Tuesday, 12 January 2016 14:30
Landrieu moves on dismantling New Orleans statues prior to trial
Written by 
Rate this item
(0 votes)

mitch obamaDays before the federal court has even ruled on the lawsuits brought forward by four organizations concerned about historic preservation, Mayor Mitch Landrieu is moving forward with his plans to dismantle four Confederate monuments in New Orleans. Over the past few days, the Landrieu administration has sent work crews to the monument sites to make initial preparations to remove the monuments. 

On Thursday, a hearing will be conducted by U.S. District Court Judge Carl Barbier to review the lawsuits. Obviously, the Landrieu administration is confident that they will prevail in federal court. To act in advance of the court ruling shows how little regard Landrieu has for the legal system. It also shows that he is unconcerned about city finances. Supposedly, New Orleans is on financial life support. Otherwise, the city would have not to double parking meter rates or property taxes. Yet, sending work crews to the monument sites will cost money and these initial expenses will be wasted if the court decides that the monuments should stay. It seems money is no object when the goal is to tear down history and remove Confederate monuments. 

Not only is the administration moving forward with the monument dismantling process, it is also getting the funding in place, even though the actual cost to remove the monuments is in dispute. The experts on the issue, the Monumental Task Committee, have quoted an estimate of over $1 million to properly remove the monuments. In contrast, the city of New Orleans claims it will only cost $170,000 to eradicate the monuments. 

This amount will be paid by an anonymous donor who will not be revealed to the public. The donor will deposit the funds into an account with the Foundation for Louisiana, who then pay the city of New Orleans for the removal. Since the foundation is a private entity, it does not have to reveal the name of the donor to the public. 

So, public monuments will be publicly removed supposedly for the good of the public, but the costs of the dismantling will be paid by a private foundation through a private donation. This is corrupt, insider politics at its worst. The whole process is typical of how Mitch Landrieu governs. It is being handled in a secretive way, totally divorced from transparency which is the hallmark of good government. 

Under Mayor Mitch Landrieu, city business is often handled in the same way, typical old style politics with insiders and friends of the administration getting city contracts and business. 

For example, the monument removal is being done by a mysterious company in Baton Rouge, H & O Investments.  This company has no known expertise in removing historic monuments, but the owners are obviously friends of Mitch Landrieu. 

Flozell Daniels of the Foundation for Louisiana said that his organization will not reveal the donor’s name and is involved in the issue because they are supportive of the position held by “a majority of residents in the city.” Mr. Daniels is just plain wrong. According to a UNO poll conducted in December, only 34% of New Orleans residents support the monument removal, while 43% oppose the effort. Sadly, Daniels is mimicking Landrieu and not only disregarding the will of the people and overlooking the historical value of the monuments, but pursuing a left wing, politically correct agenda. 

It is an agenda that has not served New Orleans well in the past and it is not serving the city well in this sad case. 


Jeff Crouere

Jeff Crouere is a native of New Orleans, LA and he is the host of a Louisiana based program, “Ringside Politics,” which airs at 7:30 p.m. Fri. and 10:00 p.m. Sun. on WLAE-TV 32, a PBS station, and 7 till 11 a.m.weekdays on WGSO 990 AM in New Orleans and the Northshore. For more information, visit his web site at Ringside Politics.

Visit Jeff Crouere's Google Plus Page

Visit Bayoubuzz's Google Page

Login to post comments
Powered By JFBConnect
  • Edwards gets Graves challenge on Louisiana flood relief money
  • Gov. Edwards's pugnacious state of union gave wrong Louisiana vision
  • Trump plus 80 days: Jim Brown, Bernie Pinsonat talk US, Louisiana politics
  • Trump should be like Reagan, not like Bush

graves c 3Shades of Katrina?

    Is political partisanship raising its ugly head again in the face of another Louisiana disaster?  Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards thinks so.

    Edwards got some rough treatment from a congressional committee in Washington, D.C. when he testified before it recently about the state’s response to flood problems.

Read More

jbeWith equal parts pugnaciousness and disingenuousness, Democrat Gov. John Bel Edwards’ highly-politicized 2017 State of the State speech laid out a truly flawed vision for Louisiana going forward.

Read More

jim bernieIs Russia now our enemy, once again?

Did Donald Trump make the right move or was the latest attack, simply some wag the dog?

Read More

Iron nancy reagan 6n 1986, United States President Ronald Reagan authorized military aircraft to unleash a torrent of bombs in Tripoli, Libya to send a strong message to Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi. The attack was in response to Gaddafi’s involvement in the terrorist bombing of a Berlin disco that resulted in the death of American soldiers. 

Read More

BB Menu


Sen. Appel talks budget, economy


Dead Pelican

Optimized-DeadPelican2 1 1