Unfortunately, a firestorm of controversy is popping that trial education balloon which could greatly help our kids and which could also elevate Jindal’s own political career since he has promoted his education privatization legislation, so publically and so profusely.
Recently, Superintendent White, issued a press release in which he proudly claimed that all but one school under his voucher program has, what one might call, passing audit grades, which would enable White and Jindal to allow the parents and the national political world to believe that Louisiana should proceed to the higher grade of public opinion. Here is the press release, in relevant part:
Jun 28, 2013
99 Percent of Schools Show No Violation
BATON ROUGE, La. - The Department of Education today released findings of an annual independent financial audit conducted by Postlethwaite & Netterville and Provost, Salter, Harper & Alford, LLC, of non-public schools participating in the Louisiana Scholarship Program. This annual audit conducted by certified public accountants is required by state law and is similar to the process conducted once a year for district public schools and charter schools in Louisiana. To view similar public school audits click here. All but one school was found to be compliant with Bulletin 133. For minor findings that were noted, the auditors provided guidance for adjustments and reconciliations. To access the full audit of non-public schools participating in the scholarship program, click here and here.
"We appreciate the transparency and participation of schools throughout this audit. This is a rigorous process to ensure that all parties involved are following the guidelines set out by both the Legislature and BESE in order to ensure high standards and accountability for this program," said State Superintendent John White.
The audit has raised a number of issues and has prompted heated debate through angry editorials including a recent response from White who has taken issue with the opinion of Bob Mann of LSU.
Mann and others appear to be claiming that White’s press release is deceptive at best and fraudulent at worse. They claim that the schools’ bookkeeping was so sloppy that the audit results are inadequate. Along that line, they question why White didn’t even mention the lack of credible financial information that would undermine the accuracy of any audit test results.
A recent blog by a former teacher, Mike Deshotels, who focuses upon Louisiana education, I believe, provides an interesting overview in his blog, The Louisiana Educator: http://louisianaeducator.blogspot.com/
Wednesday, July 10, 2013
- Whiteexposesappalling results of an audit of Louisiana's voucher schools. The blogCenLamar.com points out that the audit reports are so incomplete in their findings and reveal such lack of compliance with rules for tracking of funds that they should be considered worthless in examining the use of taxpayer funds for student vouchers.
AnAssociated Press story by Melinda Deslattedated June 28 also pointed out that107 of the 117 voucher schools did not provide enough informationto the auditorsfor the state to determine whether or not the voucher money was spent according to the state guidelines.
This press release by the DOE dated June 28 made the following statements:
"Of the 117 schools audited all were found to be compliantwith Bulletin 133 except for the New Living Word school."
As a result, SuperintendentWhitehas banned the New Living Word School from further participation in the voucher program
The press release also stated:
"These findings are evidence that the oversight process is workingand that there will be zero tolerance for fiscal mismanagement of taxpayer dollars," Superintendent of EducationJohnWhitesaid in a statement.
My question is:How can the DOE claim that 116 schools were found to be compliantwith Bulletin 133 when the great majority of schools did not provide the necessary documentation to demonstrate that they complied with Bulletin 133? And forJohnWhiteto say that the oversight process is working and that there will be zero tolerance for fiscal mismanagement of taxpayer dollars is ludicrous! Just banning one school from the program when the majority of schools refused to provide the information needed to judge their compliance does not in any way equate to zero tolerance.
This press release basically describing the audit as representing a clean bill of health for the voucher schoolsis at a minimummisleading and could be more accurately described as a deliberate effort by the DOE to deceive the public.
Inan earlier post on this subject,LamarWhitecalled forJohnWhite'sresignation because of incompetence in the administration of the voucher program.
I believe it is certainly necessary that BESE, the governor and the legislature at least order an investigation of the Department's monitoring of the voucher program by the Inspector General and the Legislative Auditor to determine if there is neglect of duty or incompetence on the part of our State Superintendent.
In response to this debate and particularly Bob Mann’s column, White recently responded in a letter to the Times Picayune:
Here is the most relevant passage in that letter:
He manipulates the language of audits to disparage private schools that offer students in struggling public schools an alternative, when the facts of the audits are clear: of 117 schools offering scholarships to Louisiana families, 116 showed no violations of law. In the one case that did, government did the right thing and ended the school's participation in the program.
While White appears to be technically correct, that 116 showed no violations of law, if that is the only purpose of the audit then perhaps there should be no discussion.
But what Mann and others are focusing upon is not just the credibility of White’s press release but also the accuracy of the end results of the audit.
So, allow me to present my perspective of this controversy with my own little make-believe story:
Little Johnny and Susie appear in the office of the superintendent.
White: “Well Johnny, how did you do on your report card today?”
Johnny: Wow. I made excellent grades. I made 4 A’s.
White: Well Johnny, that is super but you had seven courses altogether, didn’t you?
Johnny: (Looks down to the floor) Well, Mr. White, I made three F’’s.
White: Okay, and Susie, how did you do?
Susie: Gee, Superintendent White, I received five A’s, isn’t that great?
White: Well Susie, yes indeed. But you also had seven courses.
Susie: I received I’s in those courses because the grading is incomplete.
White: Johnny and Susie, I am proud of your performances in which you received A’s. But, why didn’t you tell me all of your entire course results. You know what you’re teachers tell you about telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Next time, I expect all of the information and not half-truths or spin.
Yes my analogies are elementary and perhaps not directly on point. I also admit that White’s audit test grades are probably literally correct. But, that is far from the entire story.
In his letter to the editor, other than attacking Mann and other critics for engaging in politics, he failed to address the real issues here. The schools record-keeping under his program and under his supervision was so poor that perhaps out of fairness, the 116 schools should receive an incomplete, instead. After reviewing the information with accurate, reliable and clean bookkeeping, we can pass judgment upon whether the schools have indeed passed and therefore, ready to proceed onward.
Also, there is an even more fundamental test that needs further review—the test of credibility.
When a Superintendent of a very controversial education reform program openly touts, in his own press release, results based upon dubious facts, there is every reason for others to question the validity of the message and the credibility of the messenger.
Whether Mr. White told a “Johnny” or “Susie” story in press release and then later in his letter to the Times Picayune, can be debated. But it is clear that he did not affirmatively disclose the shortcomings of the audit.
The reform program, which I believe has many merits, has been under great scrutiny. Gov. Jindal’s own political future is significantly wrapped around its very success.
It would seem that before parents and the public can believe the merits of Louisiana Believes promoted by the Jindal administration, it is absolutely critical for Louisiana parents to first believe the statements and the facts pushed of its top proponents.
The words uttered by our officials should not be post-presidential debate “spin room” or propaganda. Our kids future is more important than anyone else’s political futures.
So, kids, class dismissed