s William Buckley, True Conservative
Only search Bayoubuzz
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter
Privacy assured
For Email Marketing you can trust


Article Written on: Sunday-March-2-2008 BuzzBoards Calendar Contact Advertise About
Front Page Politics State National Business Technology Sports Entertainment



William Buckley, True Conservative


Written by: Dan Juneau


Buzz Right Back----E-Mail a Friend----Print Page


Obama Revolution: Texas and Ohio Super Tuesday 2  by Christopher Tidmore 

The founder of the modern conservative movement in America, William F. Buckley Jr., recently passed away at his home in Connecticut. To say that Buckley was an intellectual giant on the American political scene would be a gross understatement. As a young man in the 1950s, he launched the modern-day conservative movement with his book, “God and Man at Yale,” and his magazine, National Review.

            William F. Buckley had a profound impact on my intellectual development during my college years in the late 1960s. I entered college somewhat liberal and apolitical and, atypically, came out a politically active conservative. Reading National Review and Buckley’s columns had a major impact on me. I was first drawn to his writings by his masterful vocabulary, but soon the attraction to style gave way to the appreciation of substance.

            Shortly after leaving college and entering the world of work, I followed National Review’s exposé of the takeover of an African nation by a Communist regime backed by Cuban military elements. Buckley’s magazine was critical of the support given to the Communist government by a major multinational corporation. I happened to have an account with that company and, after reading the stories, I began to write a note on my payment each month, asking them to support freedom in that country. After about three months of note writing, I got a response from a middle-management executive with the company, trying to “enlighten” me about their policies. I wrote the executive back and stuffed his arguments in his ear—thanks to the information I had gleaned from the National Review.

I sent Buckley a copy of the corporate letter to me and my response. To my surprise, he sent me a note on his personal stationery that read as follows:

“Bravo! I found his response to be obscurantist. Stay true to your beliefs!  WFB”

That brief note became a prized possession.

When Buckley launched his long-running television program, “Firing Line,” I watched whenever possible. It was the civilized precursor of the political talk show programs on radio and cable television today—with an emphasis on “civilized.” Unlike the “shout them down” hosts on many of the current political programs, Buckley would never dream of trying to drown out a guest. He invited them to fully lay out their beliefs and then respond to civil questions regarding them. It was informative political discourse, not ambush journalism.

It is ironic that William F. Buckley passed away at a time when many are lamenting the current state of the conservative movement as reflected by the Republican Party. Buckley’s conservatism—embraced by heavyweights such as Goldwater and Reagan—was centered upon limited government, individual initiative, peace through strength, and morality that is practiced more than preached. Many bona fide conservatives today are concerned that the political party that is supposed to be the standard-bearer of the conservative movement has drifted into a partnership with overbearing government instead of being a counterbalance to it.

William F. Buckley was a cultured, highly educated, philosophical giant. He delighted in jousting with intellects such as John Kenneth Galbraith and Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who were anything but conservative, and he enjoyed their friendship. Ideology to Buckley was a philosophical set of principles—core beliefs—not simply a set of arguments and excuses used to attack a political opponent. He could not have been happy with what he observed recently in what now passes for political discourse in America.

He was a man who did indeed stay true to his beliefs—and did not substitute partisan bellowing for philosophical debate.  May he rest in peace.

 





 












 

_____________________________________________
_________________Advertisement________________

______________________________________________



 


Bookmark  and or share this article with:
Delicious reddit Digg Facebook StumbleUpon



Comments from BayouBuzz readers

Answer key to my thought experiment of 3/3/08; a "clandestine operation that (a) HAD to be accomplished but (b) could NEVER be disclosed" = Saving the Queen. "Performing the same trick with assassination as the theme" = Stained Glass.
Written by Kelly Haggar on 3/5/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


If one is a fan of cold war spy novels, Buckley’s books featuring CIA agent Blackford Oakes are a worthwhile read.
Written by Lorenzo St. DuBois on 3/5/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Kelly, Great point about the start of this thread and a beautiful reference from Mr. Buckley. Thank you.
Written by   on 3/5/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Since this thread began as a WFB obit/tribute, but went off sideways about universities, perhaps the contenders here should consider the book that started it all, God and Man at Yale. Then there's the all time WFB classic, "I'd rather entrust the government of the United States to the first 400 people listed in the Boston telephone directory than to the faculty of Harvard University."
Written by Kelly Haggar on 3/5/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


And one more one more thing. How much does your university skim off the top of research funding for overhead and administration? At LSU, it's about 40% if the grantee will allow them to get away with that. Now that's a measure of productivity that I can understand.
Written by   on 3/4/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


LSU is the 900 pound gorilla of higher education in this state, so that's what I use as an example. If any other state agency head openly bragged on how much the agency grew and how much more it spent, they'd be run out of town. They are more likely to brag on the costs that they cut or the payroll that they reduced. And then the icing on the cake was Lombardi's reaction on the issue of dedicating funds to highways. I think we can all agree that Louisiana needs infrastructure and highways are the most basic and most universal infrastructure improvement I can think of. But Lombardi screams like a baby at the thought of dedicating funds to this need, which is billions of dollars behind the funding curve. All because it means a smaller piece of pie left for him. If that doesn't show the arrogance and self-importance of the university system, nothing does. He's all about bringing Louisiana to the forefront, but apparently, he thinks he's the only game in town to get that done.
Written by   on 3/4/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


It is difficult to measure outcomes and efficiency in almost any complex business, especially service oriented businesses. And often, when they are forced to measure through some artificial tally, the measurements either too abstract or becomes goals in themselves, which is pointless. But universities are still the only entities I know of that openly and proudly measure themselves strictly on how much money they can spend.
Written by   on 3/4/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


One more thing - it is extremely difficult to evaluate "outcomes" or "efficiency" in a university setting. It's not like we're producing widgets, where you can just measure total output per hour spent, or some other simple measure of efficiency. As for your other point, I haven't followed LSU's "flagship" agenda too carefully, but almost certainly there are areas where more faculty are needed at LSU. I suspect that the "flagship agenda" wants to focus new hires in those "hot" areas. And fyi, research dollars stop flowing if nothing is done with them; i.e., one cannot sustain funding without having something to show for it (i.e., peer-reviewed research papers, patents, books, etc., etc.). So in a very real sense research dollars do reflect productivity. TW
Written by Tee Dub on 3/4/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Sure, I'm pompous, but at least I know what I'm talking about. You haven't a clue. You're just an opinionated bore, and a pretty intellectually challenged one at that. TW
Written by Tee Dub on 3/4/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


One more thing just to save time. I'll acknowledge being bitter if you'll acknowledge being pompous and we can cut out the repetition on those points, OK?
Written by   on 3/4/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


This is not about your credentials or accomplishments, it's about PhD's and the big business that is higher education. In state government and private sector, overstaffing is bad. In higher education, an increase is faculty is always considered progress. LSU constantly pressures us to help meet its flagship agenda. Every significant measure of flagship status that I have seen involves money, not accomplishment or efficiency. They compare themselves to other institutions on state funding, research funding, alumni donations, endowed chairs, etc. We are supposed to believe that every dollar spent at LSU is a dollar well spent. If income/revenue is a measure of quality, then you must agree that Halliburton is a flagship corporation, right?
Written by   on 3/4/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Boy, you are one bitter little man. Here's some simple market forces logic for you (you're a fan of market forces, right?) - there have to be some benefits to the job (because pay is not one of them), or no one would do it! And not all of us get paid for consulting work - all the consulting work I've done (and I do a fair amount) has been pro bono. My salary is the only pay I receive most years, aside from the occasional speaker's fees and honoraria. Pay raises at my institution are merit-based, so "dead wood" may have job security (assuming they do their jobs - one can be fired for malfeasance or not fulfilling your contractual obligations) - but they're not going to get pay raises! And you're bitter about research money? Do you think the government has no legitimate interest in fostering university research? You don't think government research dollars paid to universities are a smart investment? Do you think you can always trust corporations to tell you the truth about their products? Don't you think universities provide a forum for unbiased research? Or do you think the Tobacco Institute is a better model? TW
Written by Tee Dub on 3/4/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


You made my case. No supervision, work when you want to. Maximum job security in spite of effectiveness. Thanks for adding that to my case. You forgot to add grad students who do most of your dirty work, and a number of other perks. Also, I know lots of professors and their salaries are much higher than many other in the private sector or in government jobs. Plus, most government and private employees are restricted in the work they can do in their fields as consultants, while professors are allowed and even encouraged to promote their consultant services while on the payroll of the university. And as for private universities, you tell me how much of their research budgets come from government sources. Their paycheck might be from a private institution, but revenue for many of those institutions is heavily enhanced by government dollars.
Written by   on 3/4/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Wow, the no-name nincompoop strikes again! Boy, those are some sour, sour, grapes there! Here are a couple of reality checks - with the exception of Law, Business, and Medical School faculty, college professors don't make that much money. It's a comfortable living, but we're generally less well paid than our colleagues in the private sector who have equal levels of education. Some of us choose this life anyway - money's not everything! Among the advantages we have is that we (usually) get to set our own schedules, we generally don't have a supervisor (when I worked in the "real world" a change in boss could transform a great job into a miserable chore), and, once tenured, we have pretty solid job security. In the "real world" you are much more susceptible to lay-offs. So there are obvious trade-offs. Also, while I know some academics who couldn't cut it in most other lines of work, this clearly isn't the case for all, or even most, of us. I certainly could function, and have functioned, in the "real world"; I never worked anywhere in the "real world" where I didn't rise up quickly through the ranks to become a valued employee. Oh, and one more thing - many of us work for private universities - so we don't have a government job. I'd be willing to bet that even "Professor" would agree with some of the sentiments I've expressed here. TW
Written by Tee Dub on 3/4/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Either we will have limited government, or we will have politicians making payoffs with the money they take from our wages. This is as true with Democrats as with Republicans. Social programs, roads, schools, infrastructure and defense are legitimate government expenditures, but all the BS that is "awarded" to entities that have nothing to do with the core responsibilities of government is THE problem. This misuse of tax dollars existed long before Dick Cheney and his gang took office and will continue to be a problem as long as we allow it - or for as long as we believe things will change “if only the other party gets into power.”
Written by kerry fox on 3/4/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Fat government paychecks? Hmmm...Halliburton??
Written by Richard P. on 3/4/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


The reasons that PhD's are overwhelmingly liberal. Many are academic geeks who cannot function in a results based society, so they spend their lives in the academic world, awarding degrees and accolades to each other. (And earn fat government funded paychecks while they're at it). Many have no real world experience or accomplishments, so they choose to document their intellectual superiority over the common working class with their advanced degrees. Liberals mean big government - and big government money is necessary for intellectuals who hang around universities their whole life can afford to live in those upscale neighborhoods and explore their own eccentricities.
Written by   on 3/4/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Here's a thought experiment. Try thinking of a clandestine operation that (a) HAD to be accomplished but (b) could NEVER be disclosed. Then see if you can write a best-selling fiction novel examining the issues swirling around the questions arising from such an operation. Your next assignment is to perform the same trick with assassination as the theme.
Written by Kelly Haggar on 3/3/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Gee, NotsofastEddie, aren't we a little testy today? First of all, the fact that PhDs tend to be overwhelming liberal would suggest to me, at least, that liberalism is more intellectually appealing than is conservatism, but I am admittedly biased. Second, the quote you cite is quite disputed, with many folks arguing that Churchill never said anything of the sort, especially since his life was pretty much the opposite - i.e., young conservative who became more mellow with age. Read more at: http://www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_board/33/messages/799.html
Written by Tee Dub on 3/3/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Wasn't it Churchill who said "Anyone who's not a liberal at 20 hasn't got a heart; and anyone who's still a liberal at 30 hasn't got a brain." Unfortunately for most Americans, however, post-graduate degrees usually breed more liberalism--but then again that statistic is probably highly skewed because of the extremely large number of education graduate degrees awarded to NEA types.
Written by NotSoFast Eddie on 3/3/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


In making that observation, are you making a muse that substance would be of some relevant form of importance or necessity Kerry? No, 'Style' is more "En Vogue" these days, no substance necessary and if substance is involved, well then it is typically considered to by substance abuse. That is why we are doing so poorly with so much style.
Written by Style? In a pigs sty? on 3/3/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


What passes for political commentators and politicians today compare poorly to the likes of Buckley, Galbraith and Moynihan. I suspect that these days style is far more important than substance.
Written by kerry fox on 3/3/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


Buckley's books and works will are truly remarkable. But I remember one quip from a speech he gave at LSU in the early 80's. I believe that he noted that some of his forefathers were full-blooded yellow-dog Texas style democrats. He claimed that his grandfather voted for only democratic presidential candidates from Grover Cleveland through LBJ. And that string was even more remarkable since he died during the Truman administration.
Written by trifull on 3/3/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE


It is a shame that the conservative movement doesn't include more intellectuals like Buckley, who was a gentleman in the true sense of the word. I would argue that this is because conservatism, at least in its current American manifestation, is an intellectually dead movement, but that's for another post. I do have one bone to pick with Dan, and that is this - college graduates are, on average, more conservative than their non-college educated peers. So Dan's experience of coming out of college more conservative than he entered is hardly "atypical". TW
Written by Tee Dub on 3/3/2008
REPORT SPAM OR ABUSE






Related Articles

John Edwards Affair: Media Bias

Louisiana Politics, Jindal, Landrieu and Kennedy

Scott McClellan, Adams and Reese, Perdiago and Truth

Report: Ted Kennedy Has Brain Tumor Discovered After Seizure

Louisiana Vitter Fifth In DC Madam Case Is Bitter

Also by this Author


U.S. Inflation, Deficit Is Killing US

John McCain Needs Better Campaign Performance

Louisiana Making Progress On Business Taxes

Louisiana Businesses Can Play Big Role In Workforc Development

Louisiana Insurance Crises Helped By Competition





Sitemap
Advertise Buzzback Calendar About
Business Politics State National Sci/Tech Entertainment Sports World
© 2006-2007 BAYOUBUZZ.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



006 BAYOUBUZZ.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED