Monday, 03 March 2014 08:29
12 Years A Slave, Dallas Buyer Club got expensive Louisiana Film Tax Incentives
Written by 

side oscarThis article was written prior to the Academy Awards Ceremony.  Bayoubuzz Note: Oscar winning, Best Picture, "12 Years a Slave" and winner of 4 Oscars, Dallas Buyer Club received film tax credits for being filmed in Louisiana.

Tonight, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences will present its Academy Awards to the filmmaking industry for 2013, giving Louisianans another chance to cogitate on whether the hundreds of millions of dollars the state forgoes annually in motion picture tax credits really is worthwhile.

 Two years ago, the state was honored with a product from its own studios – funded in part by these state incentives which in most common form kicks back 30 percent in credits to investors (different kinds of payments for other related activities allow a different percentage to be received) – with an “Oscar,” but this year, even if no homegrown product made any shortlists, the state’s connection in dollar terms will be more substantial. Two nominated films are in line to receive the credits, which could be worth as much as $8 million.

In practical terms, that means that these credits, some of which may be used by the producers, but the majority of which typically are sold at a discount to Louisiana persons with relatively high state tax burdens, will vacuum that much out of revenues that could go to the state. This means fewer services get rendered by the state and/or taxes must rise to fund otherwise furloughed services, while subsidizing the making of movies that allows many wealthy interests to profit and gets funneled to jobs that average over $10,000 than the overall average for jobs in the state.

If the amount paid out came back to taxpayers in terms of revenues generated by the state for the activity, this would be unobjectionable. But since the program started, it never has come close, returning roughly one dollar for every seven spent and in the last year for which there are data (2012) cost about $12,000 an estimated job (both direct and indirect) created (but in terms of directly-created the cost is three times that, and many go to out-of-state residents). A separate report last year by Louisiana Legislative Auditor Daryl Purpera concluded through 2008-12 $800 million went out the door with roughly $120 million coming back. It’s little wonder, as one legislator once lamented, that at this rate soon more will be shelled out for making movies than on state general fund spending on higher education.

Purpera made the program one of the highlights of the annual report made by his office, that this year revealed billions in state revenues forgone over the past few years because of tax exceptions like this, accentuating its high amount and low rate of return. The report is to provide information for policy-makers in the upcoming legislative regular session, but the information regarding tax exceptions is a moot point since the Legislature constitutionally is barred in this session from removing or reducing any of these. Thus unaltered the film subsidization will continue for at least another year.

Or three. Next year, with elections around the corner, legislators from the three areas that represent the vast bulk of credit-taking activity – New Orleans, Baton Rouge, and Shreveport – will be loath to incur the wrath of the special interests profiting from the credit and even those who posture as fiscal reformers will show instead they have feet of clay and will prevent any majority from coalescing to reduce the credits (much less gain the two-thirds majorities to wipe them out). Then comes even-numbered 2016 with the same prohibition as this year. So it may not be until 2017 something gets done, that no doubt leaves 2018 as the first year it could be implemented, with perhaps by then a billion more bucks out the door in these credits.

So, Louisiana readers, pat yourselves on the back if any films drawing upon state credits win tonight. Because for the overwhelming majority of you who are net payers in money or services forgone because of this law, that’s all you’ll get in return.



Jeffrey Sadow

Jeffrey Sadow is an associate professor of political science at Louisiana State University in Shreveport.   He writes a daily conservative blog called Between The Lines

Login to post comments
Powered By JFBConnect
  • LABI's Waguespack pokes Edwards tax delay, promotes Louisiana Legislative outlook
  • Louisiana ranked 25th in medical doctors, hospitals
  • Quin Hillyer: Freedom Caucus,hardliners "just Screwed the American people"
  • Trumpcare loss a mere distraction from RussiaGate

wag edwards tweetIn the age of rapid response, social media, President and CEO of the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry took to twitter to apparently poke the Democrat Governor and to promote his own tour of his own legislative package, or legislative outlook tour, beginning today.

Today, Stephen Waguespack of LABI tweeted in response to The Advocate’s Tyler Bridges article that John Bel Edwards would be delaying his release of his tax overhaul package that was scheduled for today.

Read More

doctors wallet hubWith Louisiana's Louisiana legislative session about to commence early April, the state has another ranking to consider--how it ranks for medical doctors.


Read More

quin hillyer health 5Have the conservative Freedom Caucus and advocacy organizations such as Freedom Works and Heritage Action "screwed the American people"?

That's the feeling expressed by at least one long-time conservative Republican, who, as millions of others were outraged by the destruction of the Obamacare "repeal" and replacement, on Friday.  

Read More

comey sitThe GOP will likely claim that the bogus “ Assisted suicide counseling” will still be covered since Obamacare remains the law of the land. That’s good news for GOP legislators who planned on voting “yes” on its repeal. The rich, also, should be happy the old law remains because they have wounds that need tending after the mega tax breaks for them that were inserted in Trumpcare went the way of leeching. The failure to repeal, of course, is the Democrats fault. Trump said so, but he has reason to be happy, too. The health care debacle managed, if just for an hour, or two, to deflect attention away from Russia.

Read More



Trump Talk: Ryancare, Russia, Investigations, Travel ban--with Jeff Crouere

Dead Pelican

Optimized-DeadPelican2 1 1