Trump Talk:LIVE WITH JEFF CROUERE


After watching the video, click here
Wednesday, 09 March 2016 12:06
Why the hysteria over Trump, Clinton, Sanders and Cruz? They are only us
Written by 
Rate this item
(0 votes)

hillary compressedby Mike Malak

Hysteria looms over this election like the clouds huddled over Noah’s ark.  But how different is it, really, from the left’s view of Nixon/Agnew in the 1960’s. Agnew endorsed beating protestors. To many Nixon was fascistic and a racist who, famously, called New York “Jew York.” Nixon, also, waged a terribly senseless war, some say to keep Vietnamese rice out of China, to which he, later, opened our doors. The Democrat, Johnson, believing his advisors, maintained that conflict, one that many say another Democrat, Kennedy, set in motion. 

Is Trump that much different from Nixon or, even more recently, the mendacious W? America has survived bad presidents before, and parties have imploded and gone out of business before. Even the founders squabbled about the, allegedly, deleterious results on democracy if a member of the opposing party was elected. The differences between Jefferson and Adams couldn’t have been greater, but we survived. Buchanan and Lincoln, though more civil, wrought considerably different changes of direction in the nation. Then, there’s Harding who needs no comparisons, except with himself. 

Though the convolutions of the Republican Party may resemble the death of the Know Nothings, Democracy survived their ignorance. It will survive again; even it takes a Trump to create a new dialectic through destruction of a grand old order.  There will always be an opposition movement to whoever is in power, whatever name, or names, it goes by. All this turmoil, however, obscures some obvious questions. 

Is the prospect of a Clinton presidency so fearsome that the hand wringing of so many is justified? Will a liberal Supreme Court alter the national character so much that the country goes off its rails? Will Sanders make of us Communists? Will the right’s jingoism, of which Cruz is another example, turn us into a dictatorship? Will crudeness, vitriol, and all forms of nonsense, political or otherwise, transform America into the land of the ungovernable? Likely not is the answer to all of the above. 

The favor the Republican Party, and the Democrats, too, to a lesser extent, have done us is to show that we should spend more on education so that thirty second bites do not determine anyone’s future; that character should stand for something, though that lesson may still be in progress. It urges the proposition that preachers, even the Pope, should return to their pulpits and speak about God instead of politics. It shows that we increase individual rights when we extend them to all people and, finally, that we fought our revolution to liberate people, not enslave them, mentally or physically. These are good thing to know. 

So what if Trump is a disaster, as he may be, or Cruz, Sanders or Clinton may be, too? Virtually each and every candidate this season demonstrates that we need to engage more deeply in a dialogue, not a colloquy, about who we are and where we want to be as a people, but let’s not forget that fundamental disagreement, in the pursuit of compromise, is in the nature of democracy. It’s a never-ending process. Life will go on regardless of whatever direction the people select, presently. Others can and will change that direction, in due course, because elders will still die and the young, always, will inherit.

Older people, in the supreme egotism of the moment, forget that they are merely transient beings on the face of the earth who, regrettably, overlook their heirs who are, presently, anxious. They are disgusted. And, they are, also, impatient. Don’t blame the candidates for the present state of affairs, however. There are mere reflections of the electorate, of us all. To assess what’s wrong it might be better to look in mirror and determine if we, not the candidates, are the ones wearing no clothes.

Mike Malak is an attorney, photographer and writer and an occassional contributor to Bayoubuzz.com

Login to post comments
Powered By JFBConnect
  • Comey's Russia testimony was bad omen for Trump
  • Contenders to succeed N. Louisiana Congressman Mike Johnson, at starting gate
  • JBE spending governance leads to Louisiana's lower credit ratings
  • Will distorting RussiaGate backfire on Trump and Company?

watergateEven the Russians are talking about the impeachment of Donald Trump. The L.A. Times reported on Monday, March 20, 2017, “Sergei Markov, a Moscow-based political analyst and a former lawmaker with the ruling United Russia party, claimed the hearings into Russian meddling in the 2016 election are ‘related to an attempt to impeach Trump.’”

Read More

mike johnson2by Lou Gehrig Burnett, Publisher of Fax-Net
Saturday is election day
    The race for the District 8 seat in the Louisiana House of Representatives highlights election day this Saturday, March 25.
    It is a special election called to fill the seat of Rep. Mike Johnson, who was elected to Congress.  The winner will serve out the remainder of his term.

Read More

It shouldn’t be a surprise that Louisiana has endured adverse credit rating changes since edwards midDemocrat Gov. John Bel Edwards assumed office, completing a downgrade trifecta last week.

Read More

backgunThe post-mortem on the Donald Trump-Comey-House Intelligence Hearing Monday continues.

On the extreme right, from the jowls of someone who knows a thing or two about investigations against a President, Pat Buchannan, there is still “nothing there, there”.

 

Read More

BB Menu

latter-blum2

TRUMP TALK

Trump Talk: Ryancare, Russia, Investigations, Travel ban--with Jeff Crouere

Dead Pelican

Optimized-DeadPelican2 1 1