Only search Bayoubuzz
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter
Privacy assured
For Email Marketing you can trust


Article Written on: Friday-December-12-2008 BuzzBoards Calendar Contact Advertise About
Front Page Politics State National Business Technology Sports Entertainment



Al Gore, New Orleans Snow, Obama and Global Cooling


Written by: Jeff Crouere


Buzz Right Back----E-Mail a Friend----Print Page


For years, Al Gore and other environmental extremists have sounded the alarm about the global climate crisis. I agree especially after yesterday’s freakish snowfall in New Orleans. It is high time for all clear minded scientists to unite behind a plan to combat global cooling.  

 

It should be clear to everyone now that global cooling is a real problem. In fact, the cooling of the earth’s temperature is a real crisis that demands action. Yesterday, the metropolitan New Orleans area received the earliest snowfall in recorded history. Some suburban areas north of New Orleans received 8 inches of snow! This is history making and disturbing, so why is global cooling impacting New Orleans?

 

Sadly, that question is being ignored by Al Gore, who continues to pursue the myth that humans are causing the temperature of the earth to increase. He believes in global warming as a religion and it is scary sight to behold. Gore is also pushing the use of carbon credits, which are designed to supposedly limit the “carbon footprint” of individuals and businesses. Hollywood is completely on board with Gore’s radical global warming agenda and continues to produce movies which warn of the climate crisis. Today, a new movie called “The Day the Earth Stood Still,” will be released starring Keanu Reeves as an alien visiting earth warning people that they are damaging the planet. One reviewer called the movie’s ecological emphasis “preachy.”

 

Gore should visit New Orleans to investigate what is really happening. Yesterday the rare snowfall was an amazing sight that kids of all ages enjoyed. Unfortunately, for those who lost power or had to deal with dangerous road conditions, it was a much more uncomfortable situation.

 

Barack Obama is fully supportive of the Gore agenda and agrees with the global warming hysterics. He has committed to make the fight against global warming a signature issue in his upcoming administration. It seems like the President-Elect might have identified the wrong problem.

 

According to noted geologist and famed hurricane forecaster William Gray, the temperature of the earth will cool over the next ten years. In addition, a recent report by the University of Illinois and the NASA Marshall Flight Center showed that artic ice levels have actually increased 30% in the past year.

 

New Orleans is not the only place in the United States to face unseasonably cold weather this year. In fact, Alaska is dealing with the coldest start to their winter season in 16 years.

 

In another sign that the global warming “crisis” is nothing more than a hoax, a new U.S. Senate report includes statements from 650 international scientists who dispute the claims about man-made global warming. The report maintains that the sun is the actual cause of about half of the earth’s climate change.  More and more scientists are predicting that in the next ten years, the naturally occurring solar cycles will cause cooling conditions on earth. Dealing with global cooling, which may last longer than the normal solar cycle of 11 years should become a top priority for governments around the world.

 

Instead, Al Gore, Barack Obama, the United Nations and Hollywood are pointing to global warming as the crisis of the century. They should refrain from hysterical rhetoric and try to focus on what is really happening in places like New Orleans. In the Crescent City, snow is not seen very often, it has appeared only eight times since 1947. It was a rare event to say the least, almost as rare as Al Gore and his global warming fanatics actually making sense.

 



Jeff Crouere is the Host of “Ringside Politics,” which airs at 7:30 p.m. Fri. and 10:00 p.m. Sun. on WLAE-TV 32, a PBS station, and 7 till 11 a.m. weekdays on WGSO 990 AM in New Orleans and the Northshore. He is the Political Analyst for WGNO-TV ABC26 and the Political Editor for NewOrleans.com. For more information, visit his web site at RingsidePolitics.com. E-mail him at jeff@ringsidepolitics.com


 Advertise on Bayoubuzz.  Be seen by a great audience
Louisiana Calendar  Post your own events.  Over 1000 visitors/day
Join BayoubuzzDance.com & input your own content
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter
For Email Marketing you can trust

Do you want to write for Bayoubuzz?  Email us.
See the "hot" topics on our discussion boards and chime in 



 












 

_____________________________________________
_________________Advertisement________________

______________________________________________



 


Bookmark  and or share this article with:
Delicious reddit Digg Facebook StumbleUpon



Comments from BayouBuzz readers

Simone, what did you just say about Al?
Written by   on 12/20/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Yeah, Jeff, don't you know that it's written the Gore Testament that any weather event is proof of global warming? Severe cold, severe heat, severe moderation, drought, floods, snowstorms, hail, daylight, dark.. Nobel Al has issued parables decreeing that all of these are indicators of our doom.
Written by   on 12/16/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Jeff you can be counted on for the most ignorant wanna be journalist writings I have ever seen. You think because it snowed in New Orleans that discredits Global Warming. What an Idiot. You are typical Louisiana Hick mentality trying to carry the GOP torch. You certainly fit the mold. You have really outdone yourself with this one. Do you even read? Al
Written by Al on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


My point is; you WERE forced to shop at Walmarts, you just didn't realize it... Right down to the red light they install on every street in FRONT of EVERY Walmart.. Much in the same way you are FORCED to subsidize every Saints football ticket sold... Whether you like football or not....
Written by   on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


My point is "nobody FORCES us to shop at Wal Mart." Whatever "favored" status they have, it is still consumers who keep them in business. It will all work out though (yeah, like a house of cards falling) as the bailouts, universal health care, rebuild the country's infrastructure, provide 500 millinium protection levees, etc., etc. will be paid for .... oh... somehow or another. No problem.
Written by kpf on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


You see KPF, it is a big club out there....
Written by   on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


And of course I had alluded to Pan Am in another post... Did you know that Pan Am was started by General 'Hap' Arnold? And when Howard Hughes built up TWA congress did what it could to hinder Mr. Hughes.... He was a very interesting person... Loved airplanes.... and wide open spaces....
Written by   on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


In fact, if Walmart was going under, it would get a bailout also.... Did you know that there are more people in walmart uniforms than there are men and women in the U.S. armed services uniform?
Written by   on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Wal Mart was all about government control KPF...... It was the fastest outlet for most favored foreign nation trading status goods (China) or did you fail to see President Bush (the first) awarding Sam Walton his medal of marketing excellence or something or other like that? (It is known as Presidential Medal of Freedom citation).....
Written by   on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I do not think of my beliefs as "middle of the road" rather, I suspect (no.... my feeling is stronger than mere "suspicion") that rather than the ideal of market manipulation to benefit the "little people" what we all too often (“always”, perhaps?) have is market manipulation to benefit the tycoons, big campaign contributors, etc. at the expense of the little man. I truly do not understand why "people" ("us" in other words) cannot be trusted when we hold the position of CEO of some company but (somehow) our motives become pure when we are elected to a government position. The premise seems to be that executives in a capitalist enterprise are corrupted but when these ambitious individuals become an elected official their motives are beyond question. Considering what one reads in the paper or sees on the news - every single day - about how our elected officials are corrupt, I truly question why anyone would come to this conclusion. "Market forces" are an indication of "what people want" (high prices and "excessive" profits merely illustrate a need that is not being adequately filled, as but one example) not “evil manipulation” (unless these high prices are caused by tariffs or subsidies, that is). Market forces - caused by consumer choice - are "pure" in that it reflects what people are willing to do with their hard earned money. I think this far superior to government deciding who the winners and losers are in the market place contrary to the will of the people as it is expressed in how they are willing to spend their earnings. Bailouts, tariffs and subsidies are merely efforts by government to control the market, and will always fail in the long run, IMHO.
Written by kpf on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


There are no solutions, there are only coping measures and adaptations to be pursued.... I read somewhere in the late 60's that the last trace of unpolluted air on the globe had dissappeared somewhere around the 1840's... Virginia City, Nevada was booming around that time.... You should go there sometime and enjoy the views....
Written by   on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Funny.... I thought I said that even if Global Warming is real that the proposed solutions could be a scam - if fact I also provided a link to the New York Times which agrees that many of the solutions to Global Warming are not going to help matters, only put money in some people's pockets in the guise of a solution (that sure sounds like a scam to me). As far as economics goes, it's kind of like your reference to gravity - with a big exception - there are those who think they can manipulate economics in a way they would not think they could do with gravity. Unfortunately, economics - as this dumb person understands it - is "controlled" by consumer choice - not dictates from "on high." That is why the black market was so strong in the U.S.S.R. - or for that matter the illegal drug market thrives in our country. People choose what they want to spend their money on, that makes businesses succeed or fail - not bailouts - consumer choice. We could bail out Mom and Pop stores for decades, but that won't make anyone choose to shop there instead of Wal-Mart. It's not about fairness, or jobs, it's about consumer choice - one either gets that or they don't.
Written by kpf on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


If dub goes away again, how will I work on my PhTee in arrogantelitism?
Written by   on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


'Dr. TW's expertise on the subject?' Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!!!!!! What on earth do buffalo farts or mitochondria have to do with global warming or expertise????
Written by   on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Here we go again, if you disagree with a liberal you're stupid and you're classified as radioactive. Where is the legitimate debate? Just because you say it's true doesn't make it true. Just because the AP reports that it's true doesn't make it true. Only one side of the global warming theory has been presented and the press and Al Gore say it's true. Sorry but I don't trust politicians and I certainly do not believe everything reported on TV (even FOX News!) Take some time and read the opposing views, you may be surprised.
Written by Sid on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


kpf, when you said, "Mr. Quidd - being a liberal Democrat - simply does not understand economics."... that was dumb. And, when you said, "Global Warming..It's a scam, it needs to be exposed and stopped."...that was really dumb... and, When you refuted Dr.TW's expertise on the subject-- that was even dumber... And, when you pair up with the liking of "Written by" and "Sid"... that's dumber than dumb.... KP, you were my "middle of the road" hero on the Buzzy boards... What happened to your political savvy?... denying Global Warming?...tsk tsk.. (can't wrap my brain around that one)
Written by KjunLady on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Sorry TW, I guess Fox News lied to me again or maybe Rush, Hannity, and others lied as well. Listen Doc, explain to me the scientific "facts" back when global cooling was predicted. The fact of the matter is that this issue has not been debated in a scientific venue but only in the press. The only debate I saw was Newt Gingrich vs. Gore, what a scientific mutual groping that was. There are alot of legitimate climatolgists out there that disagree with Al Gore, the self appointed Savior from Global Warming. Yes, since the industrial revolution green house gases have gone up and we need to be good stewards of our environment and continue to minimize the pollution. But when temperature recording stations were placed near concrete parking lots, etc. and only one side of the argument is given,I am skeptical when Al Gore says the Polar Bear needs a shave because he's hot. Believing Al Gore is about as bad as believing everything Hannity, O'Rielly, and Rush spew out of their mouths.
Written by Sid on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I don't understand why the Earth in the Balance cultists aren't celebrating the demise of the Big Three. They are pursuing the demise and the direct and indirect job losses of Big Oil, Big Coal, Big Guns, Big Gold, Big Lumber, Big Fur, Big Agriculture, Big Seafood, Big Nukes, and everything else that's big except government. Their policies lead to global depression, but wouldn't a global depression help to promote their policies. Won't an economic ice age thwart the greedy capitalists and reduce global warming? Cuddle me in your bosom, Oh Great Gaea.
Written by   on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


You have to understand, kpf, that anyone who opposes liberals "lacks intellect", "drinks the kool-aid", "is a racist", or "an ungrateful white person who was given an leg up on the downtrodden", or is any one of dozens more personifications of evil, ignorance, bias and greed. There is no such thing as a stupid, lazy, bigoted, ignorant, selfish, mantra-reciting liberal. They are all enlightened, intellectual, open-minded, generous, and filled with the spirit of the cosmos. A remarkably few liberals might actually be ignorant, but that is only because conservatives refused to educate them. But like the trees that they hug, they still have an innate goodness and light that evil conservatives shall never understand. All praise to gaea, Gore and Obama.
Written by   on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


No I am not a "ditto head" for anyone, neither Rush Limbaugh nor Al Gore. I do not lock step behind either party's agenda, rather I come to my own conclusions about issues. I am certain that I am wrong at times, so I try to keep an open mind. Why is it, my Dear, when you believe something, that those who disagree with you are simply "drinking the Kool-Aid." Could you not be accused of the same? Is it not wise to question statements made by those in power? Is this not doubly so when those who make these pronouncements are positioning themselves to profit? I suppose if I must be grouped into a political catagory I could be called a social liberal and fiscal conservative. However, I am far more socially liberal than the majority of the Democratic Party and also far more "Free Market" (I guess to liberals that's "Conservative" and/or "Republican" - I disagree) than 99% of the Republicans in D.C.
Written by kpf on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Dear kp, Yes or No-- Are you a ditto-head?
Written by KjunLady on 12/15/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


TeeDub - what happened to that month off? The essential problem is that these "climate models" are not statistically relevent and have proven nothing except maybe it's been hotter the last ten years. In terms of proving relevance, coefficient (contribution) of variables, degree of colinearity, etc. etc. these "climate modelers" haven't even shown that CO2 is a cause and not just an innocent by-stander to other hugely overriding factors - such as that big furnance in the sky. I think the climate hysteria crowd should act on their convictions and volunteer for the perfect CO2 mitigation - die.
Written by steveo on 12/14/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Science and fact have nothing to do with scams. Let's assume that Global warming is real, that does not mean that the solutions that I have heard of are the correct actions to take. Kyoto would restrict our country while allowing India and China to increase their "carbon footprint" (which they are doing as each country is building hundreds of coal burning power plants). The carbon offset is a scam whereby insiders (Gore, the usual suspects of big ampaign contributors, etc.) will profit by having government take money from the private sector to basically do nothing to either reduce emmissions or help our economy, simply to enrich themselves in the name of helping the environment - which is not the same as helping the environment. It's a scam, it needs to be exposed and stopped. Here's a few links - one from the NY Times - not a "low IQ conservative rag":________http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/05/business/05online.html?_r=1__________ http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/06/04/gore-invests-carbon-credit-company-will-media-care
Written by kpf on 12/14/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


" NOT ALL VIEWPOINTS ARE EQUALLY VALID. YOURS IS WRONG. TW"....<giggle>... Geesus H Crisse-- three people who don't believe in Global Warming?-- and they're all radical Conservatives on this blog..... I'm a Conservative too-- a Conservative Democrat-- but, my politics have nothing to do with Science. (Kp-- you gotta seperate yaself from this threesome)
Written by KjunLady on 12/14/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Sid, what is remotely intelligent about your post? You belittle Al Gore and then say liberals like to call people names rather than debate issues. You don't think that's a bit hypocritical? Then you proclaim that climatic cycles change. This is so painfully obvious that it makes my head hurt, yet you act as if you've discovered some rare truth. Of course climatic cycles change, with multiple periodicities. That is not the point, the point is that superimposed upon global climatic cycles, since the onset of the Industrial Revolution, there has been a newly documented, and for the last 650,000 years previously unseen, increase in CO2 for which we humans are responsible. It is not part of the regular cycles, guys - we have a much greater handle on this issue than we did, say 40 years ago - we have TONS more data that didn't exist before. The bottom line is that we are altering the climate with greenhouse gases - there is no real debate on this point anymore, just like there's no real debate on whether the Earth is flat or about evolution. Not every issue has two sides - NOT ALL VIEWPOINTS ARE EQUALLY VALID. YOURS IS WRONG. TW
Written by Tee Dub on 12/14/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


The fact of the matter is that there has not been legitimate debate on the global warming issue. Politicians and those Hollywood "jump on the wagon types" are all over the global warming issue and are proclaiming it as truth. Years ago the enviroonmentalists were on the global cooling issue, we were all going to freeze! The earth's climate cycles over time and that is proven. Regardless of this one sided battle, we need to take care of our environment. Global warming is fact according to Al Gore, LOL, what the hell does he know about anything remotely scientific. But he said it and heck, we need another fad to jump on so to hell with those that refute this declaration and let's call them cave men and stupid. The libs would rather call you names than intelligently debate the issue.
Written by Sid on 12/14/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


The "Teabag" thing is funny, but the rest of your post proves the point I made earlier, and the Bill Jefferson bit is _completely_ irrelevant to the issue at hand. TW
Written by Tee Dub on 12/14/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I can find one "PhD scientist who knows a thing or two about paleoclimatology" who believes that lack of intellect is the reason for global warming skepticism, but that lack of intellect has nothing to do with William Jefferson's voter base. I have enough intellect to know he's a kook. Teabag, What a pompous ass to inform us of the length of your absence here. Seemed like only minutes to me.
Written by   on 12/14/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I suspect the percentage of scientists who disbelieve in global warming is not equal to the percentage of scientists who disbelieve in gravity. We'll draw our own conclusions on this. Many scientists take no positive position on this saying that science is not yet certain about how or if mankind is changing the climate. There are even many who say we should "do something" to keep mankind from making things worse, even though there is no certaity mankind is in fact changing the climate, but rather, we should change our ways to be on the safe side despite the uncertainty on this matter. Then.... there are those..... who are ABOLUTELY CERTAIN that mankind is changing the climate. Despite many scientists who disagree, they are CERTAIN. As certain as they are about the existance of gravity. Really.... "that certain." No doubt, none, zero percent possibility of error. Zero point zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero percent chance of being wrong. Interesting.
Written by kpf on 12/13/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


kp- I don't guess you believe in gravity either.
Written by KjunLady on 12/13/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Global warming changes weather patterns Jeff. Just keep your head in the sand as you usually do.
Written by David Quidd on 12/13/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


There you go tossing your 'credentials' around like they mean something Tee Dub... You probably wouldn't even know the advantages of manual steering over power steering on a 945 H.P. beast if it slapped you up side the head while walking the dog down the quarter mile stretch..... But anyways, the snow in New Orleans is a fluctuation..... The earth, much like women, is subject to its own perogatives and whims... It has nothing to do with 'Paleoclimatology', and everything to do with thermodynamics... And what you are looking at is a thermocouple in action... Watch how motherf@^*ing hot it gets in the Beg Easy next August....
Written by   on 12/13/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


No, the dissenting voices are not hillbillies, they're scientists. So the issue obviously does warrant debate. The U.N. would love to use this as an excuse to move money from more prosperous nations to less prosperous ones (a United Nations "bailout" in other words). There are big campaign contributors lining up to get taxpayer money to ... basically "do" not a damn thing... in the name of "saving the planet." The fact of the matter is there are entities that will profit (not "free market profits" - rather "government granted profit") by this issue being perceived as "a done deal, not to be debated." I will allow that GLOBAL WARMING MAY INDEED BE REAL - that STILL doesn't mean I automatically trust in our government officials to "do the right thing" in fixing this problem (in fact, with their track record, I seriously doubt they COULD even if they actually WANTED to). What other things have our "rulers" in various times and locations decreed are "beyond questioning"? Let's see, the infallibility of the Pope; black people are only 2/3rds of a person; the Jews are subhuman....hmmmmm.... sorry.... just because Al Gore and his friends along with the U.N. are positioned to profit from "fixing the problem" does not warrant my silence on this matter.
Written by kpf on 12/13/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


" are willing to trust our government official and their big campaign contributors".. No, kp. This is way bigger than any government. Not talking about ethanol... Not talking about crooked politicians... Talking about Global Warming, it's effects- and, how so many more are "realizing now" what scientists have been trying to tell us for a long long time... (It took a big mouth politician with a lot of money to actually spread the word, the WARNINGS.) Global Warming is not up for debate. It's a fact. It's here.. And it's getting worse... But, we can do something about it, kpf--don't discourage that.
Written by KjunLady on 12/13/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


oops, that's "very" not "vey" and that's "cr@p" not "rap"
Written by kpf on 12/13/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


It matters not whether there is global warming - IF the solution is nothing but a scam to make influential wealthy people even wealthier. Any "solution" to a problem - real or imagined - is subject to being a scam. Such as.... "charitable" organizations that eat up 90 plus percent of their donations by having extravagant salaries and perks and doing vey little for those they claim their organization exists to help. Gullible is believing that any idea that claims to be environmentally helpful will be - when in fact it may be nothing more than a scam and political payoff. This is exactly what ethanol subsidies are, something that would not turn a profit (let me explain EXACTLY what that means ---- NOBODY WOULD FREELY BUY THAT RAP...okay...understand?) in the private sector but exists solely due to government decree. It exists DESPITE actually causing MORE pollution than if it did not; it also causes fuel to be higher with all of the negative consequences high fuel causes our economy. However there are those of you out there who – despite all the news on just how crooked our politicians are and despite the evidence of government dictated scams like ethanol that actually make both prices and pollution worse – are willing to trust our government official and their big campaign contributors (the people who – PURELY COINIDENTALLY OF COURSE – will also own the companies that will save the environment thru carbon credits or some other NONSENSE) with solving the problem.
Written by kpf on 12/13/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


"Gore should visit New Orleans to investigate what is really happening"... Jeff, what should Al Gore do when he gets here?- Measure the Bonnet Carre Spillway?.. Drop a rock from the Hi-Rise?... Are you challenging Pulitzer Prize winning recipient, Al Gore? Yes, it snowed like a "mutha".. (And, ya know what? Last time it snowed in N.O. on Christmas Day, Hurricane Katrina hit us the following summer... must be something to that too- eh?)...Global Cooling?...uh- yeah!.. and Global Warming--Check!.... the climates are SHIFTING, changing... Do you FINALLY GET IT, JEFF? Do you finally get it?..........( good letter, TW- "the first one"- even before the credentials... and, KPF- I'm surprised at you!... Usually smart things come out of your mouth <w> )
Written by KjunLady on 12/13/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


 
Written by   on 12/13/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


No, I'm not gullible, I'm just a PhD scientist who knows a thing or two about paleoclimatology. I know all about the earth's long-term climatic cycles, and I have regular contact with people who know even more than I do. Let me tell you what "gullible" is - "gullible" is a good word for all the unsophisticated, uneducated people in this country who think that their opinions are valuable because we in America have this proud anti-intellectual tradition, and so we (erroneously) tend to listen to the worthless opinions of everyday schmucks - you know, the kind of people who think an idiot like Sarah Palin should be a step away from the presidency. We have millions of opinions about virtually everything in this country, but the uninformed ones are a dime a dozen. And a lot of you are going to hate this post, because in America, it's not "cool" to be an intellectual snob. We are okay with the notion that some people are more athletic than others (I'll never play professional football, no matter how much I'd like to), but differences in intellect? Those can't exist! TW
Written by Tee Dub on 12/12/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Excellent article based on good old common sense. As for Tee Dub this is a typical response from a naive and gullible person. So sad that a vast number of people can be so easily conned. If you are interested in learning something Tee Dub check out the time lag between global warming and carbon dioxide and find out which comes first. Learn about how little CO2 is actually in the atmosphere, how much the oceans produce and discover that plants need this greenhouse gas to survive. Learn how experts have been studying solar activity for hundreds of years and how accurate they can forecast the weather by this method. They have predicted global cooling and they are spot on. If you think that there is man-made global warming try to win the $500,000 on offer to anyone proving just that. No-one else can. One day the penny will drop and you will be ashamed that you were so gullible.
Written by Keith F on 12/12/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Kerry, sorry, Bud, but you are wrong about this, as are the 650 scientists the Republicans cite. I could probably find 650 scientists around the world who believe in fairies, for chrissakes. Here's the thing - atmospheric CO2 levels are higher than they've been in over 650 thousand years! Now what on earth could be responsible for placing that much carbon into the atmosphere? Since we haven't seen an increase in volcanism, I think we all know what the answer is. Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/may/13/carbonemissions.climatechange
Written by Tee Dub on 12/12/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


650 scientists vs. cretin Al Gore - no contest. This is an issue that needs more debate - keep this in the fore front Jeff, please. What a scam. http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=37283205-c4eb-4523-b1d3-c6e8faf14e84
Written by kpf on 12/12/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


On the one hand, we have decades of climate research, hundreds of thousands of years of climatic data recorded in deep sea cores and ice cores, atmospheric carbon dioxide levels at not just historic, but historic+prehistoric highs... BUT on the other hand, it snowed in New Orleans yesterday. Well let's throw all those data away, then! Jeff, it is irresponsible, and even reprehensible, of you to prattle on about topics on which you are so woefully uninformed, but then again, if you didn't do that, then you'd never write anything, would you? At least the anti-intellectual conservatives got their *sses handed to them last month, so there's hope yet. I think I'll take another month off from visiting this site. It gets my blood pressure up too much to read this tripe. TW
Written by Tee Dub on 12/12/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE






Related Articles

Organization Says Politics Wins In FDA Oyster Ban Delay

Louisiana Sen. Landrieu Vows To Fight FDA Raw Oyster Ban

Rush Limbaugh, St. Louis Football Buy Ramming Into National Debate

Nobel Peace Prize Love Obama, Democrats

Republicans, Democrats Spar Over Obama Nobel Peace Prize

Also by this Author


Louisiana Legislature: A Nanny Government?

Louisiana Congr. Cao Last Stand On Health Care Vote?

Pelosi, Obama and Health Care Bill: Sickening US Politics

Jindal Ok Fees Hike For Louisiana While Saying No To Taxes

Louisiana Legislature And The Fashion Police





Sitemap
Advertise Buzzback Calendar About
Business Politics State National Sci/Tech Entertainment Sports World
© 2006-2007 BAYOUBUZZ.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



006 BAYOUBUZZ.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED