Friday, 31 July 2015 14:17
Dardenne's request that Vitter repay state for Super PAC fees will fall on deaf ears
Written by 

vitter-jindalCandidate Jay Dardenne has now jumped on the David Vitter-pay-back-the-state bandwagon as did the Louisiana Democratic Party. A few weeks ago, Dardenne requested that Bobby Jindal repay his state police protection expenses for his campaign back to the Louisiana treasury.

On Thursday, the Advocate published,

Donors can make unlimited contributions to a super PAC supporting Republican U.S. David Vitter for governor. But it came at a financial cost to Louisiana taxpayers.
The Fund for Louisiana’s Future challenged the constitutionality of a Louisiana law limiting contributions in federal court last year and won.
The victory led to Louisiana taxpayers paying $69,336 in attorney fees and other legal costs run up by the political action committee in its successful challenge.
The payment by the state of Louisiana’s risk management self-insurance program shows up on a campaign finance report filed by The Fund.
“When you challenge a provision of law based on constitutionality you are entitled to pray for relief (of costs) when you are successful,” state ethics administrator Kathleen Allen said Wednesday.

In a press release today, Dardenne said,

“ Lt. Governor Jay Dardenne released the following statement in regard to the legal fees the state of Louisiana reimbursed to the Fund for Louisiana’s Future, a Super PAC supporting Senator David Vitter:

“For Senator Vitter to force the state of Louisiana to pay $70,000 in legal fees to his campaign operation is shameful. I’m not sure who is worse - Governor Jindal sticking taxpayers with the bill while running for President or Senator Vitter sticking taxpayers with the bill so he can raise unlimited amounts of money from out-of-state special interests.

Given the amount of money they have raised, they should both give taxpayers a break and pay their bills themselves.”

Likewise, the Louisiana Democratic Party, in an email today said, in part:

“Despite having posted obscene fund-raising totals thanks to his support among the super-wealthy special interest crowd, Sen. David Vitter continues to lean on “campaign welfare” wherever possible, building his cynical, hands-off campaign for governor at the expense of Louisiana taxpayers and families. Thanks to the efforts of his high-priced legal team and their elite corporate backers, Vitter was able to force Louisiana taxpayers to cough up nearly $70,000 toward one of his shadowy “political action committees.” In a page ripped from Gov. Bobby Jindal’s partisan playbook, Vitter is petulantly defending the right of faceless corporate paymasters to buy and sell elections in Louisiana and across the country.”

Is the latest Dardenne request legitimate or politics? Even if David Vitter wanted to repay the state, which of course, he would not, is he obligated to do so?

"The Fund for Louisiana’s Future” which has raised roughly 4 million dollars. The PAC is supporting Vitter, and the Senator will continue to have its support whether he wins the gubernatorial election or, if not, should he run again for US Senate. Also, the Super PAC has former Vitter operatives working for the PAC rather than the campaign. Also, as of March 9, 2005, the DAVID VITTER FOR US SENATE
METAIRIE,LA has contributed to the Super PAC $890,000. A blind man would see somewhat of a coordinated relationship between Vittter, his federal campaign, the Super PAC and the state campaign.

However, the question is, how close of a relationship and coordination? The transactions surely raises questions. But, given that the law is uncertain and we are in unsettled new terrirtory, unless it were legally proven that there existed closer coordinating relationships, at most, the request by Dardenne, although seemingly a legitimate one, will fall on Vitter campaign (and probably his supporters) deaf ears

 

Login to post comments
Powered By JFBConnect
  • Cat Fights on the Hot Cement Confederate New Orleans statues
  • Ex-Saints, Bears, Bills, NFL Exec, Jim W. Miller discusses NFL Draft tomorrow
  • Trump's new plan; Curtains on tax returns release; 40% say Trump-Russia; Probing Obama admin
  • Watch Louisiana Governor Edwards talk about CAT Tax failure

catRarely, have I seen few issues that have generated as much raw heat, tension, and passion than the Confederate monuments controversy. 

Just as existed during the real civil war, where brothers battled brothers, social media is the battleground, particularly Facebook, pitting friend against friend.

On one side of the tense divide, there are those who are protecting the New Orleans civil war era monuments.  Burnt in effigy, forever, is the symbol of Mayor Mitch Landrieu for up-ending what the monument protectors consider to be the loving civil society of New Orleans.

Lately, events have turned somewhat militaristic.

Some protectors of the Confederate monuments have been staying vigilant, in person and online, even surveilling during the wee hours of the morning, waiting for the next Mayor Landrieu attack. On Sunday morning, with protections of snipers, masked workers and a dumbstruck audience, the worst of all of the monuments was cut and carried., the Liberty Monument. 

Read More

miller nfl live2 5It’s D-Day or Draft Day tomorrow in the NFL.

More specifically, Thursday represents the first day of the NFL draft 2017.

Read More

 

trump curtainsThe major President Trump news of the day focuses upon taxes, not only the tax cuts he is proposing but his own taxes, which he obviously, refuses to unveil.

 

Read More

edwards play money 1

At a press conference today, Louisiana Governor John Bel Edwards said the CAT Tax did not pass the House Ways and Means Committee.  The Governor, in addressing the media said that "the fate of that bill was decided long before we unveiled it".

Read More

latter-blum2

Sen. Appel talks budget, economy

TRUMP TALK

Dead Pelican

Optimized-DeadPelican2 1 1