s Louisiana Senator Landrieu Criticizes President Bush's Budget
Only search Bayoubuzz
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter
Privacy assured
For Email Marketing you can trust


Article Written on: Monday-February-4-2008 BuzzBoards Calendar Contact Advertise About
Front Page Politics State National Business Technology Sports Entertainment



Louisiana Senator Landrieu Criticizes President Bush's Budget


Written by: BayouBuzz Staff


Buzz Right Back----E-Mail a Friend----Print Page


 

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Mary L. Landrieu, D-La., today released the following statement in response to the Fiscal Year 2009 Federal Budget proposal submitted to Congress by the President.

Sen. Landrieu said:

“In his 2009 budget, President Bush finally makes an attempt at new-found fiscal responsibility by cutting 151 domestic programs and not accounting for most of his Iraq war funding. Despite these cuts, our deficit would still rise to $410 billion in the next year if Congress were to accept his misprioritized proposals.

“The President does rightly recognize the Gulf Coast’s 100-year flood protection requirements by requesting $5.8 billion in funding. However, his demand that Louisiana localities bear the remaining $1.5 billion places an onerous burden on the state budget that has billions in unmet infrastructure needs and a decimated tax base to rely on.   

“Among the proposal’s unrealistic cuts, the President slashes funding for local law enforcement by 61 percent, totally eliminating the Byrne Justice grant programs and several COPS programs that have been essential to fighting the crime surge in Southeast Louisiana.

“As America has become more vulnerable to terrorist threats, the President cuts critical funding for emergency preparedness, response, mitigation and recovery. For example, the proposal cuts port security grants by 48 percent, severely threatening our ports response capability, and reduces firefighter grants by 60 percent. Strikingly, he cuts the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) budget by 31 percent despite the critical need to reform and resource the agency in the wake of its ill-equipped response to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

“In hearings last year, United States Marine Corps leaders testified that a force structure containing less than 10 LPD-class ships would put the Marines at ‘significant risk’ in meeting commitments for global presence and countering terrorist threats. Despite that warning, the President’s budget request only provides $103.2 million for the program next year, stopping it at just nine LPD-17 ships. The termination of this LPD-17 program, short of its needed target, can and must be reversed. Failure to continue production of these ships will not only weaken our force structure, it could also cause the loss of thousands of highly skilled Louisiana manufacturing jobs in an already suffering United States manufacturing sector.

“The President also targets our farmers by slashing the Agriculture Department’s budget by $1.1 billion, in part by eliminating the Commodity Supplemental Food Program that assists the elderly.

“Despite never fully funding No Child Left Behind, undermining the bipartisan law that I took part in crafting, the President now freezes education spending in the year Congress must reauthorize the law. The cumulative shortfall of the law is $85.6 billion since its 2002 enactment.

“The most vulnerable in our society – the poor and the elderly – are also targeted with cuts to Medicaid of $17 billion and Medicare by $178 billion over the next five years.  

“Three years ago, I described the President’s Fiscal Year 2006 proposal as leading Louisiana and America down a “Path to a Debt Society.” Working families across our state and nation have already felt the pain of that journey, and this proposal simply steers them down its steepest slope. As a Senate appropriator, I will work with my colleagues to ensure Congress enacts a responsible and honest budget – one that gives Louisiana the resources it needs for continued recovery and the American people the tools to meet the challenges ahead.” 

Earlier today, President Bush commented on his budget by issuing this statement:

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you all for coming. I just met with my Cabinet, where we discussed a lot of issues. And one issue we discussed is the budget. I submitted the budget today to Congress -- it's on a laptop notebook, an e-budget. It saves paper, saves trees, saves money. I think it's the first budget submitted electronically.

And it's a good budget. It's a budget that achieves some important objectives. One, it understands our top priority is to defend our country, so we fund our military, as well as fund the homeland security.

Secondly, the budget keeps our economy growing. It's central that we make sure that we deal with the uncertainties -- the economic uncertainties we face. And that's why we're working hard with the House and the Senate to get a growth package out quickly that will put money in the hands of consumers and provide incentives to small businesses and large businesses to invest.

Thirdly, we recognize that in order for this economy to grow, it's important to make the tax relief permanent. And that's what this budget reflects. It's a budget that boosts money for education and health and housing. It helps deal with the issue of making the tax code more fair for individuals who want to buy health insurance in the individual market.

This budget is one that keeps spending under control; discretionary spending is held to less than 1 percent. It eliminates 151 wasteful or bloated programs, saving the taxpayers $18 billion. It also takes a hard look at entitlement growth over the next five years, and provides specific recommendations to save $208 billion over those five years. At the same time, the budget achieves balance by 2012.

This is a good, solid budget. It's not only an innovative budget, in that it's coming to Congress over the Internet, it's a budget that's balanced -- gets to balance in 2012 and saves taxpayers money.

You know, in my State of the Union I said to the Congress that there's a lot of talk about entitlement spending. Once again, we've proposed specific reforms and specific measures. And Congress needs to come up with its own ideas. And Congress needs to respond to these looming deficits as a result of unfunded liabilities inherent in Social Security and Medicare. Our budget does that. Our budget protects America and it encourages economic growth. Congress needs to pass it.

Budget of 2009






 

_____________________________________________
_________________Advertisement________________

______________________________________________



 


Bookmark  and or share this article with:
Delicious reddit Digg Facebook StumbleUpon



Comments from BayouBuzz readers

It will be a good day in Louisiana, and perhaps even for folks around the United States when the 'Bug-Eyed' wonder simply fades away...............
Written by pftpftpftpftpftpftpftpftpftpftpftpftpftpftpftpftpf on 2/7/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Thomas Sowell definition of economics: "Economics is the study of the use of scarce resources which have alternative uses." "Alternative uses" - what else COULD have been done with this money? There most certainly is more unnecessary wasteful spending by our government besides defense, Medicade & Medicare. One only needs to spend some time watching C-Span (don't rely on the media to tell you what is going on, look at it yourself) to see things like: the VA saying they do not need additional hospital beds in Florida, they need them elsewhere - nevertheless congress provides the VA comittee chairman's district in Florida additional beds - or I’ve seen Air Force generals saying they do not want any more A-7 aircraft, that in fact they will phase them out of front line service, only to see congress continue to keep the Texas Armed Services chairman's A-7 production facility in his district continuing to churn out more planes the military does not want. Money used for these unnecessary expenditures is money that is UNAVAILABLE for other uses. Unfortunately far too many in both parties simply do not understand this or they simply do not care. Best not to let it drive your blood pressure up - this will only shorten your life. I recommend moderate alcohol indulgence along with some good ol' south Louisiana Zydeco or Cajun dancing. Laissez les bons temps rouler!
Written by kerry fox on 2/7/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Bush has given conservatives a bad name by running the deficit to it's present amounts, but our wonderful Congress is equally to blame for this problem. Bush should have played hard ball and vetoed some of this crap...but until we get a fiscal conservative with balls we're screwed. Miss Mary has to go, she is part of the problem.
Written by Sid on 2/6/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Karma? Oh hell, I've no hope then. ;-)
Written by kerry fox on 2/6/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Here Sid, this from Paul Krugman on federal budgets under Bush: "Consider the actual record of spending. Never mind dollar figures, which grow because of inflation, population growth, and other normal factors. A better guide is spending as a percentage of GDP. And this has increased, from 18.5% in fiscal 2001 to 20% in fiscal 2007. But where did that increase come from? Three words: defense, Medicare, Medicaid. That’s the whole story. Defense up from 3 to 4% of GDP; Medicare and Medicaid up from 3.4% to 4.6%, partially offset by increased payments for Part B and stuff. Aside from that, there’s been no major movement. Behind these increases are the obvious things: the war McCain wants to fight for the next century, the general issue of excess cost growth in health care, and the prescription drug benefit. So the next time Mr. McCain or anyone else promises to rein in runaway spending, they should be asked which of these things they intend to reverse. Are they talking about pulling out of Iraq? Denying seniors the latest medical treatments? Canceling the drug benefit? If not, what are they talking about?" Like I said, the devil's in the details. And on an unrelated topic - kerry, sure, I absolutely think there's a tendency for Zulu to concentrate on giving throws to black people, but I've seen a lot of the other krewes ignore blacks - sometimes it's embarrassingly obvious. At Zulu last year I got a coconut, though - I had caught a stuffed animal, and even though I was holding my 3-yr old son, I decided to give it to a little African-American kid who was sitting below me (it was probably intended for him, anyway). Well, a rider saw me do that, and motioned me to come up to the float, which I did. He handed me a coconut - me, a 40-something white guy (about the last type of person to get throws from ANY krewe). So karma helps in the quest for the coconut, people. TW
Written by Tee Dub on 2/6/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Since our politicians in D.C. do not recognize the limits the Constitution places on them I am always happy to see a divided government (at least with the minority party having 40+ seats in the Senate). Now if the Democrats get control of both houses and the presidency - with 60+ Senators - you'll see what gazillions in spending will look like. The scary thing about Democrats is that any spending once enacted is - to them - set in stone - google the "Federal Helium Reserve", our strategic reserve for part of our "force structure" - namely our fleet of dirigibles (what a pathetic joke our government is; "Mohair Subsidies" is another example). So I'm sure "Mary" does not even consider any cuts in government spending or "streamlining" any government agencies' workforce or any other break for tax payers. Why should she? Tax payers are not the people who elected her. In fairness, our Republican representatives are just as protective of useless waste in their own districts. It's hopeless, just open up your wallet and quit ur-bitchin'.
Written by kerry fox on 2/6/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Okay, we have spent gazillions on a war that some people agree with and some don't...what does that have to do with Miss Landrieu not offering any alternate cuts? Or does she think that the gazillions should be added to the budget and given away?
Written by Sid on 2/6/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


One other thing Tee Dub, I caught Zulu last year (yesterday we hung out on Frenchman St). So anyways, could you tell your brothers in da Zulu pea-raid to trow some-a-dem coconuts to a white boy every once in a while? Sheesh, don't tell me there's no such a thing as black people who discriminate, huh (!) I know betta, me yeah.
Written by kerry fox on 2/6/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Yep, it is BILLIONS. What an idiot I am sometimes. TW
Written by Tee Dub on 2/6/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


I hear what you're saying Tee Dub, but I believe that's "billions." Of course - if I were in charge - going to war in oil producing countries would be a profitable enterprise. We'd just take enough of their oil revenue to a) provide for the widows and orphans of our troops, b) provide a tax cut to taxpaying Americans, c) do other wonderful stuff with this windfall. So - if it were run right - war doesn't necessarily have to be a money-losing enterprise; just make war against wealthy nations and steal enough of this wealth to make it profitable. On the other hand and with all (admittedly in bad taste) kidding aside, do you really think either Hillary or Obama will get us out of there soon? Keep in mind that many Democrats thought Saddam was a threat, what they said BEFORE we invaded and found no WMD means MUCH more than what they say as "Monday morning quarterbacks." Even with both houses of Congress and the Presidency in the Dems' hands, I'd bet we'll still be dying (and losing money) in Iraq for some time.
Written by kerry fox on 2/6/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Everyone owes it to him- or herself to go to costofwar.com to see all of the money we have pissed away on war during this, the tenure of the nation's WORST president EVER. Our economy is in the tank, and would be doing much better, if we hadn't spent over $490 TRILLION dollars on war. Think about that, guys. OVER FOUR HUNDRED AND NINETY TRILLION DOLLARS! You know, when it comes to the budget, the devil is in the details, Sid and Rhett's Wife - but Landrieu is spot-on. All of a sudden our lame duck, drunk, coke-snorting president is channeling his inner fiscal conservative, at least about everything other than the clusterf&^% of his own making in Iraq. And Sid, "No Child Left Behind" is a feel-good bill that has done more harm than good, and yes, I know "Ms. Snellings" voted for it. Now let's get back to the party! I was at Zulu this morning until my son was too tired to walk. Such is the life of a parent. Joyeux Mardi Gras à tout quelqu'un! TW
Written by Tee Dub on 2/5/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Sid, dear, you took the words out of our mouths. Mrs. Snellings is facing a lot of opposition and will be lambasting the Republican Party and members in the coming months. Do we agree with Bush? Not necessarily so. However, we never have and always made that clear. We believe that change is essential but rational moves must be taken. That does not include either Hillary or Obama. Nor, dears, does it suggest that we like the carefully dyed hair and smooth talkers. My and here it is Mardi Gras day and everyone is in the street. Well, dears, we are here in our comfortable chairs on the verandah reading the paper and watching the "festivities" in the streets. Sorry, Mrs. Snellings, you did not make it again this year. Let's get the shovel and start pitching some mud. Even the T-P is doing it today - against Sean O'Keefe. Hmmm, some personnel records are not available. Whoops getting off the subject. Later, dears, later.
Written by RhettsWife on 2/5/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Does Miss Landrieu feel that we shouldn't cut anything or that we should cut somewhere else? If she is a problem solver I would have hoped that she would have at least had some alternate ideas on what and where to cut. Oh well, it's easier to point and blame. maybe we could cut out retirement benefits for elected officials like senators & representatives...that would save a few million, which could be used to help fund the No Child Left Behind Act. Her response is more political posturing during an election cycle.
Written by Sid on 2/5/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE






Related Articles

Louisiana News: New Orleans, Baton Rouge Money, Senate Bailout Bill, PSC

Louisiana Governor Jindal Makes Case Before Pelosi, Congress Comes To Gulf

Louisiana News: Clinton, Obama Dream Team; Levees break; Entergy Rate Hikes, Britney Spears

Louisiana Senator Landrieu Criticizes President Bush's Budget

Louisiana's Congressional Delegation Members Discuss Bush Speech

Also by this Author


Louisiana Jindal, Moret On Fast Start Helping Businesses, Jobs

Barack Obama, Tom Daschle and Hillary Clinton

Obama, Daschle and Hillary Clinton

Louisiana Dance Site Promotes Steps, Networking and Health

Louisiana Business: Technology Awards, Obama, Gulf Coast, Auto Bailout, Shreveport Hilton





Sitemap
Advertise Buzzback Calendar About
Business Politics State National Sci/Tech Entertainment Sports World
© 2006-2007 BAYOUBUZZ.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



006 BAYOUBUZZ.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED