Only search Bayoubuzz
Join Our Email List
Email:



Article Written on: Sunday-July-1-2007 BuzzBoards Calendar Contact Advertise About
Front Page Politics State National Business Technology Sports Entertainment



UK Terror Means Critical Security Threats


Written by: BayouBuzz Staff


Buzz Right Back----E-Mail a Friend----Print Page


 

The UK is bracing itself for a fresh wave of terrorist attacks following three attempted car bombings in London and Glasgow on Friday and Saturday.

Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who took office on Wednesday, said in a national televised address on Sunday that “it is clear that we are dealing with people who are associated with al Qaeda.”

Security authorities have long feared that the deadly car bombings which have become daily occurrences in Iraq would spread to European cities.

Late Saturday, the new Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, raised the national terror threat to the highest level – ‘critical’ – which indicates that an attack is expected 'imminently'.

“This weekend’s bomb attacks signal a major escalation in the war being waged on us by Islamic terrorists,” said Lord Stevens, London’s former police chief and a terrorism adviser appointed earlier this week by Mr Brown. “Now al Qaeda has imported the tactics of Baghdad and Bali to the streets of the UK,” he wrote in an opinion piece published in Sunday’s News of the World.

British authorities said evidence indicated that the attack on Glasgow Airport, in which two men rammed a flaming Jeep into the entrance of the main terminal, had been a botched suicide mission.

One witness, Scott Leeson, said: “The car came speeding past. Then the driver swerved the car around so he could ram straight in to the door. He must have been trying to smash straight through.”

Some witnesses reported that the driver got jammed between concrete security bollards as he tried to plough into the terminal, which was bustling with families waiting to check in for flights on the first day of school holidays.

“They were obviously trying to get it further inside the airport as the wheels were spinning and smoke was coming from them,” said another witness, Lynsey McBean.

The driver then got out and poured gasoline over himself and the vehicle and lit them both, setting off a series of explosions.

“It was just a small fire at first,” said Robin Patterson. “Then there was an enormous explosion. The guy next to the car, his skin and clothes just fell off him.”

Engulfed in flames, the burning man threw punches at passengers and police and shouted “Allah! Allah!” as he tried to escape. He was restrained by police, who put out the flames with a fire extinguisher. Both the driver and his passenger were led away by police in handcuffs.

The driver was then taken to a local hospital to receive treatment. There, staff found on him a ‘suspect device’ believed to be a suicide belt, forcing the evacuation of the hospital. However, this proved to be a false alarm.

Five bystanders were also injured in the Glasgow Airport attack , none seriously.  On Sunday morning, the airport resumed flights, with passengers entering the terminal through a police cordon.

Glasgow police chief Willie Rae said Saturday’s airport attack and Friday’s attempted car bombings in London appear to have been connected. “There are clearly similarities and we can confirm that this is being treated as a terrorist incident,” he said.

Police discovered two Mercedes in central London in the early hours of Friday morning, each packed with gasoline-filled containers, gas cylinders, propane tanks and nails.

One car was parked outside the popular Tiger Tiger nightclub on Haymarket in London’s West End, a busy thoroughfare lined with clubs, theatres and restaurants and only a short walk from Piccadilly Circus. An ambulance driver treating one of the nightclub’s patrons for a head wound noticed vapors coming from the car and alerted police, who defused the explosives. The other car had been parked illegally on a nearby street and was towed away.

Police now believe that the bombers intended to use one explosion to draw panicking club patrons out on to the streets; then a second car bomb could have been detonated in the crowd to cause hundreds of deaths. This was the tactic used in the October 2002 Bali bombings, which killed 202 people.

Chris Driver-Williams, a retired British army major and now a terrorist bomb consultant to the US and British governments, told the Washington Post that the explosive firepower of the crude devices could have been “catastrophic”, especially since the valves on the gas cylinders were left open to create a fuel-air explosion.

This type of explosion uses oxygen to ignite a blast wave more powerful than many conventional explosives. However, these devices are difficult to ignite properly and could explain the flames coming from the Jeep even before its crash into the airport terminal in Glasgow.

Nevertheless, Mr Driver-Williams said that if such explosives were ignited properly, the result would be a “fireball the size of a house”.

The bombs assembled for the attempted London car bombings may reflect the increased restrictions on high-powered explosive materials in the UK.

“The danger here is that we are entering the era of the car bomb,” an unnamed  British intelligence source told The Independent. “In the past, al Qaeda-style terrorists have used high-explosive bombs aimed at symbolic, high-profile targets. But it’s easy to make a gas and nail car bomb without raising suspicion.”

Magnus Ranstorp, a Swedish terrorism expert has also said that the threat to the UK is the gravest in Europe because the UK is considered a close ally of the US and a major military partner in the invasion and occupation of Iraq.

It is not known yet whether the car bombers in London and Glasgow were assisted or funded by overseas terrorist organizations. Yet they are believed to be members of a loose network of terrorist cells that use the Internet to exchange information on the latest terror tactics.

Police have begun investigating the al Hesbah chat forum, which is frequently used by al Qaeda supporters. One message posted by frequent contributor Abu Osama al-Hazeen stated that “London shall be bombed” hours before the first car bomb was found in Haymarket. Police are trying to locate Mr al-Hazeen by following his ‘electronic footprint’.

Police are also using more conventional means to track down those involved, including forensic testing and security camera video footage. While the two Mercedes used were probably stolen, police have obtained a fairly clear CCTV image of one suspect who ran from the Mercedes in Haymarket at 1.30am on Friday. Investigators are now tracking his further movements using images taken by hundreds of cameras throughout central London. Police believe it is highly unlikely that those involved have tried to leave the country.

Five suspects have been arrested so far in connection with the incidents in Glasgow and London. In addition to the two men taken into custody at Glasgow Airport, police arrested two other suspects early Sunday on a major highway in Cheshire, northern England. A fifth suspect was arrested in Liverpool, where John Lennon Airport was closed overnight following the discovery of another suspicious vehicle. The airport has since reopened.

The UK’s new terror threat comes one week before the anniversary of the bombings which shook London on July 7, 2005. Just before 9 am that morning, three bombs exploded within fifty seconds of each other on Underground commuter trains; nearly an hour later, another bomb exploded on a double-decker bus. Fifty-two people were killed in the blasts, with more than 700 injured. It was later discovered that the bombings had been carried out by home-grown British Muslim extremists based in Birmingham.

British authorities have now ordered that security be tightened around the Wimbledon tennis tournament and Sunday’s concert honoring the late Princess Diana, which is expected to attract a crowd of 60,000 to London’s Wembley Stadium.

 

 



 

_____________________________________________
_________________Advertisement________________

______________________________________________



 


To Buzz Right Back on this article
click here
comments

It’s hard to believe that people are still going out of their way to blame Bill Clinton for 9/11. Osama bin Laden orchestrated the 9/11 attacks entirely untroubled during the first nine months of George Bush’s administration, because Bush failed to take the threat of Al-Qaida seriously. When Bush took office, he was warned by outgoing Clinton administration officials that Al-Qaida had bombed the USS Cole (not to mention the World Trade Center years earlier) and that he needed to take the threat seriously. Bush should have ordered military strikes but he obviously didn’t have the will. In contrast, Clinton’s military attacks on Al-Qaida training camps in Afghanistan had spun bin Laden into such a funk that he became determined to take his fight against the US to the next level – on US soil. Yet Bush blithely dismissed the threat of Al-Qaida, despite also receiving a series of intelligence warnings on January 25, July 10 and August 6, 2001. After snoozing at the controls for nine months, Bush then threw himself on the panic button on 9/11 – after 3,000 people lay dead in millions of pieces on American soil. History will remember, because it has been well-documented, that Clinton made counter-terrorism a top priority in his administration and had a terrorism advisor report to him directly on a daily basis. That stopped immediately once Bush took office, because he failed to take the threat seriously. Conservatives bang on incessantly about taking personal responsibility, but can’t extend that to George Bush for some reason. As it happened, on the morning of 9/11 Bill Clinton gave a speech in Australia (more than 12 hours ahead of the US) warning that the greatest threat facing Western nations was Islamic fundamentalist terrorism. Meanwhile, on the morning of 9/11, Condoleezza Rice had to shelve her planned speech in the US which concerned the paramount threat posed by Iraq. Go figure.

Written by freedomlovingliberal on 7/3/2007

Sharon, and you think Bush's appointees would be better? Based on what evidence? The Cheney Administration puts political hacks in positions of power all up and down the food chain. Look at Michael Brown (incompetent), look at the Iraqi Provisional Authority, where speaking Arabic or having diplomatic experience didn't matter, but one's position on Roe v. Wade did. I mean, give me a break. This President has been a complete and total disaster.

Written by Tee Dub on 7/3/2007

TeeDub, let me just put it this way. Clinton had at least 4 chances to take Bin Laden out. Did nothing. This is pretty much taken as fact since there is a tape of his speech in which he said as much. His reason for passing. His administration could not figure out what to charge him with. How about just taking him out when he's in a sniper's crosshairs? No trial necessary. Remember that there was a wall that was put in to keep the FBI & CIA from sharing information . This was done by Jamie Gorelick. If the "chatter had been shared" maybe we could have gotten lucky and been at the right airports but I doubt it. Kerry recieved a letter a couple of months before 9-11 telling him that some were concerned about security at Logan Airport. He did nothing and did not pass on the information and did not admit it until after the person came forward in the media. I think Bush should have fired every Clinton appointee on the day he took office. Of course that could not happen because he would not be able to replace them in a timely fashion. If there is blame to be given him, I believe that he was naive to think that all these guys would do their job regardless of who was President. I think that until this day he has not accepted the raw hatred the Democrats have for him. Bush is correct. The terrorists only have to be right once to succeed. We have to be right 100% of the time to be safe.

Written by Sharon on 7/2/2007

Since the other thread where I posed this question is more or less dead, I'd like to ask Patriot Warrior and Sharon the following: Does not the President who was in office on September 11th share some of the blame for 9/11, or does it all fall on the head of the former President that you two seem to hate so much?

Written by Tee Dub on 7/2/2007

Thank you Sharon - Yes, it is a frightening thought, that the Democrats with their pacifistic, and "heads-in-the-sand" ideas might be running the White House, as well as Congress!! They believe that GWB, and his administration have "stirred up" the terrorists, and have created all of their hate toward most of the world. The Democrats forget that Clinton had Osama Bin Laden in the gunsights, and got cold feet. They also forget about the USS Cole - (17) brave Americans slaughtered, on Clinton's watch. They forget about the US Embassy, Kenya - (39) dead, on Clinton's watch. They forget about the attack on the USAF dormitories, Saudi Arabia - (26) dead Americans, on Clinton's watch. And what did Clinton do each time that Americans were slaughtered? Absolutely nothing! And, that's exactly what a Democratic President would do, not if, but when we are next attacked under their so-called leadership.!! I guess that the Democrats would just try loving the terrorists to death!!!PATRIOT WARRIOR.

Written by PATRIOT WARRIOR on 7/2/2007

PW it is alarming to hear how many in this country really believe th Bush/Cheney makes all this stuff up to create fear or that the war on terror is a political bumper sticker. The next President will have to be strong to lead us through what will be another attack(s). Sad to say the citizens of this country are not as resolved as the Israelis or the Brits.

Written by Sharon on 7/2/2007

Do you believe that the "attacks" were not real? How do you go about stopping a terrorist attack before it occurs? Ask the Israeli's, they have the best security sytems in the world, and the terrorists still blowup their buses, trains, schools, nightclubs and shopping markets. How could we have prevented Tim Mcvea from blowing up the Federal Building in OKC? The terrorists are training young girls and boys from the age of six (6) years old, that it is an honorable act to blowup Christians and Jews, worldwide. How do you stop those kinds of people? Germany says that it is a matter of time before the terrorists attack their country. It has already occurred in Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Yemen, Kenya, Indonesia, Pakistan, Algeria, Morroco, Great Britain, Spain, and yes - the USA. As I have stated previously - the JIHAD terrorists, Al Queda, Hamas, Hezbollah, Taliban, and others, are coming, and they will bring hell with them! We must, as a nation, stay vigilant and strong. Still, it is impossible to stop terrorism - but if those who believe that negotiating with them will diffuse their radical and fanatical goals, those persons must live somewhere out there beyond the "last planet"! PATRIOT WARRIOR.

Written by PATRIOT WARRIOR on 7/2/2007

 

Written by   on 7/1/2007

It seems to me there is too little information concerning this event....once you get over the hype that is being created and start to look at the evidence......which could be created to instill fear and panic....I would view this as a scare tatic......brought about by who???? I really can't understand how or why overseas terriost group would mimic the IRA'S stratery...it somehow doesn't seem to fit the profile.... The UK has 4.2 million camera's on their people ....enough said.....where is MI5 and MI6? The question is are they doing their job? Maybe they are.

Written by   on 7/1/2007

______________________________________
Advertisement
==================================
Advertisement
==================================

Related Articles

By this Author
Louisiana Gets $244M From Stimulus For Schools

Louisiana Business: NCAA Final Four, Blue Cross, CABL, Hornets And Cable TV

New Orleans Saints: Michael Bell, Philadelphia Eagles, Justin Fargas, Raiders

US Senate Passes Jobs Bill: Landrieu For, Vitter Against

Bill Seeks Term Limits For Louisiana Judges, Sheriffs and District Attorneys






Privacy Statement - Service Agreement
(C) 2006 BAYOUBUZZ.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED