Wednesday, 09 March 2016 12:06
Why the hysteria over Trump, Clinton, Sanders and Cruz? They are only us
Written by 
Rate this item
(0 votes)

hillary compressedby Mike Malak

Hysteria looms over this election like the clouds huddled over Noah’s ark.  But how different is it, really, from the left’s view of Nixon/Agnew in the 1960’s. Agnew endorsed beating protestors. To many Nixon was fascistic and a racist who, famously, called New York “Jew York.” Nixon, also, waged a terribly senseless war, some say to keep Vietnamese rice out of China, to which he, later, opened our doors. The Democrat, Johnson, believing his advisors, maintained that conflict, one that many say another Democrat, Kennedy, set in motion. 

Is Trump that much different from Nixon or, even more recently, the mendacious W? America has survived bad presidents before, and parties have imploded and gone out of business before. Even the founders squabbled about the, allegedly, deleterious results on democracy if a member of the opposing party was elected. The differences between Jefferson and Adams couldn’t have been greater, but we survived. Buchanan and Lincoln, though more civil, wrought considerably different changes of direction in the nation. Then, there’s Harding who needs no comparisons, except with himself. 

Though the convolutions of the Republican Party may resemble the death of the Know Nothings, Democracy survived their ignorance. It will survive again; even it takes a Trump to create a new dialectic through destruction of a grand old order.  There will always be an opposition movement to whoever is in power, whatever name, or names, it goes by. All this turmoil, however, obscures some obvious questions. 

Is the prospect of a Clinton presidency so fearsome that the hand wringing of so many is justified? Will a liberal Supreme Court alter the national character so much that the country goes off its rails? Will Sanders make of us Communists? Will the right’s jingoism, of which Cruz is another example, turn us into a dictatorship? Will crudeness, vitriol, and all forms of nonsense, political or otherwise, transform America into the land of the ungovernable? Likely not is the answer to all of the above. 

The favor the Republican Party, and the Democrats, too, to a lesser extent, have done us is to show that we should spend more on education so that thirty second bites do not determine anyone’s future; that character should stand for something, though that lesson may still be in progress. It urges the proposition that preachers, even the Pope, should return to their pulpits and speak about God instead of politics. It shows that we increase individual rights when we extend them to all people and, finally, that we fought our revolution to liberate people, not enslave them, mentally or physically. These are good thing to know. 

So what if Trump is a disaster, as he may be, or Cruz, Sanders or Clinton may be, too? Virtually each and every candidate this season demonstrates that we need to engage more deeply in a dialogue, not a colloquy, about who we are and where we want to be as a people, but let’s not forget that fundamental disagreement, in the pursuit of compromise, is in the nature of democracy. It’s a never-ending process. Life will go on regardless of whatever direction the people select, presently. Others can and will change that direction, in due course, because elders will still die and the young, always, will inherit.

Older people, in the supreme egotism of the moment, forget that they are merely transient beings on the face of the earth who, regrettably, overlook their heirs who are, presently, anxious. They are disgusted. And, they are, also, impatient. Don’t blame the candidates for the present state of affairs, however. There are mere reflections of the electorate, of us all. To assess what’s wrong it might be better to look in mirror and determine if we, not the candidates, are the ones wearing no clothes.

Mike Malak is an attorney, photographer and writer and an occassional contributor to

Login to post comments
Powered By JFBConnect
  • Cat Fights on the Hot Cement Confederate New Orleans statues
  • Ex-Saints, Bears, Bills, NFL Exec, Jim W. Miller discusses NFL Draft tomorrow
  • Trump's new plan; Curtains on tax returns release; 40% say Trump-Russia; Probing Obama admin
  • Watch Louisiana Governor Edwards talk about CAT Tax failure

catRarely, have I seen few issues that have generated as much raw heat, tension, and passion than the Confederate monuments controversy. 

Just as existed during the real civil war, where brothers battled brothers, social media is the battleground, particularly Facebook, pitting friend against friend.

On one side of the tense divide, there are those who are protecting the New Orleans civil war era monuments.  Burnt in effigy, forever, is the symbol of Mayor Mitch Landrieu for up-ending what the monument protectors consider to be the loving civil society of New Orleans.

Lately, events have turned somewhat militaristic.

Some protectors of the Confederate monuments have been staying vigilant, in person and online, even surveilling during the wee hours of the morning, waiting for the next Mayor Landrieu attack. On Sunday morning, with protections of snipers, masked workers and a dumbstruck audience, the worst of all of the monuments was cut and carried., the Liberty Monument. 

Read More

miller nfl live2 5It’s D-Day or Draft Day tomorrow in the NFL.

More specifically, Thursday represents the first day of the NFL draft 2017.

Read More


trump curtainsThe major President Trump news of the day focuses upon taxes, not only the tax cuts he is proposing but his own taxes, which he obviously, refuses to unveil.


Read More

edwards play money 1

At a press conference today, Louisiana Governor John Bel Edwards said the CAT Tax did not pass the House Ways and Means Committee.  The Governor, in addressing the media said that "the fate of that bill was decided long before we unveiled it".

Read More

BB Menu


Sen. Appel talks budget, economy


Dead Pelican

Optimized-DeadPelican2 1 1