Possibly except for Schroder and Riser, none likely would have sought to leave before term’s end, and probably would have run for fourth terms, without term limits. However, given their natures – like tigers who when killing a human find they acquire a taste for us – these politicians have discovered they like wielding power and having taxpayers compensate them for it.
Therefore, we get more campaigns for more offices as a result. And we get these for longer periods as well, for others know who has embarked on a final term and so they begin running earlier and longer to succeed them, instead of waiting to see whether an incumbent wants to have another go at it.
Some observers don’t seem too jacked about “more job-shopping and extend[ed] campaign seasons,” and also decry the “lost institutional knowledge” that results. Yet, consider the alternative. Certainly, more competition for more jobs cannot injure the Republic and improves upon a situation where incumbents, using the tools of the office to reduce competition, almost always won reelection. And as Louisiana’s “institutional knowledge” in the past ended up ranking the state low on most indicators of economic development and quality of life, it doesn’t seem that repository had much value to it, meriting its dispersal.
Term limits act as a peaceful alternative to Thomas Jefferson’s evaluation of Shays Rebellion that “God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion …. The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” Regarding its legislature, Louisiana permits a rolling rebellion in 12-year generations minus the bloodshed.
And this also performs the valuable service of indicating who really wants to do their duty and who doesn’t. Adams, Lopinto, Montoucet, and Martiny all appear to have had less enthusiasm about doing their jobs because they were in the minority – even though all but Montoucet are Republicans in GOP-led chambers. That’s because all publicly supported Democrat John Bel Edwards over former Sen. David Vitter, a conservative Republican, and found their influence in the chambers waning as a consequence.
Of course, many who finish their final terms still have great passion to perform their current jobs and don’t want to look for a parachute, and would have liked to try to keep going, so term limits sweep them out as well. However, whoever will replace them seem highly likely to have great motivation as well. Thus, on balance, term limits produce legislators of greater commitment to their constituents and the state because this weeds out those thinking about other things and/or going through the motions because they enjoy the idea of being a legislator more than acting as one.
So, let’s play the game of musical chairs encouraged by term limits. It beats the alternative of more sclerotic governance.