Friday, 05 June 2015 14:04
The many merry GOP Presidential candidates should have their say
 

dwarfsThis was a busy week in the GOP presidential sweepstakes as two candidates jumped into the race: U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and former Texas Governor Rick Perry. Currently, there are ten announced candidates running for the Republican presidential nomination and the number will surely grow. In the coming days, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush will officially announce his presidential bid. Soon thereafter, Ohio Governor John Kasich, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal and business tycoon Donald Trump will probably enter the fray. 

 

In the end, there could be 16 or more Republican presidential candidates. The candidates can be grouped using in many different ways. For example, former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee and former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum will emphasize social issues, Perry and Graham will emphasize national security and U.S. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky will focus on protecting the liberties Americans are guaranteed by our Bill of Rights.  However, there is another way to group the candidates: conservative or RINO (Republican in Name Only). Clearly, Bush will be the best funded and leading RINO, but it is not clear who assume the mantle as the top conservative contender. 

Due to the plethora of conservative candidates, some commentators are lamenting our embarrassment of riches. They are calling for conservatives to unite behind one candidate who can defeat Bush. However, it is far too early for any consolidation among the candidates. Voters need to see the candidates in action, witness them in a debate setting and learn where they stand on the major issues. In essence, the Republican race is an example of a political free market as voters will be given a wide variety of choices and allowed to choose the best candidate. 

The decision should rest with the voters, not a kingmaker or a news network.  It is critical for all of the news networks to expand their televised debates to include all of the major candidates, not just the “top ten.” This is not college football, it is the future of the nation which is being determined and limiting the field of candidates is not only premature, but it can adversely impact the decision making ability of voters.

The networks are supposedly going to decide the “top ten” based on an average of early polls, but they are too influenced by name recognition alone. The networks need to expand the debate format, give more time for questions and accommodate the larger field. This is an essential public service as the future of our nation is at risk. This election will be the most important one in our lifetime as the next President must repair the damage done by Barack Obama to our nation’s economy, our national security and our social fabric, namely race relations. 

With the survival of our nation at stake, it is worth the time and effort for the networks to expand their format. The real question is whether the geniuses at the RNC will allow liberal reporters to moderate the debates. In the 2012 general election, every presidential and vice presidential debate was moderated by a liberal. It is essential for the GOP to control the process much better in this election. 

While the stakes are high and the country is in serious trouble, American voters can make a positive change by electing a true conservative President in 2016. A conservative agenda will be impossible if the GOP nominates another RINO who will lose in the General Election. 

Republican voters have very important responsibilities such as nominating a conservative, but they need adequate information to perform their duties. The debates will be the best way to gauge the candidates, so the news networks must not be allowed to artificially limit the debates to ten candidates. 

Fortunately, this race will feature the largest field of viable candidates ever presented to Republican voters. At such a critical juncture, Republican voters need to choose the very best candidate, so it is desirable to have many options to consider, in fact, the more the merrier. 

In this way, Republican voters can select the very best conservative who can defeat Hillary Clinton and spare the nation a third Obama administration. 

Media Sources

BayoubuzzSteve

Website: www.bayoubuzz.com
Login to post comments
Powered By JFBConnect
  • Edwards gets Graves challenge on Louisiana flood relief money
  • Gov. Edwards's pugnacious state of union gave wrong Louisiana vision
  • Trump plus 80 days: Jim Brown, Bernie Pinsonat talk US, Louisiana politics
  • Trump should be like Reagan, not like Bush

graves c 3Shades of Katrina?

    Is political partisanship raising its ugly head again in the face of another Louisiana disaster?  Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards thinks so.

    Edwards got some rough treatment from a congressional committee in Washington, D.C. when he testified before it recently about the state’s response to flood problems.

Read More

jbeWith equal parts pugnaciousness and disingenuousness, Democrat Gov. John Bel Edwards’ highly-politicized 2017 State of the State speech laid out a truly flawed vision for Louisiana going forward.

Read More

jim bernieIs Russia now our enemy, once again?

Did Donald Trump make the right move or was the latest attack, simply some wag the dog?

Read More

Iron nancy reagan 6n 1986, United States President Ronald Reagan authorized military aircraft to unleash a torrent of bombs in Tripoli, Libya to send a strong message to Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi. The attack was in response to Gaddafi’s involvement in the terrorist bombing of a Berlin disco that resulted in the death of American soldiers. 

Read More

latter-blum2

Sen. Appel talks budget, economy

TRUMP TALK

Dead Pelican

Optimized-DeadPelican2 1 1