Friday, 10 December 2010 12:27
Obama’s Briar Patch On Tax Deal Stimulus With GOP?
Written by 

As soon as the outlines of a deal between President Obama and Republicans to extend tax rates were announced, jihad was declared by liberal members of Congress and the left-leaning blogs. When the president held a quickly called White House press conference to attempt to counter the furor on the left, the liberal members of the press corps all but called him a “punk” for “caving in” to the Republicans. The liberal fury not withstanding, there may be method in the president’s perceived madness.


            In spite of Democratic claims to the contrary, the $850 billion “stimulus” package enacted on basically a straight party line vote early in Obama’s presidency has been generally perceived to be a bust. It pumped money into government coffers but did little to help the private sector and individual taxpayers, and it hasn’t moved the unemployment rate downward. If the president attempted to even suggest moving another stimulus package, he would be shouted down. The election results on November 2 are a clear indication that voters have had it with big government spending schemes. But a close look at the compromise fashioned between Obama and the Republicans reveals a proposal that is a $900 billion stimulus masquerading in tax rate extension clothing.

            If the proposal is enacted by Congress (perhaps a significant “if” considering the banshee screams of liberal Democrats), it would keep hundreds of billions of dollars circulating in the private economy instead of going into government coffers where the odds are it would be spent instead of paying down the deficit. The personal income tax rates of all taxpayers would remain at current levels. The capital gains and dividend tax rates would also remain the same—a reassurance not only to investors but also to seniors whose retirement portfolios would be affected by any increase. The alternative minimum tax “patch” would be in place which would prevent a significant rise in the income taxes paid by 21 million Americans. The plan also calls for a one-year reduction of two percent in the Social Security payroll tax. This could result in a tax savings of up to $4400 for working couples. The compromise also calls for the extension of tax credits for children and college tuition. It also would allow businesses to take a 100 percent credit next year for investments in plant, equipment and technology, and it would extend the credit for hiring the unemployed.

            The compromise between President Obama and the GOP can legitimately be criticized by various factions. But it is a better stimulus vehicle by far than the 2009,  $850 billion boondoggle. The U.S. economy continues to languish. Removing more money from the private sector will further suppress economic growth. Short-term approaches to put more money directly into the pockets of consumers will definitely stimulate the economy more than pumping more money into governments. After the painful economic lessons of the past two years, perhaps the president is starting to understand that stark reality.

            The Democratic diehards in Congress who are furious at Obama portray him as a weakling who folded early and was “rolled” by the Republicans. Perhaps. Perhaps not. The president is painfully aware that the economy needs stimulation. He is equally aware of the fact that “stimulus” is now a dirty word. The deal with the Republicans may well be a crafty plea by the president not to be thrown into the briar patch of a massive stimulus artfully designed as a tax rate extension. Among the briars, he may be smiling and hoping that this stimulus geared more to the private sector may be his best hope of being re-elected in 2012.


Bayoubuzz Newsletter - Sign Up Below



Login to post comments
Powered By JFBConnect
  • Edwards gets Graves challenge on Louisiana flood relief money
  • Gov. Edwards's pugnacious state of union gave wrong Louisiana vision
  • Trump plus 80 days: Jim Brown, Bernie Pinsonat talk US, Louisiana politics
  • Trump should be like Reagan, not like Bush

graves c 3Shades of Katrina?

    Is political partisanship raising its ugly head again in the face of another Louisiana disaster?  Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards thinks so.

    Edwards got some rough treatment from a congressional committee in Washington, D.C. when he testified before it recently about the state’s response to flood problems.

Read More

jbeWith equal parts pugnaciousness and disingenuousness, Democrat Gov. John Bel Edwards’ highly-politicized 2017 State of the State speech laid out a truly flawed vision for Louisiana going forward.

Read More

jim bernieIs Russia now our enemy, once again?

Did Donald Trump make the right move or was the latest attack, simply some wag the dog?

Read More

Iron nancy reagan 6n 1986, United States President Ronald Reagan authorized military aircraft to unleash a torrent of bombs in Tripoli, Libya to send a strong message to Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi. The attack was in response to Gaddafi’s involvement in the terrorist bombing of a Berlin disco that resulted in the death of American soldiers. 

Read More


Sen. Appel talks budget, economy


Dead Pelican

Optimized-DeadPelican2 1 1