LIVE: VIDEO AND POLITICS

Monday, 31 August 2015 12:13
Dardenne tries Vitter prostitution claim, but effort will fail
Written by 

dardenne-vitter 5It’s official: Lt. Gov. Jay Dardenne has gone into desperation mode in his quest for Louisiana’s top office.

 

For months, the governor’s race dynamics have presented a challenge to him. Sen. David Vitter’s strong conservative credentials plus ability to meld populist preferences into him make his a formidable Republican challenger. Meanwhile, Democrats wishing to have an affair with Dardenne on their endorsed standard-bearer state Rep. John Bel Edwards, given the former’s good government record while in the state Senate but willingness to raise taxes to fund it, have another suitor from the right-of-center in Republican Public Service Commissioner Scott Angelle. With the vote closer to the center split by Dardenne and Angelle, Vitter and Edwards have clear sailing to dominate among voters at the ends of the ideological spectrum, leaving Angelle and Dardenne dragging the rear and considerably behind the others.

Now with fewer than eight weeks remaining until the Oct. 24 election, the stability of these dynamics suggest nothing will change as long as the candidates continue to stress the same themes and issues. So, perhaps shaken by a recent report, Dardenne decided to do just that.

Prior to a candidate forum sponsored by a Baton Rouge radio station, Dardenne suffered a public relations setback when information backed by photographic evidence emerged suggesting coordination between his political action committee and his campaign, which is forbidden by law. Of course, the fact that leaders from both organizations were seen yukking it up over dinner and drinks does not mean they were plotting strategy together in violation of the law, but when the Vitter camp publicized the information and implied this motivation, at the very least it did not look so good for Dardenne, who has emphasized ethics issues as part of his platform.

Vitter’s fundraising prowess likely has contributed to Dardenne’s polling woes, and all the other candidates have decried Vitter’s ability to have raised on his behalf, by campaign or by PAC, more money than all of their resources combined as something, if not illegal, at least somehow unseemly. Dardenne ratcheted up this theme when in response to the Vitter-revealed photograph and comments by having his campaign question the separateness of the Vitter campaign and PAC as a principal of each are married to each other.

But then, at this forum, Dardenne took the opportunity to go nuclear, perhaps with this recent exchange in mind and his lack of support indicated in polls. It turns out that no other candidates graced the event so he turned it into questioning and answering, and someone asked him how he differed from Vitter. His answer: “I have not frequented prostitution, especially not while on the floor of the U.S. Congress.”

What Dardenne made allusion to was Vitter’s 2007 statement, as it appeared that information would be leaked to the public about an investigation into a prostitution ring and that a phone number connected to the freshman senator could be part of it, that he had committed a “serious sin,” and then never addressed the matter again. Note that Vitter never admitted that he had engaged in such behavior, nor was he charged ever criminally for doing so.

Nevertheless, from his statement and lack of protestation at the suggestion when made repeatedly subsequently, we can infer that Vitter did seek out such illegal services (and some investigative reporting corroborates this). However, Dardenne cannot claim that he knows Vitter “frequented” these on the floor of the House or Senate; there is no evidence to back that up. Yet by saying this, perhaps he hopes he can create the impression that this was the case.

Except that he’s five years too late. The issue acted as a central theme to former Rep. Charlie Melancon’s attempt to unseat Vitter in 2010. Much as Dardenne is trying to do now, Melancon tried to raise questions about Vitter’s ethics and character early and often in that campaign. That approach awarded him a blowout defeat by more than 20 points.

Vitter annihilated his challenger because his campaign stuck to the incumbent’s strength, the issues. Simply, Vitter has found himself very often on the right side of the state’s majority when it comes to these preferences, and his outsider, maverick personage as a legislator appeals to the escalating disenchantment the public has with politicians seen as too comfortable with keeping government size and power as is, currently reflected in that three leading candidates for the Republican presidential nomination haven’t spent a day in government, while another is seen as a slightly-westerly, Hispanic version of Vitter ideologically and as far as his relationship to the Senate leadership.

His last Senate election, in effect, inoculated him from the impact of his revelation, precisely because the majority of the electorate understood that whatever battle he raged within himself to overcome his personal weaknesses – and there’s zero evidence that Vitter has backslide on this – it did not interfere with his performance in office, a performance in terms of issues it applauded. Almost all who have indicated to date they would vote for him likely know about the incident, so Dardenne’s reminder won’t shake them. The only voters who see this of such overwhelming importance is the Angry Left, and they already have their candidate in the suit-wearing demagogue Edwards. This tactic wins Dardenne or anybody else few votes.

So it becomes a sign of Dardenne’s desperation that he would throw it out there. It won’t be the last time, and he won’t be the only one to do so, but the people have shown it won’t work. Therefore, that he did shows his situation is so precarious that he realizes he must try anything, no matter how farfetched its chances of success, to turn around his struggling campaign.

Jeffrey Sadow

Jeffrey Sadow is an associate professor of political science at Louisiana State University in Shreveport.   He writes a daily conservative blog called Between The Lines

Website: jeffsadow.blogspot.com/
Login to post comments
  • A July 4th Fact of Facts: America is Land of Immigrants
  • Poll: Trump strong on jobs, weak on tweets, viewed as reckless, thin-skinned, sexist
  • President Trump, It doesn't feel like Independence Day
  • YIPPIE! The naked truth about free speech, cherished especially on Independence Day

mass2On July 4, 1778, George Washington doubled liquor rations for the soldiers quartered in Princeton, NJ, as a way to celebrate Independence Day. It’s fitting, therefore, that the Fourth of July is America's top-selling beer holiday, according to the Beer Institute. It estimated, in 2013, that sales of beer on the 4th could total $1 billion, doubtlessly higher today. “In moderation,” claims a CA brewery investor, Grover McKean, “beer is tasty and healthy.” Who could disagree?

Read More

joe mikaAs Donald Trump faces the top world leaders this week, including a face-time with Vladimir Putin, and as his healthcare proposals face an uphill climb, his poll numbers for how the nation views him could be better.

According to a morning Consult/Politico poll released Wednesday morning, his tweets, including that against MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski, and his personality are not helping him, at all.

Read More

indy dayII know the calendar says we are approaching the 4th of July, but, it just doesn’t feel like Independence Day.

Perhaps it should.  It’s hot as heck.  The airlines have been packed. The hot dogs are ready for grilling.  The umps are saying, "play ball". The patriotic activities are scheduled. The fireworks are ready-for-blasting. 

Yet, it just doesn’t feel like independence day.

Read More

bill rights2To President Thomas Jefferson, July 4th celebrated more than the signing of the Declaration of Independence. He thought it was a link to the future. The message prominent colonists sent to King George III led to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, the initial and most prominent feature of which is the First Amendment that guarantees free speech. It’s part of the country’s fundamental essence that each man and woman can say what they feel about government, or anything else, proving President Donald Trump needs some civics lessons.

Read More

latter-blum2

Dead Pelican

Optimized-DeadPelican2 1 1