JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 7392

Thursday, 04 October 2012 07:08
Let’s replace those game shows we call Presidential election TV debates

Optimized-obama-romney-splitin 18 years as a political consultant, manager and strategist i helped prepare nearly 70 candidates for debates: tv debates, radio, civic groups, endorsing groups, you name it.



and the biggest problem i have with political debates is…the debate itself.

they have devolved over the years to contrived media events that are more game show and less enlightened discourse. this is because tv does game shows much better than they ever do enlightened discourse.

the real “stars” aren’t the candidates. they are merely the prepackaged meat puppets engaging in pre-scripted responses to the wrong questions; the only thing anyone takes from these exchanges are the coveted “gotcha” moments, when a candidate goes off-script, forgets his lines, or otherwise botches his delivery of the over-rehearsed script. and that inane moment becomes the lead story of the media until the next news cycle.

the real stars of the “debates” are the media themselves. one, or a few hand-picked talking heads sit neatly reading pre-planned questions from cue cards and pretending to engage the candidates. what they’re really doing is thrusting themselves into the spotlight, full of self-importance and gravity, acting their roles as arbiters of the people. no one elected them except their network ceo’s. and more often than not, they ask the wrong questions: questions designed to trip up a candidate, to highlight their own intellectual prowess, to elicit responses that will keep viewers from changing channels.

the whole charade is then followed by an hour of more innocuous talking heads, spinning their own versions of what just happened, touting their favorites, selling their interpretations of what the candidates “really” said.  their main job, remember, is to keep viewers from changing channels, so their bosses can charge advertisers even more money. this is all part and parcel of what everything that touches american politics today is all about: money.

and we the people tune in, like kids at a busy intersection, hoping to see the wreck when it happens. what we tune in for, presumably, is the truth. what we end up taking home with us in a doggy bag are the “gotcha” moments:

reagan to carter: “there you go again.”

lloyd bentsen to dan quayle: “senator, you are no jack kennedy.”

walter mondale to gary hart:“where’s the beef?”

rick perry, after saying he’d close down three government departments and could only name two: “sorry. oops.”

we deserve better than these events that continue to insult our intelligence, reduce the presidential election to who will win the brand new car after spinning the wheel, and are the most poorly scripted reality tv ever broadcast.

i have a modest proposal that would be more enlightening, honest and informative than the current rut. an idea that would get rid of the superfluous faux-debates, and serve we the people far better. and here it is:

give each candidate 30 minutes of air time, twice, a few days apart.  the democrat leads off one day, the republican leads off the next; or vice versa, it doesn’t matter.

let them speak, without notes, without prompters, for thirty minutes each, straight into the camera, looking the american people straight in the eye. let them say whatever they want about whatever they want, instead of being led by the nose by talking heads who currently dictate the agenda by controlling the questions.

this will accomplish several important things:

  1. it will allow the candidate to show exactly what their priorities are by how much time they spend on a topic.
  2. it will let us know how important those issues are by how the candidate places them in the context of their comments.
  3. it will also be a revealing event by letting us know which issues the candidate feels are not important enough to include in their presentations.
  4. if they are going to attack their opponent, they have to do it straight on: no gimmicks, no 3rd party pac-funded attack ads, no interruptions or interpretations by talking heads or even the opponent, until it’s the opponent’s turn to speak.
  5. most importantly, to me anyway, is that putting a person alone, in front of a live camera, without filters or distractions, for thirty minutes will reveal more about who that person really is and what they really believe than any slick ad or canned rally speech, because i can tell you this from experience: after about 15 minutes, that candidate is going to start to run out of bullshit. at 15 minutes, the stress of the event and the eyes of millions bearing down will bring out the true nature and character of that person. at 15 minutes, they will either start sweating and fumbling, or they will rise to the occasion and show themselves to be what we hope they are. and you the people will finally, really, get a glimpse of who that person really is, and what they really stand for.

and then, when the event is done, we will know what’s left. we will know that the real winner of such a debate isn’t either candidate. the real winner will be we the people, because that’s as close to seeing the real person running for president as we will ever get.



-sid arroyo

{jvotesystem poll=|7|}

{jvotesystem poll=|31|}




Is Jindal doing a good job?




Watch videos of  Jindal, read latest articles

Join Group




Want political or elections business?

Post your free or paid listings


louisiana capitol 2

US Political News

Bayoubuzz political blogs

Louisiana Political News

Best political blogs around the state



  Want more Louisiana news?               

Louisiana News

Louisiana Politics

Louisiana Business

Louisiana Government

 Baton Rouge News

Lafayette News

Shreveport  News

New Orleans News



Signup for Our Newsletter


Scan the QR Code above using your smartphone to signup for our newsletter.



Join Our Email List



Media Sources


Website: www.bayoubuzz.com
Login to post comments
Powered By JFBConnect
  • Cat Fights on the Hot Cement Confederate New Orleans statues
  • Ex-Saints, Bears, Bills, NFL Exec, Jim W. Miller discusses NFL Draft tomorrow
  • Trump's new plan; Curtains on tax returns release; 40% say Trump-Russia; Probing Obama admin
  • Watch Louisiana Governor Edwards talk about CAT Tax failure

catRarely, have I seen few issues that have generated as much raw heat, tension, and passion than the Confederate monuments controversy. 

Just as existed during the real civil war, where brothers battled brothers, social media is the battleground, particularly Facebook, pitting friend against friend.

On one side of the tense divide, there are those who are protecting the New Orleans civil war era monuments.  Burnt in effigy, forever, is the symbol of Mayor Mitch Landrieu for up-ending what the monument protectors consider to be the loving civil society of New Orleans.

Lately, events have turned somewhat militaristic.

Some protectors of the Confederate monuments have been staying vigilant, in person and online, even surveilling during the wee hours of the morning, waiting for the next Mayor Landrieu attack. On Sunday morning, with protections of snipers, masked workers and a dumbstruck audience, the worst of all of the monuments was cut and carried., the Liberty Monument. 

Read More

miller nfl live2 5It’s D-Day or Draft Day tomorrow in the NFL.

More specifically, Thursday represents the first day of the NFL draft 2017.

Read More


trump curtainsThe major President Trump news of the day focuses upon taxes, not only the tax cuts he is proposing but his own taxes, which he obviously, refuses to unveil.


Read More

edwards play money 1

At a press conference today, Louisiana Governor John Bel Edwards said the CAT Tax did not pass the House Ways and Means Committee.  The Governor, in addressing the media said that "the fate of that bill was decided long before we unveiled it".

Read More


Sen. Appel talks budget, economy


Dead Pelican

Optimized-DeadPelican2 1 1