal Challenge


Written by: John Maginnis


Buzz Right Back----E-Mail a Friend----Print Page


    By now, Gov. Bobby Jindal has about had his fill of the Roemer clan. The governor's past week started and ended with members of that political family challenging his leadership on education, high school and higher.

   The big event, of course, was the extraordinary news conference at which Buddy Roemer and three other former governors--Dave Treen, Mike Foster and Kathleen Blanco--urged the sitting governor to restore funding cuts to higher education. It was an awkward if not excruciating moment for Jindal, but it beat the alternative. According to a source knowledgeable with the events, the governor's predecessors almost went public without him, which would have been a very serious rebuke.

   Roemer, distressed by Jindal's proposed budget cuts, had enlisted his three colleagues in making a joint statement of concern. Jindal got wind of the cabal and quickly arranged a meeting, and also invited the Fosters for dinner at the Mansion the night before.

   After the five met Thursday morning, Jindal opened the press conference by stressing their points of agreement. He committed to reducing state support for higher education by no more than 10 percent, not the 15 percent in his original budget.

   The governor then introduced Roemer, who grasped the lectern and promptly took over the tour de force. He related how the former governors "got anxious over this past year about the priority given to higher education" and began trading ideas for a joint statement. "It was so much fun," he said.

    Not for Jindal, standing by and politely enduring Roemer's remarks, now rolling off that silver tongue. "Scrub, not slash," he admonished Jindal. "What we need is leadership."

   Roemer then introduced his colleagues, noting their singular contributions to higher ed, especially Foster's: "When Mike Foster talks about education, I listen." Hint.

   Foster acknowledged that spending cuts must come, but that the governors counseled "slowing down the train a bit."

   Lone Democrat Blanco was not as conciliatory. "You can't do more with less," she lectured, "You do less with less," warning against a "drive to mediocrity."

   This may have been a Buddy Roemer production, but Foster's presence made the foursome and also forced Jindal's hand. Their new relationship got off to a bad start at the inauguration when Jindal, with his former boss seated behind him, lamented "decades of failure in government" and "leaders who were unconcerned with the future."

   Now it was Jindal being taken to task by his elders for his stewardship of higher education, the state's future. In the end, though, Foster gave Jindal cover when he spoke up to say they were "all on the same page" backing Jindal's commitment to only cut higher ed by 10 percent.

   Actually, Jindal conceded nothing more than his recently expressed willingness to restore about $70 million to university budgets, amounting to a 10 percent reduction.

   Yet, the past governors' broader concerns seemed to be for Jindal's leadership. His idea for a long-term plan has been to badger university leaders to come up with one. After a week of that, Jindal should have put forward his own proposal. Instead, Speaker of the House Jim Tucker did, getting the Legislature to form a commission, including out-of-state experts, to report back next year on how to reorganize the university system.

   But back to the show. Roemer, relishing his gubernatorial moment, concluded by honoring the better half of his tag team.

   "I want to thank my son Chas," he said, recalling how the young man recently challenged him to "spend less time making money and to give something back."

   Jindal must have curdled inside, reminded that a few days earlier Chas Roemer, a member of the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, released a blistering statement that criticized the governor for supporting the alternative high school diploma legislation, which he said would give false hope to struggling students.

   Young Roemer charged that politics is keeping Jindal from tackling fundamental education problems that are holding the state back. "To take on issues that matter would mean to risk some political capital--something this administration seems unwilling to do," he said.

   Old governors will tell you that the chief executive who fails to demonstrate strong leadership on an issue will be challenged for it. A brash young Buddy Roemer thrived on calling out the political leadership of his day, a course the next generation seems destined to follow.

 Advertise on Bayoubuzz.  Be seen by a great audience
Louisiana Calendar  Post your own events.  Over 1000 visitors/day
Join BayoubuzzDance.com & input your own content

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter

For Email Marketing you can trust


Do you want to write for Bayoubuzz?  Email us.
See the "hot" topics on our discussion boards and chime in 

 





 












 

_____________________________________________
_________________Advertisement________________

______________________________________________



 


Bookmark  and or share this article with:
Delicious reddit Digg Facebook StumbleUpon



Comments from BayouBuzz readers

Roemers - what a joke. Grandpa was a crook. Dad was a naive joke of a governor. Son is a lightweight, whose credentials are hokey. Whether Jindal is good or bad, we don't need any more Roemer "leadership."
Written by   on 6/17/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Why is everybody picking on Nicholls?
Written by CN on 6/17/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


that it appears that Jindal just wants to be able to say that the state, under his governorship, cut taxes, for his own sake and is content to distance himself from the actual details since if he were to take ownership then his own political prospects might be damaged. The state's constitution mandates "pay as you go," ergo budget cuts become necessitated in that situation. The state's constitution also mandates that certain areas are protected, ergo "across the board" budget cutting means that budget cuts fall heavily on certain areas. This is why the governor needs to take charge and formulate a plan that assigns priorities. Regardless of however people may feel about former Gov. Blanco, she is absolutely right that if you have less resources to work with, you are not going to be able to "do more with less" but rather you have to settle for being able to do what you can with what you have. Strategic choices need to be made, if indeed this is going to be a long-term predicament, then, and rather than have each institution be having to be starving it's more important to focus on what needs to be done well and make sure that it is done well and that resources can go where they're needed. The state does not need to have each and every institution having to operate on a shoestring. It needs, instead, to have excellence in order to be able to compete with other states, but when has Jindal ever called for that? Some of us want what's best for state, whatever that may be, and for the state to succeed, whether or not that means that Jindal himself gets what he wants/succeeds. The legislature has actually acted, since Jindal did not, in calling for an independent commission to formulate where there are duplicate programs and so on.
Written by The Real Story is on 6/17/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Is Jindal the state's dictator? We have elected representatives who supposedly represent the "voice of the people." We can stand up and demand they override any of the governor's vetoes. If they cannot do this then we are at fault for electing wimpy representatives. Personally, I would prefer to see the public directly vote to decide such issues as our state's budget - but I am told I am foolish for desiring such a system. Okay ... so we have the representatives, governor and (corrupted buy big money) system we have. I think it sucks no matter which party is in control. Those of you who are happy when "your" party is in power - are empowering the other party when they are in power. I sincerely hope you're enjoying it.
Written by kpf on 6/16/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


if Jindal's agenda is to try to compel Southern Univ. and Grambling to become 2-year institutions then, given those institutions' historical status, he is guaranteed to have an all-out war on his hands. That's at all not to say that changes are not in order but rather to acknowledge the realities of the situation. Is he brilliant or is he a fool? First, he is probably eventually going to be making a lot of enemies in the LSU community as much as it looks like he's trying to wash his hands of the matter. Moreover, it's not that clear how much he supports the new hospital project as he seems to go hot and cold on that item. Then, he'll also be making enemies at every other college and university and then finally perhaps stirring what figures to be a really nasty hornets nest if he attempts to push such radical changes on the main campus of Southern and on Grambling as suggested. OTOH are such changes at Nicholls St., LSU-Eunice and Southern-New Orleans more doable and also promising in terms of providing for significant saving of costs? A good question. The main thing, however, is that it definitely seems as if he's looking to distance himself from these actions.
Written by The Real Story is on 6/16/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Before you flame away at me I do think Jindal should work with the state's universities and give them a little more time by keeping delaying the exemption portion of the Stelly repeal and also use the rainy day funds. In that I think he is being inflexible - probably for national attention. Nevertheless I do not think it is the governor's responsibility to determine which school becomes a 2 year school any more than he should identify a right of way for a state highway.
Written by kpf on 6/16/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


The style is identical to our president, who leaves the details to members of congress. I see nothing wrong with either Jindal or Obama (or any "leader" - political, business or military) laying out a broad plan and leaving the details to others. That does not disqualify someone from being a leader, unless micro-management is how you think a leader needs to be.
Written by kpf on 6/16/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


When the 4 ex-governors called for "leadership" from Jindal, did they really think that Jindal was going to use any of his political capital by publicly stating and publicly pressing for his actual agenda? Real leadership would be for Jindal to publicly state his goal. Have a press conference and say publicly that his goal is to convert the following 4 year universities to 2 year community colleges: Southern University-Baton Rouge, Southern University-New Orleans, Grambling, LSU-Eunice and Nicholls. Then, follow up on that press conference and twist the arms of the Legislators and Senators until then agree to it. However, that is not Jindal's methodology. He prefers to slash and burn with the budget and force the University Systems figure out how to operate without any money. That way, he hopes to have the University Systems "choose" to convert those 4 year Universities to the 2 year community colleges. By doing it this way, he can get what he wants, but he is not the "bad guy" who is responsible for it. He can claim that the Universities "chose" to downgrade those Universities. Folks, it is not rocket science to figure out Jindal methodology. The only rocket science is figuring out whether Jindal is a genius or a fool. On that issue, the verdict is not in yet....
Written by The Anti-Education Governor on 6/16/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I think it is humorous that the 3 Governors called on Jindal to provide leadership. Not any one of them provided the leadership to get thsi State on a better path. They were all just more of the same "good ole boy" politics. Roemer did not provide leadership because Edwards was still calling the shots and Roemer could not over come that. Where was the leadership? Foster was a tax and spend governor in republican (sheeps) clothing. And what can you say about Blanco? the only leadership any of them provided was to allow the Legislature to raise taxes and spending. At least Jindal in trying to trying to reign in some of the taxoing, although he will not have a lot of success, and he was forced into this by his name being mentioned on the national scene.
Written by   on 6/16/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Check out the stats. If this state achieves mediocrity, it will be an UPHILL drive to get there. Roemer is not in office, he has as much effect on what our governor does as George Bush (either one) has on what Obama does. Let me spell that out for you: Z-I-L-C-H. What's next, will Jimmy Carter chime in with his opinion?
Written by next on 6/16/2009
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE






Related Articles

Louisiana Politics: Vitter, Melancon, Landrieu, Budget, , Cao, Drink Ban, Tea Party

Louisiana Congr. Cao Last Stand On Health Care Vote?

Jefferson Parish Louisiana Scandals Hit Judge Race

Gov Jindal Takes on the Real Louisiana Government

Two Announced Candidates For Louisiana 3rd Congressional District

Also by this Author


Gov Jindal Takes on the Real Louisiana Government

Who Dat Say Dey Gonna Raise Dem Louisiana Motor Vehicle Fees?

Drawing Lines Before Counting Voters For Louisiana Reapportionment

Louisiana Gov. Jindal Needs a Game Plan for Higher Education

Louisiana Road Woes Remain After Highway Boss Goes





Sitemap
Advertise Buzzback Calendar About
Business Politics State National Sci/Tech Entertainment Sports World
© 2006-2007 BAYOUBUZZ.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



006 BAYOUBUZZ.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED